Nearly one million otoliths, the calcified structures of the inner ear in teleost fish, are sampled annually in the world for the stock assessment. The analysis of internal otolith measurements is based on the idea that there is a relationship between fish size and otolith size and that this proxy is representative of the whole shape of the otolith. In this study, the relationship between fish total length (TL) and five morphometric parameters extracted to the 3D shape otolith analysis, are examined: length (OL), width (OW), height (OH), area (OA) and volume (OV), based on a set of 104 otoliths belonging to 22 species from the English Channel and the North Sea. The otoliths were scanned in three dimensions using an X-ray microtomography, and the relationships were modelled using an allometric log-linear model. The results reveal significant relationships for all metrics (p < 0.001), with coefficients of determination (R2) ranging from 0.500 to 0.656. In the multi-species pooled model, otolith width (R2 = 0.656) proved to be the most robust predictor of fish size, slightly outperforming 3D metrics such as area (R2 = 0.617) and volume (R2 = 0.580). Otolith length (R2 = 0.556) was less accurate than three-dimensional metrics. But given the limited sample sizes per species, these allometric trends should be viewed as preliminary, necessitating larger datasets for species-specific validation. The usual morphometric parameters, such as otolith length, are significant proxies of the whole shape of the otolith. These results suggested the common idea that otolith length is a useful indicator, but otolith width must be considered for greater accuracy and 3D metrics for more detailed shape information. However, the combination of species with varying ecologies and growth rates influences data dispersion and highlights the need for species-specific calibrations. These findings confirm the relevance of otolith metrics for estimating fish size and strengthen their utility in trophic ecology, paleoecology, and fisheries management studies.
References
[1]
Campana, S. (1999) Chemistry and Composition of Fish Otoliths: Pathways, Mechanisms and Applications. MarineEcologyProgressSeries, 188, 263-297. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps188263
[2]
Panfili, J., de Pontual, H., Troadec, H. and Wright, P.J. (2002) Manual of Fish Sclerochronology. Ifremer-IRD Coedition.
[3]
Campana, S.E. and Thorrold, S.R. (2001) Otoliths, Increments, and Elements: Keys to a Comprehensive Understanding of Fish Populations? CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences, 58, 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-177
[4]
Elsdon, T.S., Wells, B.K., Campana, S.E., Gillanders, B.M., Jones, C.M., Limburg, K.E., et al. (2008) Otolith Chemistry to Describe Movements and Life-History Parameters of Fishes: Hypotheses, Assumptions, Limitations and Inferences. In: OceanographyandMarineBiology—AnAnnualReview, CRC Press, 297-330. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420065756.ch7
[5]
Harvey, J.T., Loughlin, T.R., Perez, M.A. and Oxman, D.S. (2000) Relationship be-tween Fish Size and Otolith Length for 63 Species of Fishes from the Eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 150, 1-36.
[6]
Battaglia, P., Malara, D., Ammendolia, G., Romeo, T. and Andaloro, F. (2015) Relationships between Otolith Size and Fish Length in Some Mesopelagic Teleosts (Myctophidae, Paralepididae, Phosichthyidae and Stomiidae). JournalofFishBiology, 87, 774-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12744
[7]
Lombarte, A. and Lleonart, J. (1993) Otolith Size Changes Related with Body Growth, Habitat Depth and Temperature. EnvironmentalBiologyofFishes, 37, 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00004637
[8]
Jobling, M. and Breiby, A. (1986) The Use and Abuse of Fish Otoliths in Studies of Feeding Habits of Marine Piscivores. Sarsia, 71, 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00364827.1986.10419696
[9]
Härkönen, T. (1986) Guide to the Otoliths of the Bony Fishes of the Northeast Atlantic. Danbiu ApS Biological Consultants.
[10]
Tuset, V.M., Lombarte, A. and Assis, C.A. (2008) Otolith Atlas for the Western Mediterranean, North and Central Eastern Atlantic. ScientiaMarina, 72, 7-198. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2008.72s17
[11]
Campana, S.E. (2004) Photographic Atlas of Fish Otoliths of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, No. 133, 1-284.
[12]
Giraldo, C., Le Roy, D. and Martin-Baillet, V. (2021) CGFS2021 Cruise, Thalassa R/V. Sismer.
[13]
Giraldo, C., Le Roy, D. and Martin-Baillet, V. (2022) CGFS2022 Cruise, Thalassa R/V. Sismer.
[14]
Lazard, C.L. and Auber, A. (2022) IBTS 2022 Cruise, Thalassa R/V. Sismer.
