全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

An Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Detail Transfer for Few-View Computed Tomography

DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2025.164004, PP. 45-57

Keywords: CT Reconstruction, Detail Transfer, FBP, SART

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Computed Tomography (CT) is widely used in medical diagnosis. Filtered Back Projection (FBP), a traditional analytical method, is commonly used in clinical CT to preserve high-frequency details but introduces streak artifacts in few-view data. In contrast, iterative reconstruction algorithms improve image quality by incorporating accurate models of imaging physics and noise. However, they often require explicit regularization or specialized network architectures, leading to complex optimization challenges. This paper proposes an iterative reconstruction algorithm based on detail transfer (DT), which requires the prior detail information extracted from the FBP-reconstructed image. Specifically, the detail information extracted from the FBP-reconstructed image is combined with the SART reconstruction results using mask-allocated weights to generate the initial value for the iterative reconstruction process. During the iterations, as characteristics of iterative algorithm, the low-frequency information is restored first and high-frequency information is gradually recovered, the extracted detail information is weighted with the iteratively reconstructed image to accelerate the restoration of high-frequency information. This approach speeds up the convergence of the algorithm. The iterative reconstruction algorithm adopts the Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART), and thus, the proposed method is referred to as SART-DT. Experimental results show that SART-DT effectively removes artifacts and restores details, offering superior reconstruction quality and better preservation of fine details compared to other methods.

References

[1]  Radon, J. (1983) Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre Integralwerte längs gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten. 71-86.
[2]  Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C. and Kress, J.W. (1984) Practical Cone-Beam Algorithm. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 612-619.
https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.1.000612
[3]  Flores, L., Vidal, V. and Verdú, G. (2015) Iterative Reconstruction from Few-View Projections. Procedia Computer Science, 51, 703-712.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.188
[4]  Gordon, R., Bender, R. and Herman, G.T. (1970) Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques (ART) for Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Photography. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 29, 471-481.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90109-8
[5]  Andersen, A. (1984) Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the ART Algorithm. Ultrasonic Imaging, 6, 81-94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-7
[6]  Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Ma, X. and Xu, Y. (2022) A Content-Adaptive Unstructured Grid Based Regularized CT Reconstruction Method with a SART-Type Preconditioned Fixed-Point Proximity Algorithm. Inverse Problems, 38, Article ID: 035005.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ac490f
[7]  Chee, G., O’Connell, D., Yang, Y.M., Singhrao, K., Low, D.A. and Lewis, J.H. (2019) McSART: An Iterative Model-Based, Motion-Compensated SART Algorithm for CBCT Reconstruction. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 64, Article ID: 095013.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab07d6
[8]  Greffier, J., Frandon, J., Larbi, A., Beregi, J.P. and Pereira, F. (2019) CT Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms: A Task-Based Image Quality Assessment. European Radiology, 30, 487-500.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06359-6
[9]  Stiller, W. (2018) Basics of Iterative Reconstruction Methods in Computed Tomography: A Vendor-Independent Overview. European Journal of Radiology, 109, 147-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.025
[10]  Huang, Z., Ye, S., McCann, M.T. and Ravishankar, S. (2023) Model-Based Reconstruction with Learning: From Unsupervised to Supervised and Beyond. In: Ye, J.C., Eldar, Y.C. and Unser, M., Eds., Deep Learning for Biomedical Image Reconstruction, Cambridge University Press, 28-52.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042529.005
[11]  Kumar, D., Parkinson, D.Y. and Donatelli, J.J. (2024) tomoCAM: Fast Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction via GPU Acceleration and Non-Uniform Fast Fourier Transforms. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, 31, 85-94.
https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600577523008962
[12]  Song, B., Shen, L. and Xing, L. (2023) PINER: Prior-Informed Implicit Neural Representation Learning for Test-Time Adaptation in Sparse-View CT Reconstruction. 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, 2-7 January 2023, 1928-1937.
https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00197
[13]  Lei, J. and Liu, Q.B. (2022) Semi-Supervised Learning-Assisted Imaging Method for Electrical Capacitance Tomography. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 106, 126-149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.01.027
[14]  He, K., Sun, J. and Tang, X. (2013) Guided Image Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35, 1397-1409.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2012.213
[15]  Petschnigg, G., Szeliski, R., Agrawala, M., Cohen, M., Hoppe, H. and Toyama, K. (2004) Digital Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23, 664-672.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1015706.1015777
[16]  Qu, G., Wang, C. and Jiang, M. (2009) Necessary and Sufficient Convergence Conditions for Algebraic Image Reconstruction Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18, 435-440.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2008.2008076
[17]  Han, G., Qu, G. and Jiang, M. (2016) Relaxation Strategy for the Landweber Method. Signal Processing, 125, 87-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.01.010
[18]  Censor, Y., Elfving, T., Herman, G.T. and Nikazad, T. (2008) On Diagonally Relaxed Orthogonal Projection Methods. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30, 473-504.
https://doi.org/10.1137/050639399
[19]  Shashua, A. and Riklin-Raviv, T. (2001) The Quotient Image: Class-Based Re-Rendering and Recognition with Varying Illuminations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23, 129-139.
https://doi.org/10.1109/34.908964
[20]  Liu, Z., Shan, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2001) Expressive Expression Mapping with Ratio Images. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, 12-17 August 2001, 271-276.
https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383289
[21]  Yu, H. and Wang, G. (2010) A Soft-Threshold Filtering Approach for Reconstruction from a Limited Number of Projections. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 55, 3905-3916.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/022
[22]  Yu, W., Wang, C., Nie, X., Huang, M. and Wu, L. (2017) Image Reconstruction for Few-View Computed Tomography Based on ℓ0 Sparse Regularization. Procedia Computer Science, 107, 808-813.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.178
[23]  Ji, D., Qu, G. and Liu, B. (2016) Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique Based on Guided Image Filtering. Optics Express, 24, Article No. 15897.
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.24.015897
[24]  Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R. and Simoncelli, E.P. (2004) Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 600-612.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2003.819861
[25]  Storath, M., Weinmann, A., Frikel, J. and Unser, M. (2015) Joint Image Reconstruction and Segmentation Using the Potts Model. Inverse Problems, 31, Article ID: 025003.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/31/2/025003
[26]  Tang, K., Yang, J. and Wang, J. (2014) Investigating Haze-Relevant Features in a Learning Framework for Image Dehazing. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, 23-28 June 2014, 2995-3002.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2014.383

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133