全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Agility in Mergers and Acquisitions: Redefining Business Model Transformation in the Digital Era

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2026.141030, PP. 517-536

Keywords: Mergers and Acquisitions, Organizational Agility, Organizational Learning, Dynamic Capabilities, Business Model Transformation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Post-merger integration has traditionally been approached as a problem of structural alignment and coordination. In digital-intensive environments, however, this perspective provides limited insight into how organizations sustain transformation beyond initial consolidation. This study examines how organizational agility supports learning and renewal in contexts of repeated mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Using a qualitative case study of a Greek IT firm that implemented multiple acquisitions between 2019 and 2024, the research explores how learning, adaptation, and innovation interact during post-merger transformation. Data were collected through document analysis, executive interviews, public sources, and long-term observation, and analyzed through an iterative interpretive process. The findings indicate that successful post-merger transformation depends less on formal integration and more on the organization’s ability to convert integration into an ongoing learning process. Agility emerges as a key enabling mechanism that links strategic orientation, organizational coordination, and technological recombination over time. Based on these insights, the study proposes the Agility-Transformation Framework, which conceptualizes post-merger transformation as a cyclical process connecting learning, adaptation, and innovation across successive integration phases. The study contributes to research on organizational change and dynamic capabilities by clarifying the role of agility in post-merger contexts. Practically, it offers a conceptual lens for organizations seeking to maintain coherence and adaptability during complex transformation processes.

References

[1]  Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
[2]  Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[3]  Barney, J., & Felin, T. (2013). What Are Microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138-155.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0107
[4]  Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[5]  Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding Strategic Agility: A Leadership Agenda for Accelerating Business Model Renewal. Long Range Planning, 43, 370-382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
[6]  Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
[7]  Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
[8]  Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::aid-smj133>3.0.co;2-e
[9]  Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., & Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351-1374.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.x
[10]  Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
[11]  Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Nursing Research, 17, Article 364.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
[12]  Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value through Corporate Renewal. Free Press.
[13]  Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 438-439.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
[14]  Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42, 239-273.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
[15]  Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[16]  Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
[17]  Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30, 167-186.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
[18]  Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
[19]  Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
[20]  Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2004). Deliberate Learning in Corporate Acquisitions: Post‐acquisition Strategies and Integration Capability in U.S. Bank Mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1233-1256.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.426

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133