Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used for occupational safety and health (OSH) training, yet the VR laboratory itself is seldom treated as an exposure environment requiring systematic industrial hygiene management. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that applies the Anticipate, Recognize, Evaluate, Control, and Confirm (ARECC) model to VR training labs, treating them as multi？hazard workplaces with physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, electrical, and psychosocial exposures. The framework integrates a tiered exposure？assessment strategy ranging from qualitative screening to semi？quantitative scales and quantitative, sensor？based monitoring with engineering, administrative, and data？governance controls tailored to immersive environments. Real？time environmental, biomechanical, and physiological data streams from sensors, wearables, and eye tracking systems are used to construct multi？domain exposure profiles and to verify the effectiveness of control measures. The application of the framework is demonstrated through a VR confined？space entry training scenario in an industrial setting, showing how it can inform design decisions, operational policies, and continuous improvement across VR lab implementations. The paper concludes with implications for research and practice, highlighting needs for standardized VR？specific exposure metrics, empirical validation of the framework across sectors, and development of guidance that aligns VR training facilities with contemporary exposure？risk management principles.
References
[1]
Scorgie, D., Feng, Z., Paes, D., Parisi, F., Yiu, T.W. and Lovreglio, R. (2024) Virtual Reality for Safety Training: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. SafetyScience, 171, Article ID: 106372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106372
[2]
Evangelista, A., Manghisi, V.M., De Giglio, V., Mariconte, R., Giliberti, C. and Uva, A.E. (2025) From Knowledge to Action: Assessing the Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality Training on Safety Behaviors in Confined Spaces Using the Kirkpatrick Model. SafetyScience, 181, Article ID: 106693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106693
[3]
Bernabei, M., Colabianchi, S., Carli, M., Costantino, F., Ferrarotti, A., Neri, M., et al. (2024) Enhancing Occupational Safety and Health Training: A Guideline for Virtual Reality Integration. IEEEAccess, 12, 154349-154364. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3481668
[4]
Simón-Vicente, L., Rodríguez-Cano, S., Delgado-Benito, V., Ausín-Villaverde, V. and Cubo Delgado, E. (2024) Cybersickness. a Systematic Literature Review of Adverse Effects Related to Virtual Reality. Neurología (EnglishEdition), 39, 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.04.007
[5]
Jelonek, M. (2023) VRtoER: When Virtual Reality leads to Accidents: A Community on Reddit as Lens to Insights about VR Safety. Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, 23-28 April 2023, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585783
[6]
Babangida, A.A., Caraballo-Arias, Y., Decataldo, F. and Violante, F.S. (2025) Advancing Occupational Medicine through Wearable Technology: A Review of Sensor Systems for Biomechanical Risk Assessment and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevention. ACSSensors, 10, 5410-5432. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.5c01578
[7]
Alenjareghi, M.J., Sekkay, F., Dadouchi, C. and Keivanpour, S. (2026) Wearable Sensors in Industry 4.0: Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders. SensorsInternational, 7, Article ID: 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2025.100343
[8]
Jahn, S.D., Bullock, W.H. and Ignacio, J.S. (2024) A Strategy for Assessing and Managing Occupational Exposures. 4th Edition, American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA).
[9]
Tang, Y., Liang, H. and Zhan, J. (2024) The Application of Metaverse in Occupational Health. FrontiersinPublicHealth, 12, Article 1396878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396878
[10]
(2020) Understanding and Applying ARECC to Occupational and Environmental Health and Safety. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), 1-16.
[11]
Tamers, S.L., Chosewood, L.C., Childress, A., Hudson, H., Nigam, J. and Chang, C. (2019) Total Worker Health® 2014-2018: The Novel Approach to Worker Safety, Health, and Well-Being Evolves. InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalResearchandPublicHealth, 16, Article 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030321
[12]
Roberts, S.C., Havill, N.L., Flores, R.M., Hendrix II, C.A., Williams, M.J., Feinn, R.S., et al. (2022) Disinfection of Virtual Reality Devices in Health Care Settings: In Vitro Assessment and Survey Study. JournalofMedicalInternetResearch, 24, e42332. https://doi.org/10.2196/42332
[13]
Souchet, A.D., Lourdeaux, D., Pagani, A. and Rebenitsch, L. (2022) A Narrative Review of Immersive Virtual Reality’s Ergonomics and Risks at the Workplace: Cybersickness, Visual Fatigue, Muscular Fatigue, Acute Stress, and Mental Overload. VirtualReality, 27, 19-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00672-0
[14]
Souchet, A.D., Lourdeaux, D., Burkhardt, J. and Hancock, P.A. (2023) Design Guidelines for Limiting and Eliminating Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects at Work: A Comprehensive, Factor-Oriented Review. FrontiersinPsychology, 14, Article 1161932. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161932
[15]
Chen, Y. and Wu, Z. (2023) A Review on Ergonomics Evaluations of Virtual Reality. Work, 74, 831-841. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-205232
[16]
Sevinc, V. and Berkman, M.I. (2020) Psychometric Evaluation of Simulator Sickness Questionnaire and Its Variants as a Measure of Cybersickness in Consumer Virtual Environments. AppliedErgonomics, 82, Article ID: 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102958
[17]
Xi, N., Chen, J., Gama, F., Riar, M. and Hamari, J. (2022) The Challenges of Entering the Metaverse: An Experiment on the Effect of Extended Reality on Workload. InformationSystemsFrontiers, 25, 659-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10244-x
[18]
Naranjo, J.E., Mora, C.A., Bustamante Villagómez, D.F., Mancheno Falconi, M.G. and Garcia, M.V. (2025) Wearable Sensors in Industrial Ergonomics: Enhancing Safety and Productivity in Industry 4.0. Sensors, 25, Article 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051526
[19]
Kriklenko, E., Kovaleva, A., Klimenko, A., Dukuev, U. and Pertsov, S. (2022) Multimodal Assessment of Changes in Physiological Indicators When Presenting a Video Fragment on Screen (2D) versus a VR (3D) Environment. BehaviouralNeurology, 2022, Article ID: 5346128. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5346128
[20]
Biswas, N., Mukherjee, A. and Bhattacharya, S. (2024) “Are You Feeling Sick?”—A Systematic Literature Review of Cybersickness in Virtual Reality. ACMComputingSurveys, 56, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3670008
[21]
Magee, P., Ienca, M. and Farahany, N. (2024) Beyond Neural Data: Cognitive Biometrics and Mental Privacy. Neuron, 112, 3017-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.004
[22]
Spivack, J., Givens, A., O’Hara, J., Heller, B. and Valladares, C. (2024) Data Privacy Experts Dive into the Data Uses and Risks for XR on Latest Webinar. XRA Association.
