全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

译入译出视角下文化因素翻译的再语境化
Recontextualization of Cultural Factors in Direct and Inverse Translations

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.141034, PP. 259-266

Keywords: 再语境化,译入,译出,文化因素,《茶馆》
Recontextualization
, Inverse Translation, Direct Translation, Cultural Factors, Teahouse

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

再语境化研究近年来越来越强调语言使用者的地位,但对译者主体性的探讨仍显不足。《茶馆》作为老舍的经典话剧作品,有着丰富的文化内涵,其翻译中的文化因素为再语境化研究提供了独特视角。本研究从译入译出双视角出发,以《茶馆》的两个英译本为例,分析了其中文化因素翻译的再语境化。研究发现,中国译者英若诚注重戏剧表演性,采用归化策略,使译文贴近英语观众认知习惯;母语译者霍华则以文学读者为预期受众,采用异化策略,保留源文化独特性。通过对比分析,揭示了不同翻译路径下译者如何在各自语境中重构原作文化内涵,以及再语境化在文化传播中的独特挑战和意义。
Recent studies on recontextualization increasingly emphasized the role of language users, yet attention to translators’ subjectivity remained inadequate. Teahouse, a classic play by Lao She renowned for its rich cultural connotations, offers a unique perspective for examining the recontextualization of cultural elements in translation. The study adopted both direct and inverse translation perspectives to analyze the recontextualization of cultural factors in two English versions of Teahouse. The results indicate that the Chinese translator Ying Ruocheng, focuses on theatrical performativity and employs a domestication strategy to align the translation with the cognitive expectations of English-speaking audiences. In contrast, English translator John Howard-Gibbon targets literary readers and adopts a foreignization strategy that preserves the distinctiveness of the source culture. Through comparative analysis, the study shows how translators reconstruct the cultural meaning of the original work within different sociocultural contexts and explore the unique challenges and significance of recontextualization in cross-cultural communication.

References

[1]  老舍. 茶馆[M]. 海口: 南海出版社, 2010.
[2]  老舍. 茶馆[M]. 英若诚, 译. 北京: 中国对外翻译出版公司, 1999.
[3]  老舍. 茶馆[M]. 霍华, 译. 北京: 外文出版社, 2001.
[4]  曾斌, 陈志华. 再语境化: 理论创新的一种可能[J]. 内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 2010, 31(2): 139-142.
[5]  Bernstein, B. (1996) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Taylor and Francis.
[6]  Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
[7]  van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999) Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis. Discourse Studies, 1, 83-118.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005

[8]  辛斌. 批评话语研究中的互文性分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2021(3): 1-12.
[9]  Linell, P. (1998) Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualization and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse. Text & Talk, 18, 143-158.
https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143

[10]  Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
[11]  田海龙. 社会实践网络与再情景化的纵横维度——批评话语分析的新课题及解决方案[J]. 外语教学, 2017, 38(6): 7-11.
[12]  王国凤. 诗歌翻译的再语境化——从龙应台的译作《紫杜鹃》谈起[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2015(2): 80-85.
[13]  尤泽顺, 李俊义. 批评语境观视角下译者原文识解/译文产出的自我调适[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2021(3): 44-52+148.
[14]  陈小慰. 文学翻译中文学性的再语境化: 译入实践对译出的启发[J]. 中华译学, 2024(2): 37-50.
[15]  李梦. 用典翻译的“再语境化”可行性研究——以《习近平用典》为例[J]. 安阳师范学院学报, 2021(3): 119-122.
[16]  韩松, 吴通通. 再语境化下外交例行记者会中国特色文化词句英译研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(6): 610-614+636.
[17]  刘瑞娜, 许文胜. 诗词化外交辞令: 多义性与再语境化的生成和翻译[J]. 外语研究, 2025, 42(1): 94-99+112.
[18]  谢天振. 中国文学走出去: 问题与实质[J]. 中国比较文学, 2014(1): 1-10.
[19]  苗琳娜.《推销员之死》英若诚译本探析——以“功能加忠诚”原则为视角[J]. 湖北函授大学学报, 2014, 27(13): 124-125.
[20]  泰勒. 原始文化[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1988: 55-73.
[21]  Nida, E. (1945) Linguistics and Ethnology in Translation-Problems. WORD, 1, 194-208.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1945.11659254

[22]  胡敏中. 论物质文化和非物质文化[J]. 新视野, 2008(1): 73-75.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133