全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Business Retention Strategies through Argosy Theory: A Qualitative Case Study of Voluntary Turnover in Call Centers

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2026.141020, PP. 333-356

Keywords: Argosy Theory, Social Exchange Theory, Employee Retention, Turnover Intentions, Organizational Alignment, Work-Life Integration, Leadership Development, Employee Engagement, Call Centers, Technology Mediators

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Employee retention is a challenging issue for HR practitioners at present. This study, grounded in Argosy Theory—a novel integrative framework that synthesizes principles from social exchange theory, person-organization fit, and HR technology research—analyzes voluntary turnover and turnover intentions in call centers using a qualitative single-case study design that combines semi-structured interviews with call center leaders and an analysis of internal turnover data. The results indicate that intentions to leave were contingent on perceived reciprocity, person-organization fit, leadership quality, and work-life balance. Employee perceptions of a fair and balanced exchange were associated with reduced intent to leave (Blau, 1964). The study examines AI-based scheduling and supervision as dual factors: they support retention when used transparently but cause stress when seen as surveillance. The findings extend social exchange theory in call center turnover research and offer practical guidance for managers, including fostering genuine employee-organization relationships, clarifying role expectations, and investing in supervisory leadership development (Bass & Riggio, 2006; Holtom et al., 2008). The financial and customer service impacts of voluntary turnover are discussed, highlighting the strategic importance of focused retention programs in call center environments.

References

[1]  Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee Engagement, Human Resource Management Practices and Competitive Advantage: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2, 7-35.
https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-08-2014-0042
[2]  Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[3]  Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[4]  Batt, R., & Colvin, A. J. S. (2011). An Employment Systems Approach to Turnover: Human Resources Practices, Quits, Dismissals, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 695-717.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64869448
[5]  Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley.
[6]  Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016). Conceptualising the Future of HRM and Technology Research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 2652-2671.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296
[7]  Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Daily Job Demands and Employee Work Engagement: The Role of Daily Transformational Leadership Behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23, 338-349.
https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000082
[8]  Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 479-516.
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
[9]  Holman, D. (2002). Employee Wellbeing in Call Centres. Human Resource Management Journal, 12, 35-50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2002.tb00076.x
[10]  Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Eberly, M. B. (2008). Turnover and Retention Research: A Glance at the Past, a Closer Review of the Present, and a Venture into the Future. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 231-274.
https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211552
[11]  Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of Individuals’ Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
[12]  Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., Koopman, J., & Passantino, L. G. (2017). Is Consistently Unfair Better than Sporadically Fair? An Investigation of Justice Variability and Stress. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 743-770.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0455
[13]  Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement Revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6, 19-38.
https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-06-2018-0034
[14]  Shah, S. S., Tariq, B., & Bhatti, M. A. (2023). Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic and Turnover Intention: The Moderating Effect of Employee Work Engagement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7, Article 100455.
[15]  Strohmeier, S., & Parry, E. (2014). HRM in the Digital Age—Digital Changes and Challenges of the HR Profession. Employee Relations, 36, 345-361.
[16]  Yang, J., Arshad, M. A., Zhao, M., & Cao, S. (2024). The Relationship between High-Performance Work Practices and Employee Turnover Intention: An Analysis Based on a Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 13, 620-644.
[17]  Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
[18]  Zito, M., Emanuel, F., Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., Ghislieri, C., & Colombo, L. (2018). Turnover Intentions in a Call Center: The Role of Emotional Dissonance, Job Resources, and Job Satisfaction. PLOS ONE, 13, e0192126.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192126

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133