The distinct oxidized and sulfidic facies of Sabodala gold mine tailings (Senegal), characterised by near-neutral drainage, are evaluated as potential secondary raw materials for non-load-bearing masonry in West Africa. This study evaluates NaOH-activated tailings as alkali-activated binders, examining mechanical performance, water absorption, leaching behavior, preliminary durability and curing energy demand. Both facies were activated with NaOH solutions of varying molarity and solution-to-solids ratio, with minor additions (~3 wt%) of Portland cement or hydrated lime and curing temperatures up to 210？C. NaOH molarity emerged as the primary strength driver, while solution fraction defined facies-specific optima at ~21 wt% (oxidized) and ~18 wt% (sulfidic). Within this window, under 210？C/4 h curing, 28-day compressive strengths reached 12 - 20 MPa with 24 h water absorption of 10% - 15%. Product leachates for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn remained low and within indicative construction product limits. Accelerated wet-dry and sulfate exposure tests showed strength retention generally above ~80%, though these represent short-term screening rather than full service-life assessment. The consistent flexural-compressive strength relationship (ft ~ 0.26 - 0.27 fc) enables compression-based quality control. Overall, this work establishes practical, facies-specific mixture windows for NaOH-activated Sabodala tailings as secondary mineral resources, guiding the development of lower-energy curing schedules and supporting future standardization of tailings-based masonry units and mine-tailings management strategies.
References
[1]
Kiventerä, J., Perumal, P., Yliniemi, J. and Illikainen, M. (2020) Mine Tailings as a Raw Material in Alkali Activation: A Review. InternationalJournalofMinerals, MetallurgyandMaterials, 27, 1009-1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2129-6
[2]
Mabroum, S., Moukannaa, S., El Machi, A., Taha, Y., Benzaazoua, M. and Hakkou, R. (2020) Mine Wastes Based Geopolymers: A Critical Review. CleanerEngineeringandTechnology, 1, Article ID: 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100014
[3]
Manaviparast, H.R., Miranda, T., Pereira, E. and Cristelo, N. (2024) A Comprehensive Review on Mine Tailings as a Raw Material in the Alkali Activation Process. AppliedSciences, 14, Article No. 5127. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125127
[4]
Guo, Y., Qu, F. and Li, W. (2025) Advancing Circular Economy and Construction Sustainability: Transforming Mine Tailings into High-Value Cementitious and Alkali-Activated Concrete. NPJMaterialsSustainability, 3, Article No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44296-025-00049-9
[5]
Palomo, A., Grutzeck, M.W. and Blanco, M.T. (1999) Alkali-Activated Fly Ashes: A Cement for the Future. CementandConcreteResearch, 29, 1323-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00243-9
[6]
Davidovits, J. (2008) Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. Geopolymer Institute.
[7]
Provis, J.L. and van Deventer, J.S.J., Eds. (2014) Alkali Activated Materials: State-of-the-Art Report, RILEM TC 224-AAM. Springer.
[8]
Luukkonen, T., Abdollahnejad, Z., Yliniemi, J., Kinnunen, P. and Illikainen, M. (2018) One-Part Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review. CementandConcreteResearch, 103, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.001
Fernández-Jiménez, A. and Palomo, A. (2003) Characterisation of Fly Ashes. Potential Reactivity as Alkaline Cements. Fuel, 82, 2259-2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(03)00194-7
[11]
Puertas, F. and Fernández-Jiménez, A. (2003) Mineralogical and Microstructural Characterisation of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash/Slag Pastes. CementandConcreteComposites, 25, 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00059-8
[12]
Fang, G., Ho, W.K., Tu, W. and Zhang, M. (2018) Workability and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash-Slag Concrete Cured at Ambient Temperature. ConstructionandBuildingMaterials, 172, 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.008
[13]
Amer, I., Kohail, M., El-Feky, M.S., Rashad, A. and Khalaf, M.A. (2021) A Review on Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete. AinShamsEngineeringJournal, 12, 1475-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.12.003
[14]
Krishna, R.S., Shaikh, F., Mishra, J., Lazorenko, G. and Kasprzhitskii, A. (2021) Mine Tailings-Based Geopolymers: Properties, Applications and Industrial Prospects. CeramicsInternational, 47, 17826-17843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.180
[15]
Van Jaarsveld, J.G.S., Van Deventer, J.S.J. and Lorenzen, L. (1997) The Potential Use of Geopolymeric Materials to Immobilise Toxic Metals: Part I. Theory and Applications. MineralsEngineering, 10, 659-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-6875(97)00046-0
Caballero, E., Sánchez, W. and Ríos, C.A. (2014) Synthesis of Geopolymers from Alkaline Activation of Gold Mining Wastes. Ingeniería y Competitividad, 16, 317-330. https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v16i1.3735
[18]
Kiventerä, J., Lancellotti, I., Catauro, M., Poggetto, F.D., Leonelli, C. and Illikainen, M. (2018) Alkali Activation as New Option for Gold Mine Tailings Inertization. JournalofCleanerProduction, 187, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.182
[19]
Yao, G., Liu, Q., Wang, J., Wu, P. and Lyu, X. (2019) Effect of Mechanical Grinding on Pozzolanic Activity and Hydration Properties of Siliceous Gold Ore Tailings. JournalofCleanerProduction, 217, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.175
[20]
Morales Aranibar, C.G., La Rosa Toro Gómez, A., da Silva, J.L., Morales-Aranibar, L. and Arán, D. (2025) Reuse of Mine Tailings through Geopolymerization Applied to 3D Printing: A Review of Progress, Challenges and Perspectives. Sustainability, 17, Article No. 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062617
[21]
Ahmari, S. and Zhang, L. (2013) Durability and Leaching Behavior of Mine Tailings-Based Geopolymer Bricks. ConstructionandBuildingMaterials, 44, 743-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.075
[22]
Thejas, H.K. and Hossiney, N. (2022) Alkali-Activated Bricks Made with Mining Waste Iron Ore Tailings. CaseStudiesinConstructionMaterials, 16, e00973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00973
[23]
CEN (2015) EN 771-1:2011+A1:2015 Specification for Masonry Units-Part 1: Clay Masonry Units. European Committee for Standardization.
