Maritime transportation is increasingly being subjected to pressure to balance economic efficiency with environmental sustainability under regulatory frameworks such as global trade demands and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) greenhouse gas (GHG) strategy. This study proposes a multi-objective ship route optimization framework that combines the Extended A* algorithm with a physically-based ship performance model to jointly optimize speeds and routes to minimize fuel and time costs while satisfying navigational constraints. The framework discretizes the ocean area into a high-resolution grid and introduces no-go zones through a binary mask, where the navigable area accounts for 65.5% of the entire area. The model uses a weighted cost function to jointly optimize constant speed and route. Taking an 80,000-ton Panamax bulk carrier from Singapore to Tianjin as an example, the model yields an optimal speed of 16 knots, a total cost of US $268619.81, a fuel consumption of 216.30 tons, and a sailing time of 180.7 hours, which is a cost reduction of 10.2% compared to the benchmark scenario of 24 knots (with a total cost of about US $465,000). Although not explicitly optimized for carbon cost, the linear relationship between fuel and emissions ensures a proportional reduction in CO2 emissions, helping to meet Carbon Intensity Index (CII) requirements. The algorithm takes only 52 seconds per scenario on standard hardware, improving computational efficiency by a factor of 10 - 20 over evolutionary class algorithms and supporting near real-time decision making. The framework has good reproducibility and can be integrated with the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS), making it suitable for digital and sustainable shipping operations.
References
[1]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2024) Review of Maritime Transport 2024. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2024_en.pdf
[2]
International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2023) 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. IMO. https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/2023-imo-strategy-on-reduction-of-ghg-emissions-from-ships.aspx
[3]
Luo, X., Yan, R. and Wang, S. (2023) Comparison of Deterministic and Ensemble Weather Forecasts on Ship Sailing Speed Optimization. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 121, Article ID: 103801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103801
[4]
Lo, H.K. and McCord, M.R. (1998) Adaptive Ship Routing through Stochastic Ocean Currents: General Formulations and Empirical Results. TransportationResearchPartA: PolicyandPractice, 32, 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-8564(98)00018-4
[5]
Norstad, I., Fagerholt, K. and Laporte, G. (2011) Tramp Ship Routing and Scheduling with Speed Optimization. TransportationResearchPartC: EmergingTechnologies, 19, 853-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.001
[6]
Kontovas, C.A. (2014) The Green Ship Routing and Scheduling Problem (GSRSP): A Conceptual Approach. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 31, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.014
[7]
Psaraftis, H.N. and Kontovas, C.A. (2014) Ship Speed Optimization: Concepts, Models and Combined Speed-Routing Scenarios. TransportationResearchPartC: EmergingTechnologies, 44, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.001
[8]
Kepaptsoglou, K., Fountas, G. and Karlaftis, M.G. (2015) Weather Impact on Containership Routing in Closed Seas: A Chance-Constraint Optimization Approach. TransportationResearchPartC: EmergingTechnologies, 55, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.027
[9]
Taskar, B. and Andersen, P. (2020) Benefit of Speed Reduction for Ships in Different Weather Conditions. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 85, Article ID: 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102337
[10]
Tillig, F., Ringsberg, J.W., Psaraftis, H.N. and Zis, T. (2020) Reduced Environmental Impact of Marine Transport through Speed Reduction and Wind Assisted Propulsion. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 83, Article ID: 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102380
Luo, X., Yan, R. and Wang, S. (2024) Ship Sailing Speed Optimization Considering Dynamic Meteorological Conditions. TransportationResearchPartC: EmergingTechnologies, 167, Article ID: 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104827
[13]
Wen, M., Pacino, D., Kontovas, C.A. and Psaraftis, H.N. (2017) A Multiple Ship Routing and Speed Optimization Problem under Time, Cost and Environmental Objectives. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 52, 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.009
[14]
Fagerholt, K., Gausel, N.T., Rakke, J.G. and Psaraftis, H.N. (2015) Maritime Routing and Speed Optimization with Emission Control Areas. TransportationResearchPartC: EmergingTechnologies, 52, 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010
[15]
Du, Y., Meng, Q., Wang, S. and Kuang, H. (2019) Two-phase Optimal Solutions for Ship Speed and Trim Optimization over a Voyage Using Voyage Report Data. TransportationResearchPartB: Methodological, 122, 88-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.004
[16]
Sheng, D., Meng, Q. and Li, Z. (2019) Optimal Vessel Speed and Fleet Size for Industrial Shipping Services under the Emission Control Area Regulation. TransportationResearchPartC: EmergingTechnologies, 105, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.038
[17]
Bouman, E.A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A.I. and Strømman, A.H. (2017) State-Of-The-Art Technologies, Measures, and Potential for Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping—A Review. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 52, 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
[18]
Meyer, T. (2020) Decarbonizing Road Freight Transportation—A Bibliometric and Network Analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89, Article ID: 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102619
[19]
Sung, I., Zografakis, H. and Nielsen, P. (2022) Multi-Lateral Ocean Voyage Optimization for Cargo Vessels as a Decarbonization Method. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 110, Article ID: 103407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103407
[20]
Alam, M., Rakib, A.K.M., Hasan, A.S.M.M., Siddique, M.N.I., Kabir, M.A. and Trianni, A. (2025) Decarbonizing Road Transportation: Barriers and Drivers in an Emerging Economy Context. TransportationResearchPartD: TransportandEnvironment, 143, Article ID: 104723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104723
[21]
Zis, T.P.V., Psaraftis, H.N., Tillig, F. and Ringsberg, J.W. (2020) Decarbonizing Maritime Transport: A Ro-Pax Case Study. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37, Article ID: 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100565
[22]
Tran, T.T., Browne, T., Veitch, B., Musharraf, M. and Peters, D. (2023) Route Optimization for Vessels in Ice: Investigating Operational Implications of the Carbon Intensity Indicator Regulation. MarinePolicy, 158, Article ID: 105858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105858
[23]
Li, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, J. and Wu, B. (2025) Joint Optimization of Route and Speed for Methanol Dual-Fuel Powered Ships Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm. BigDataandCognitiveComputing, 9, Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9040090