全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Multi-Objective Marine Route Optimization Based on Extended A* Algorithm and Ship Performance Models

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2025.154023, PP. 507-521

Keywords: Multi-Objective Optimization, A* Algorithm, Decarbonization, Fuel Efficiency, Navigational Constraints

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Maritime transportation is increasingly being subjected to pressure to balance economic efficiency with environmental sustainability under regulatory frameworks such as global trade demands and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) greenhouse gas (GHG) strategy. This study proposes a multi-objective ship route optimization framework that combines the Extended A* algorithm with a physically-based ship performance model to jointly optimize speeds and routes to minimize fuel and time costs while satisfying navigational constraints. The framework discretizes the ocean area into a high-resolution grid and introduces no-go zones through a binary mask, where the navigable area accounts for 65.5% of the entire area. The model uses a weighted cost function to jointly optimize constant speed and route. Taking an 80,000-ton Panamax bulk carrier from Singapore to Tianjin as an example, the model yields an optimal speed of 16 knots, a total cost of US $268619.81, a fuel consumption of 216.30 tons, and a sailing time of 180.7 hours, which is a cost reduction of 10.2% compared to the benchmark scenario of 24 knots (with a total cost of about US $465,000). Although not explicitly optimized for carbon cost, the linear relationship between fuel and emissions ensures a proportional reduction in CO2 emissions, helping to meet Carbon Intensity Index (CII) requirements. The algorithm takes only 52 seconds per scenario on standard hardware, improving computational efficiency by a factor of 10 - 20 over evolutionary class algorithms and supporting near real-time decision making. The framework has good reproducibility and can be integrated with the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS), making it suitable for digital and sustainable shipping operations.

References

[1]  United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2024) Review of Maritime Transport 2024. UNCTAD.
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2024_en.pdf
[2]  International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2023) 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. IMO.
https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/2023-imo-strategy-on-reduction-of-ghg-emissions-from-ships.aspx
[3]  Luo, X., Yan, R. and Wang, S. (2023) Comparison of Deterministic and Ensemble Weather Forecasts on Ship Sailing Speed Optimization. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 121, Article ID: 103801.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103801
[4]  Lo, H.K. and McCord, M.R. (1998) Adaptive Ship Routing through Stochastic Ocean Currents: General Formulations and Empirical Results. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32, 547-561.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-8564(98)00018-4
[5]  Norstad, I., Fagerholt, K. and Laporte, G. (2011) Tramp Ship Routing and Scheduling with Speed Optimization. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19, 853-865.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.001
[6]  Kontovas, C.A. (2014) The Green Ship Routing and Scheduling Problem (GSRSP): A Conceptual Approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 61-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.014
[7]  Psaraftis, H.N. and Kontovas, C.A. (2014) Ship Speed Optimization: Concepts, Models and Combined Speed-Routing Scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 44, 52-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.001
[8]  Kepaptsoglou, K., Fountas, G. and Karlaftis, M.G. (2015) Weather Impact on Containership Routing in Closed Seas: A Chance-Constraint Optimization Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 55, 139-155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.027
[9]  Taskar, B. and Andersen, P. (2020) Benefit of Speed Reduction for Ships in Different Weather Conditions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 85, Article ID: 102337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102337
[10]  Tillig, F., Ringsberg, J.W., Psaraftis, H.N. and Zis, T. (2020) Reduced Environmental Impact of Marine Transport through Speed Reduction and Wind Assisted Propulsion. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, Article ID: 102380.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102380
[11]  Lee, S., Sun, Q. and Meng, Q. (2023) Vessel Weather Routing Subject to Sulfur Emission Regulation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 177, Article ID: 103235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103235
[12]  Luo, X., Yan, R. and Wang, S. (2024) Ship Sailing Speed Optimization Considering Dynamic Meteorological Conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 167, Article ID: 104827.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104827
[13]  Wen, M., Pacino, D., Kontovas, C.A. and Psaraftis, H.N. (2017) A Multiple Ship Routing and Speed Optimization Problem under Time, Cost and Environmental Objectives. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 303-321.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.009
[14]  Fagerholt, K., Gausel, N.T., Rakke, J.G. and Psaraftis, H.N. (2015) Maritime Routing and Speed Optimization with Emission Control Areas. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 52, 57-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010
[15]  Du, Y., Meng, Q., Wang, S. and Kuang, H. (2019) Two-phase Optimal Solutions for Ship Speed and Trim Optimization over a Voyage Using Voyage Report Data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 122, 88-114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.004
[16]  Sheng, D., Meng, Q. and Li, Z. (2019) Optimal Vessel Speed and Fleet Size for Industrial Shipping Services under the Emission Control Area Regulation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 37-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.038
[17]  Bouman, E.A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A.I. and Strømman, A.H. (2017) State-Of-The-Art Technologies, Measures, and Potential for Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping—A Review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408-421.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
[18]  Meyer, T. (2020) Decarbonizing Road Freight Transportation—A Bibliometric and Network Analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89, Article ID: 102619.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102619
[19]  Sung, I., Zografakis, H. and Nielsen, P. (2022) Multi-Lateral Ocean Voyage Optimization for Cargo Vessels as a Decarbonization Method. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 110, Article ID: 103407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103407
[20]  Alam, M., Rakib, A.K.M., Hasan, A.S.M.M., Siddique, M.N.I., Kabir, M.A. and Trianni, A. (2025) Decarbonizing Road Transportation: Barriers and Drivers in an Emerging Economy Context. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 143, Article ID: 104723.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104723
[21]  Zis, T.P.V., Psaraftis, H.N., Tillig, F. and Ringsberg, J.W. (2020) Decarbonizing Maritime Transport: A Ro-Pax Case Study. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37, Article ID: 100565.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100565
[22]  Tran, T.T., Browne, T., Veitch, B., Musharraf, M. and Peters, D. (2023) Route Optimization for Vessels in Ice: Investigating Operational Implications of the Carbon Intensity Indicator Regulation. Marine Policy, 158, Article ID: 105858.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105858
[23]  Li, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, J. and Wu, B. (2025) Joint Optimization of Route and Speed for Methanol Dual-Fuel Powered Ships Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9, Article 90.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9040090

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133