Inundation events within the Nong Peung wetland of Pakxan district, Laos, represent a growing environmental and societal challenge, a threat compounded by the interplay of accelerated land use transformations, ongoing deforestation, and the broader impacts of climate change. This study presents the first systematic, geospatial assessment of flood susceptibility for this critical region, filling a significant void in local hazard analysis. We applied an integrated model utilizing a Geographic Information System (GIS) coupled with a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach, using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for the systematic weighting of causative factors. The analysis incorporated nine determinative variables: elevation, slope, annual rainfall, proximity to river channels, drainage density, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), land use/land cover, soil composition, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The resultant susceptibility model stratifies the landscape into five classes, identifying 13.80% of the area as “very high risk” and 20.06% as “high risk.” Cumulatively, our model indicates that more than half (61.42%) of the wetland exhibits moderate to very high susceptibility to flooding. Areas of acute risk are concentrated in the northern and southern portions of the wetland, a spatial pattern directly attributable to a convergence of low elevation, gentle slopes, concentrated rainfall, high drainage density, and predominant agricultural land use. Validation against historical flood records confirms a strong predictive agreement, substantiating the reliability of the AHP-GIS framework for this application. The high-resolution susceptibility map produced by this research offers a foundational, evidence-based tool for enhancing disaster risk reduction strategies and guiding sustainable development in the Pakxan district.
References
[1]
Ajjur, S.B. and Mogheir, Y.K. (2020) Flood Hazard Mapping Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS (Case Study Gaza Governorate, Palestine). ArabianJournalofGeosciences, 13, Article No. 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-5024-6
[2]
Allafta, H. and Opp, C. (2021) GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis for Flood Prone Areas Mapping in the Trans-Boundary Shatt Al-Arab Basin, Iraq-Iran. Geomatics, NaturalHazardsandRisk, 12, 2087-2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1955755
[3]
Arseni, M., Rosu, A., Calmuc, M., Calmuc, V.A., Iticescu, C. and Georgescu, L.P. (2020) Development of Flood Risk and Hazard Maps for the Lower Course of the Siret River, Romania. Sustainability, 12, Article No. 6588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166588
[4]
Aydin, M.C. and Sevgi Birincioğlu, E. (2022) Flood Risk Analysis Using Gis-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of Bitlis Province. AppliedWaterScience, 12, Article No. 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01655-x
[5]
Chakraborty, S. and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019) Assessing Flood Risk Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographical Information System (GIS): Application in Coochbehar District of West Bengal, India. NaturalHazards, 99, 247-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03737-7
[6]
WBG-ADB (2021) Climate Risk Country Profile: Lao PDR.
GoL (2018) The Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA).
[10]
Roberts, T., Parker, D.M., Bulterys, P.L., Rattanavong, S., Elliott, I., Phommasone, K., et al. (2021) A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Scrub Typhus and Murine Typhus in Laos; Implications from Changing Landscapes and Climate. PLOSNeglectedTropicalDiseases, 15, e0009685. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009685
[11]
Abdelkarim, A., Al-Alola, S.S., Alogayell, H.M., Mohamed, S.A., Alkadi, I.I. and Ismail, I.Y. (2020) Integration of GIS-Based Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process to Assess Flood Hazard on the Al-Shamal Train Pathway in Al-Qurayyat Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Water, 12, Article No. 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061702
[12]
Mukherjee, R. and Deb, P. (2023) Application of GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process for Assessment and Mapping of Flood Risk Zone in the Lower Ramganga River Basin, Western Gangetic Plain, India. Environment, DevelopmentandSustainability, 26, 6163-6193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02957-z
[13]
Osman, S.A. and Das, J. (2023) Gis-based Flood Risk Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Shebelle River Basin in Southern Somalia. SNAppliedSciences, 5, Article No. 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05360-5
[14]
Saaty, T.L. (1990) How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. EuropeanJournalofOperationalResearch, 48, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i
[15]
Das, S. and Pardeshi, S.D. (2017) Comparative Analysis of Lineaments Extracted from Cartosat, SRTM and ASTER DEM: A Study Based on Four Watersheds in Konkan Region, India. SpatialInformationResearch, 26, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0155-x
[16]
Pimenta, L., Duarte, L., Teodoro, A.C., Beltrão, N., Gomes, D. and Oliveira, R. (2025) Gis-based Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using AHP in the Urban Amazon: A Case Study of Ananindeua, Brazil. Land, 14, Article No. 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14081543
[17]
Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Apel, H., Barredo, J.I., Bates, P.D., Feyen, L., et al. (2012) Comparative Flood Damage Model Assessment: Towards a European Approach. NaturalHazardsandEarthSystemSciences, 12, 3733-3752. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012
[18]
Süzen, M.L. and Doyuran, V. (2004) A Comparison of the GIS Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Methods: Multivariate versus Bivariate. EnvironmentalGeology, 45, 665-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0917-8
[19]
Valjarević, A., Popovici, C., Štilić, A. and Radojković, M. (2022) Cloudiness and Water from Cloud Seeding in Connection with Plants Distribution in the Republic of Moldova. AppliedWaterScience, 12, Article No. 262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01784-3
[20]
Waseem, M., Ahmad, S., Ahmad, I., Wahab, H. and Leta, M.K. (2023) Urban Flood Risk Assessment Using AHP and Geospatial Techniques in Swat Pakistan. SNAppliedSciences, 5, Article No. 215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05445-1
[21]
Westra, S., Fowler, H.J., Evans, J.P., Alexander, L.V., Berg, P., Johnson, F., et al. (2014) Future Changes to the Intensity and Frequency of Short-Duration Extreme Rainfall. ReviewsofGeophysics, 52, 522-555. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014rg000464
[22]
Sendek, A., Kretz, L., van der Plas, F., Seele-Dilbat, C., Schulz-Zunkel, C., Vieweg, M., et al. (2021) Topographical Factors Related to Flooding Frequency Promote Ecosystem Multifunctionality of Riparian Floodplains. EcologicalIndicators, 132, Article ID: 108312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108312
[23]
Quagliolo, C., Comino, E. and Pezzoli, A. (2021) Experimental Flash Floods Assessment through Urban Flood Risk Mitigation (UFRM) Model: The Case Study of Ligurian Coastal Cities. FrontiersinWater, 3, Article ID: 663378. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.663378