全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

课程思政内涵解构模型设计
Design of a Connotation Deconstruction Model for Curriculum Ideology and Politics Education

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.161026, PP. 182-191

Keywords: 课程思政,高等教育,教学改革
Curriculum Ideology and Politics Education
, Higher Education, Teaching Reform

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

课程思政是国家教学改革的核心目标,也是落实立德树人根本任务的关键所在。在全面推进课程思政建设的战略背景下,高校课程思政建设普遍面临优秀课程思政建设方案迁移性差、跨学科适配性不足的挑战。本研究基于《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》及相关教育学理论,构建了课程思政内涵解构模型。该模型包含政治素养、博爱情怀、科学素养、法制精神、社会责任等五个维度及22项具体指标。通过对各内涵要素的系统阐释和多学科应用示例,初步构建出模块化、可复用的课程思政建设模型。该模型具有易复制、易组合、易评价的特点,为不同专业课程开展思政建设提供了理论依据和实践路径,对推动课程思政和专业教育的深度融合具有借鉴价值。
Curriculum ideology and politics education is a core objective of national teaching reform and the key to fulfilling the fundamental mission of fostering virtue and nurturing talent. Against the strategic backdrop of comprehensively advancing the construction of curriculum ideology and politics education, universities collectively face the challenge that exemplary models demonstrate poor transferability and insufficient cross-disciplinary adaptability. Based on the Guidelines for the “Construction of Curriculum Ideology and Politics Education in Higher Education” and relevant educational theories, this study constructs a connotation deconstruction model for curriculum ideology and politics education. The model comprises five dimensions—political literacy, humanistic care, scientific literacy, rule-of-law awareness, and social responsibility—and 22 specific indicators. Through systematic interpretation of these elements and multi-disciplinary application examples, the study preliminarily establishes a modular and reusable model for curriculum ideology and politics education. Characterized by replicability, combinability, and evaluability, the model provides theoretical foundations and practical pathways for implementing curriculum ideology and politics education across different professional courses, offering valuable insights for promoting deeper integration between this educational approach and professional education.

References

[1]  在全国高校思想政治工作会议上的讲话[N]. 人民日报, 2016-12-09(001).
[2]  中共教育部党组. 高校思想政治工作质量提升工程实施纲要[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2017(12): 34-38.
[3]  教育部. 关于加快建设高水平本科教育全面提高人才培养能力的意见[EB/OL]. 2018-10-08.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201810/t20181017_351887.html, 2024-11-18.
[4]  教育部, 中共中央组织部, 中共中央宣传部, 财政部, 人力资源社会保障部, 共青团中央. 关于加快构建高校思想政治工作体系的意见[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2020(5): 3-8.
[5]  教育部. 高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2020(6): 8-12.
[6]  高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2022.
[7]  高德毅, 宗爱东. 从思政课程到课程思政: 战略思考与路径探索[J]. 中国高等教育, 2017(1): 43-46.
[8]  陆道坤. 课程思政推行中若干核心问题及解决思路[J]. 思想理论教育, 2018(3): 66-69.
[9]  沈壮海. 推动思政课程与课程思政同向同行[J]. 中国高等教育, 2017(19): 22-24.
[10]  王学俭, 石岩. 新时代课程思政的内涵、特点、难点及应对策略[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 41(2): 50-58.
[11]  刘辉, 姬文静, 孔杰, 王强, 金侃, 徐畅, 姚晓悦. 从课程思政到专业思政: 高校工科专业课程思政研究的主题知识图谱演变规律[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(10): 169-179.
https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.14101847
[12]  Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S. and Masia, B.B. (1964) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. David McKay Company.
[13]  Jackson, P.W. (1968) Life in Classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[14]  Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
[15]  Kohlberg, L. (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. Harper & Row.
[16]  Raths, L.E., Harmin, M. and Simon, S.B. (1966) Values and Teaching: Working with Values in the Classroom. Charles E. Merrill.
[17]  Fosnot, C.T. (2005) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. 2nd Edition, Teachers College Press.
[18]  Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Jost, J.T. and Sidanius, J., Eds., Political Psychology: Key Readings, Psychology Press, 276-293.
[19]  Super, D.E. (1980) A Life-Span, Life-Space Approach to Career Development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282-298.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1
[20]  Mansilla, V.B. and Jackson, A. (2011) Educating for Global Competence: Preparing Our Youth to Engage the World. ASCD.
[21]  Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1999) Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Prentice-Hall.
[22]  冯建军. 构建德智体美劳全面培养的教育体系: 理据与思路[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(1): 1-17.
[23]  Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2000) The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
[24]  Piaget, J. (1950) The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge.
[25]  Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
[26]  顾明远. 中国教育路在何方[J]. 教育研究, 2014(3): 4-11.
[27]  叶澜. “生命∙实践”教育学派——在回归与突破中生成[J]. 教育学报, 2013, 9(5): 3-23.
[28]  余谋昌. 生态伦理学: 从理论走向实践[M]. 北京: 首都师范大学出版社, 1999.
[29]  Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
[30]  孙钧. 港珠澳大桥岛隧工程关键技术创新与实践[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(4): 1-10.
[31]  刘宏昭. 航空发动机涡轮叶片精密制造技术研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(13): 1-12.
[32]  饶毅, 黎润红, 张大庆. 中药的科学前沿问题: 青蒿素的发现和发展[J]. 科学文化评论, 2011, 8(4): 29-41.
[33]  李泓. 锂离子电池正极材料研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2017, 6(5): 896-903.
[34]  范长江. 中国的西北角[M]. 北京: 新华出版社, 1980.
[35]  冯惠玲. 档案管理学基础[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015.
[36]  单霁翔. 匠者人心: 故宫文物修复中的工匠精神[J]. 故宫博物院院刊, 2017(5): 3-15.
[37]  斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基. 演员的自我修养[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2016.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133