[15]
Andrialovanirina, N., Poloni, L., Laffont, R., Poisson Caillault, É., Couette, S. and Mahé, K. (2024) 3D Meshes Dataset of Sagittal Otoliths from Red Mullet in the Mediterranean Sea. ScientificData, 11, Article No. 813. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03641-1
[16]
Andrialovanirina N., Poisson Caillault E., Mateos A., Laffont R., Mackenzie K., Couette S. and Mahe K. (2025) 3D Meshes Dataset of Sagittal Otoliths from 22 Fish Species in the English Channel and North Sea. SEANOE,
[17]
Campana, S.E. and Casselman, J.M. (1993) Stock Discrimination Using Otolith Shape Analysis. CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences, 50, 1062-1083. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-123
[18]
Bani, A., Poursaeid, S. and Tuset, V.M. (2013) Comparative Morphology of the Sagittal Otolith in Three Species of South Caspian Gobies. JournalofFishBiology, 82, 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12073
[19]
Škeljo, F. and Ferri, J. (2012) The Use of Otolith Shape and Morphometry for Identification and Size-Estimation of Five Wrasse Species in Predator-Prey Studies. JournalofAppliedIchthyology, 28, 524-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01925.x
[20]
R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
[21]
Granadeiro, J. and Silva, M. (2000) The Use of Otoliths and Vertebrae in the Identification and Size-Estimation of Fish in Predator-Prey Studies. Cybium: International Journal of Ichthyology, 24, 383-393.
[22]
Campana, S.E. (1990) How Reliable Are Growth Back-Calculations Based on Otoliths? CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences, 47, 2219-2227. https://doi.org/10.1139/f90-246
[23]
Vigliola, L., Harmelin-Vivien, M. and Meekan, M.G. (2000) Comparison of Techniques of Back-Calculation of Growth and Settlement Marks from the Otoliths of Three Species of Diplodus from the Mediterranean Sea. CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences, 57, 1291-1299. https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-055
[24]
Bostanci, D., Polat, N., Kurucu, G., Yedier, S., Kontaş, S. and Darçin, M. (2015) Using Otolith Shape and Morphometry to Identify Four Alburnus Species (A. chalcoides, A. Escherichii, A. Mossulensis and A. tarichi) in Turkish Inland Waters. JournalofAppliedIchthyology, 31, 1013-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12860
[25]
Dehghani, M., Kamrani, E., Salarpouri, A. and Sharifian, S. (2016) Otolith Dimensions (Length, Width), Otolith Weight and Fish Length of Sardinella sindensis (Day, 1878), as Index for Environmental Studies, Persian Gulf, Iran. MarineBiodiversityRecords, 9, Article No. 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-016-0039-0
[26]
Bose, A.P.H., Adragna, J.B. and Balshine, S. (2016) Otolith Morphology Varies between Populations, Sexes and Male Alternative Reproductive Tactics in a Vocal Toadfish Porichthysnotatus. JournalofFishBiology, 90, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13187
[27]
Hunt, J.J. (1992) Morphological Characteristics of Otoliths of Selected Fish in the Northwest Atlantic. JournalofNorthwestAtlanticFisheryScience, 13, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.2960/j.v13.a5
[28]
Hüssy, K. (2008) Otolith Shape in Juvenile Cod (Gadus morhua): Ontogenetic and Environmental Effects. JournalofExperimentalMarineBiologyandEcology, 364, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.06.026
[29]
Callicó Fortunato, R., Benedito Durà, V., González-Castro, M. and Volpedo, A. (2017) Morphological and Morphometric Changes of Sagittae Otoliths Related to Fish Growth in Three Mugilidae Species. JournalofAppliedIchthyology, 33, 1137-1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13479
[30]
Ponton, D. (2006) Is Geometric Morphometrics Efficient for Comparing Otolith Shape of Different Fish Species? JournalofMorphology, 267, 750-757. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10439
[31]
Tuset, V.M., Farré, M., Otero-Ferrer, J.L., Vilar, A., Morales-Nin, B. and Lombarte, A. (2016) Testing Otolith Morphology for Measuring Marine Fish Biodiversity. MarineandFreshwaterResearch, 67, 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf15052
[32]
Volpedo, A.V. and Echeverría, D.D. (2003) Ecomorphological Patterns of the Sagitta in Fish on the Continental Shelf off Argentine. FisheriesResearch, 60, 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-7836(02)00170-4
[33]
Stransky, C., Baumann, H., Fevolden, S., Harbitz, A., Høie, H., Nedreaas, K.H., et al. (2008) Separation of Norwegian Coastal Cod and Northeast Arctic Cod by Outer Otolith Shape Analysis. FisheriesResearch, 90, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.09.009
[34]
Mosegaard, H., Svedäng, H. and Taberman, K. (1988) Uncoupling of Somatic and Otolith Growth Rates in Arctic Char (Salvelinusalpinus) as an Effect of Differences in Temperature Response. CanadianJournalofFisheriesandAquaticSciences, 45, 1514-1524. https://doi.org/10.1139/f88-180
[35]
Gauldie, R.W. (1988) Function, Form and Time-Keeping Properties of Fish Otoliths. ComparativeBiochemistryandPhysiologyPartA: Physiology, 91, 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(88)90436-7
