Context and Justification: As financial services undergo accelerated digitalization, the expansion of electronic transactions within digital wallets increases vulnerabilities to fraud, anomalous behavior, and sophisticated cyberattacks. While this transformation strengthens financial inclusion, it simultaneously exposes systems to risks linked to massive data flows, automated payment mechanisms, and adaptive malicious techniques. In this context, predictive detection of abnormal transactional behaviors becomes a critical component for enhancing cybersecurity, resilience, and digital trust. Problem Statement: The central challenge is to design a model that is both high-performing and explainable, ensuring compliance with ethical and regulatory standards while enabling automatic detection of suspicious activities without compromising algorithmic transparency. Methodology: The study uses 1000 real transaction records generated by 100 users of a mobile operator’s digital wallet service in C?te d’Ivoire, each performing ten typical daily operations (payments, withdrawals, deposits, transfers). All transactions were fully anonymized prior to analysis to ensure confidentiality and adherence to data protection and cybersecurity regulations. Each transaction includes quantitative and categorical features describing monetary behavior (amount, frequency, failure rate, inactivity period) and contextual attributes (location, device type, network). Categorical variables were encoded, and continuous variables normalized for comparability across users and cities. Results: Based on probabilistic evaluation, the Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) model achieved strong intrinsic performance, with a weighted F1-score of 0.83, precision of 0.84, recall of 0.82, AUC-PR of 0.89, and a low log-loss of 0.42. However, hard-label evaluation reveals a macro F1-score of 0.58, with differentiated class-level performance (F1 = 0.42 for normal, 0.67 for suspicious, 0.65 for fraud), indicating a conservative decision profile aimed at minimizing false negatives. Compared with more complex models such as Random Forest or XGBoost, MLR offers a well-balanced compromise between detection capability and interpretability, ensuring full decision traceability required for auditing and regulatory compliance. Conclusion: This research confirms the relevance of MLR as an explainable, robust, and computationally efficient model for multi-class predictive detection in digital wallets. It also opens promising perspectives through the integration
References
[1]
Niu, X., Wang, L. and Yang, X. (2019) A Comparison Study of Credit card Fraud Detection: Supervised versus Unsupervised. arXiv: 1904.10604.
[2]
Ramadugu, R., Doddipatla, L. and Sharma, S.T. (2024) The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Strengthening Digital Wallet Security against Fraud. JournalforReattachTherapyandDevelopmentalDiversities, 6, 2172-2178. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i1.3273
[3]
Iseal, S. and Halli, M. (2025) AI-Powered Fraud Detection in Digital Payment Systems. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202502.0278/v1
[4]
Akinnagbe, O.B. and Akintayo, T.A. (2025) The Impact of Machine Learning on Fraud Detection in Digital Payment. AsianJournalofScience, Technology, Engineering, andArt, 3, 191-209. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajstea.v3i2.4900
[5]
Lenka, S. and Tiwari, R. (2025) Real-Time Fraud Prevention in Digital Wallet Transactions Using CNN-RNN Hybrid Networks. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 54, 533-542.
[6]
Lucas, Y. and Jurgovsky, J. (2020) Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning: A Survey. arXiv: 2010.06479.
[7]
Branco, B., Abreu, P., Gomes, A.S., Almeida, M.S.C., Ascensão, J.T. and Bizarro, P. (2020) Interleaved Sequence RNNs for Fraud Detection. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 6-10 July 2020, 3101-3109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403361
[8]
Deng, R. and Ruan, N. (2019) FraudJudger: Real-World Data-Oriented Fraud Detection on Digital Payment Platforms. arXiv: 1909.02398.
[9]
Deng, R., Ruan, N., Zhang, G. and Zhang, X. (2020) FraudJudger: Fraud Detection on Digital Payment Platforms with Fewer Labels. In: Zhou, J., Luo, X., Shen, Q. and Xu, Z., Eds., Information and Communications Security, Springer, 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41579-2_33
[10]
Kantheti, P.R. and Bvuma, S. (2024) AI and Machine Learning in Fraud Detection: Securing Digital Payments and Economic Stability. InternationalJournalofScientificResearchinScienceandTechnology, 11, 974-982. https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrst52310291
[11]
Janbhasha, S., Kumar, C.H.N.S., Sitharamulu, V., Madhu Babu, B.N.V., Battu, H.R. and Venkataramana, K. (2025) A Hybrid Approach for Fraud Detection in Digital Wallet Transactions Using Adversarial Autoencoders and Gated Recurrent Units. Engineering, Technology&AppliedScienceResearch, 15, 25532-25537. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10898
[12]
Albalawi, T. and Dardouri, S. (2025) Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Traditional and Deep Learning Models with Class Imbalance Mitigation. FrontiersinArtificialIntelligence, 8, Article 1643292. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1643292
[13]
Aburbeian, A.M. and Ashqar, H.I. (2023) Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Enhanced Random Forest Classifier for Imbalanced Data. In: Daimi, K. and Al Sadoon, A., Eds., Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Advances in Computing Research (ACR’23), Springer, 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33743-7_48
[14]
Wang, C., Nie, C. and Liu, Y. (2025) Evaluating Supervised Learning Models for Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Classical and Deep Architectures on Imbalanced Transaction Data. Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Academic Conference on Management Innovation and Economic Development (MIED 2025), Chongqing, 27-29 June 2025, 613-624. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-835-6_65
[15]
Andrade-Arenas, L. and Yactayo-Arias, C. (2025) Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Credit Card Fraud Detection Using SMOTE for Class Imbalance. InternationalJournalofSafetyandSecurityEngineering, 15, 893-901. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.150504
[16]
Shahrul Nadzman, S.A., Tan, G.J., Tan, C.W., Ung, L.L. and Yahya, N. (2025) Fraudulent Credit Card Transaction Detection Using Logistic Regression. JournalofInformationSystemandTechnologyManagement, 10, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.35631/jistm.1038012
[17]
Jin, J. and Zhang, Y. (2025) The Analysis of Fraud Detection in Financial Market under Machine Learning. ScientificReports, 15, Article No. 29959. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15783-2
[18]
Hayat, K. and Magnier, B. (2025) Data Leakage and Deceptive Performance: A Critical Examination of Credit Card Fraud Detection Methodologies. Mathematics, 13, Article 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162563
[19]
Talukder, M.A., Hossen, R., Uddin, M.A., Uddin, M.N. and Acharjee, U.K. (2024) Securing Transactions: A Hybrid Dependable Ensemble Machine Learning Model Using IHT-LR and Grid Search. Cybersecurity, 7, Article No. 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-024-00221-z