[24]
CEN (2015) EN 771-3:2011+A1:2015 Specification for Masonry Units-Part 3: Aggregate Concrete Masonry Units (Dense and Lightweight Aggregates). European Committee for Standardization.
[25]
ASTM International (2021) ASTM C67/C67M-21 Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile. ASTM International.
[26]
ASTM International (2023) ASTM C62-23 Standard Specification for Building Brick (Solid Masonry Units Made from Clay or Shale). ASTM International.
[27]
Nordstrom, D.K. and Alpers, C.N. (1997) Geochemistry of Acid Mine Waters. In: Plumlee, G.S. and Logsdon, M.J., Eds., The Environmental Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits, Part A: Processes, Methods, and Health Issues, Society of Economic Geologists, 133-160. https://doi.org/10.5382/rev.06.06
[28]
Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., Jambor, J.L. and Weisener, C.G. (2003) The Geochemistry of Acid Mine Drainage. In: Jambor, J.L., Blowes, D.W. and Ritchie, A.I.M., Eds., Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes, Mineralogical Association of Canada, 149-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/09137-4
[29]
Lindsay, M.B.J., Moncur, M.C., Bain, J.G., Jambor, J.L., Ptacek, C.J. and Blowes, D.W. (2015) Geochemical and Mineralogical Aspects of Sulfide Mine Tailings. AppliedGeochemistry, 57, 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.01.009
[30]
Park, I., Tabelin, C.B., Jeon, S., Li, X., Seno, K., Ito, M., et al. (2019) A Review of Recent Strategies for Acid Mine Drainage Prevention and Mine Tailings Recycling. Chemosphere, 219, 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.053
[31]
CEN (2011) EN 197-1:2011 Cement-Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. European Committee for Standardization.
[32]
ASTM International (2018) ASTM C1012/C1012M-18b Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulfate Solution. ASTM International.
[33]
CEN (2002) EN 12457-2:2002 Characterisation of Waste-Leaching-Compliance Test for Leaching of Granular Waste Materials and Sludges-Part 2: One Stage Batch Test at a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 L/kg for Materials with Particle Size below 4 mm (without or with Size Reduction). European Committee for Standardization.
[34]
Washburn, E.W. (1921) The Dynamics of Capillary Flow. PhysicalReview, 17, 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.17.273
[35]
Tibbetts, C.M., Tao, C., Paris, J.M. and Ferraro, C.C. (2020) Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Parameters for Use in Concrete Penetrability Qualification Using the Katz-Thompson Relationship. ConstructionandBuildingMaterials, 263, Article ID: 119834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119834
[36]
ASTM International (2025) ASTM C55-25: Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Concrete Building Brick. ASTM International.
[37]
Lv, Y., Wang, C., Han, W., Li, X. and Peng, H. (2023) Study of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash-Slag Composite Cementitious Materials. Polymers, 15, Article No. 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081903
[38]
Dhevaraju, L., Reddy, E.A., Dogiparthy, N.D. and Kar, A. (2019) Relationship between Flexural and Compressive Strength of Concrete Made of Alkali Activated Binder. In: Dasgupta, K., Ed., National Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Springer International Publishing, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26365-2_13
[39]
Li, B., Wu, F., Xia, D., Li, Y., Cui, K., Wu, F., et al. (2023) Compressive and Flexural Behavior of Alkali-Activated Slag-Based Concrete: Effect of Recycled Aggregate Content. JournalofBuildingEngineering, 67, Article ID: 105993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105993
[40]
Tajunnisa, Y., Rasuli, M.I., Yamamura, A. and Shigeishi, M. (2023) Reliability Prediction of Alkali-Activated Mortar during Flexural Loading Using Weibull Analysis. Heliyon, 9, e21512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21512
[41]
IEA-ETSAP and IRENA (2015) Solar Heat for Industrial Processes: Technology Brief E21. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).
[42]
Pol Segura, I., Ranjbar, N., Juul Damø, A., Skaarup Jensen, L., Canut, M. and Arendt Jensen, P. (2023) A Review: Alkali-Activated Cement and Concrete Production Technologies Available in the Industry. Heliyon, 9, e15718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15718
[43]
Ricciotti, L., Lucariello, D., Perrotta, V., Apicella, A. and Aversa, R. (2025) Sustainable Alkali-Activated and Geopolymer Materials: What Is the Future for Italy? Recycling, 10, Article No. 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10040140
