全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

数字科技与城乡融合发展水平测度及区域差异分析
Digital Technology and Urban-Rural Integration: Measurement of Development Level and Analysis of Regional Differences

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.151023, PP. 184-193

Keywords: 数字科技,城乡融合,区域差异,时滞效应
Digital Technology
, Urban-Rural Integration, Regional Differences, Time Lag Effect

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

城乡融合是经济社会协同发展的核心议题,数字科技为破解城乡发展失衡问题提供了关键支撑,但二者深度融合的区域差异特征与内在作用逻辑仍有待明确。本文基于2012~2023年中国30个省级行政区面板数据,构建数字科技与城乡融合双指标体系,运用AHP-熵权组合赋权法、熵权-TOPSIS法、投影寻踪模型测度发展水平,结合变异系数与泰尔指数分析区域差异,最后进行稳健性检验。研究发现:二者均呈稳步上升态势,但增速存在显著异质性,数字科技赋能城乡融合存在时滞效应;差异来源呈现双重分化特征,数字科技以区域间差异为主导,城乡融合则以西部县域内差异为核心;数字科技发展受市场驱动的产业集聚效应影响显著,城乡融合提升得益于政策协调作用。据此,本文针对性提出缩短赋能时滞、破解数字鸿沟、聚焦县域均衡、强化协同保障的政策建议,为数字科技赋能城乡协同高质量发展提供实证参考与实践指引。
Urban-rural integration is a core issue in economic and social coordinated development. Digital technology effectively addresses urban-rural development imbalance, yet the regional differences and internal operational logic of their in-depth integration remain unclear. Using panel data of 30 Chinese provinces (2012~2023), this paper constructs a dual index system and measures development levels via the AHP-entropy weight method, entropy weight-TOPSIS method, and projection pursuit model. Regional differences are analyzed with the coefficient of variation and Theil index, followed by a robustness test. Results show that both maintain a steady upward trend with significant growth heterogeneity and a time-lag effect in digital empowerment; digital technology’s differences are dominated by inter-regional gaps, while urban-rural integration’s differences center on intra-county disparities in the west; digital technology development is driven by market-oriented industrial agglomeration, and urban-rural integration benefits from policy coordination. Targeted recommendations include shortening the time lag, bridging the digital divide, focusing on county-level balance, and strengthening coordinated guarantees, providing empirical reference for digital technology-enabled high-quality urban-rural development.

References

[1]  白永秀, 闫雪培. “十五五”时期“以人民为中心”推进城乡融合发展的总体框架、目标及路径[J]. 农村经济, 2025(6): 1-11.
[2]  余永华, 李小玉. 数字经济对城乡融合发展的影响及其空间效应[J]. 经济纵横, 2025(10): 79-87.
[3]  赵儒煜, 马文博, 李菁菁. 赋能于人: 数字技术促进城乡融合的机制和路径探析[J]. 经济纵横, 2025(11): 69-77.
[4]  步婉茹, 任君, 魏玮, 等. 黄河流域城乡融合发展综合评价: 水平测度、动态演进及其障碍因子[J]. 青海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 41(3): 1-11.
[5]  毛军, 梁沐晗, 谢嘉豪. 中国数字乡村发展统计测度与时空异质性研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(5): 80-89.
[6]  王诗敏, 田东林. 数字经济赋能城乡融合发展的水平测度及影响因素研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2025, 19(5): 108-116.
[7]  黄卓立. 数字基础设施建设促进中国城乡融合发展的机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2024.
[8]  徐杰, 杨梓, 赵春江. 数字技术与城乡融合发展: 理论机制与实证检验[J]. 经济问题, 2025(5): 61-68.
[9]  肖苏阳. 数字技术赋能产业创新: 路径与政策研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2023.
[10]  蒋为, 倪诗程, 彭淼. 数字科技企业赋能实体经济发展的效率变革——基于数字化供应链视角的理论与经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2025, 42(1): 51-71.
[11]  杨述明, 刘晓宇. 迈向空间治理的现代化: 数字技术驱动城乡融合发展[J]. 上海经济研究, 2025(10): 41-52.
[12]  徐雪. 双重逻辑视角下中国城乡融合水平测度及地区差异成因识别[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2025, 39(11): 79-93.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133