全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Risk-Aware AI Models for Financial Fraud Detection: Scalable Inference from Big Transactional Data

DOI: 10.4236/ijis.2025.154009, PP. 162-183

Keywords: Financial Fraud, Artificial Intelligence, Hybrid Models, Risk Profiling, Scalable Inference, SHAP, Explainable AI, Anomaly Detection, Real-Time Fraud Detection, Feature Engineering, Model Deployment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a scalable, risk-aware artificial intelligence (AI) framework capable of detecting financial fraud in high-throughput digital transaction environments. The research addresses the limitations of traditional rule-based and single-model systems, which often suffer from high false positives, poor adaptability, and limited interpretability. By combining supervised machine learning, unsupervised anomaly detection, and engineered domain-specific risk features, the proposed hybrid architecture aims to enhance precision, recall, and transparency. The framework is designed to meet stringent regulatory and operational requirements, making it deployable across banks, fintechs, digital wallets, and other institutions handling large volumes of transactions. Design/Methodology/Approach: The framework integrates a modular, five-layer architecture: 1) real-time multi-source data ingestion, 2) domain-driven risk feature engineering, 3) hybrid AI inference combining XGBoost and autoencoder models, 4) interpretability via SHAP and counterfactual reasoning, and 5) seamless decisioning and integration with downstream fraud operations. Distributed cloud-native infrastructure using Kafka, Spark, Kubernetes, and ONNX Runtime ensures scalability and low latency. Training leverages imbalanced financial datasets using advanced sampling techniques and time-series aware cross-validation. Continuous monitoring for data drift, fairness, and explainability supports compliance. Experimental validation was conducted using over 100 million anonymized transactions from multinational banking partners under production-like conditions. Findings: The hybrid framework achieved significant improvements over legacy systems and single-model baselines. Precision, recall, and F1-score reached 0.94, 0.93, and 0.935, respectively, outperforming rule-based approaches by over 35%. Median inference latency was reduced to 126 ms under 10,000 transactions per second, supporting real-time operations. SHAP-based interpretability and counterfactual reasoning provided transaction-level explanations, meeting regulatory transparency requirements. Top-1% alerting achieved a 92% fraud hit rate, reducing analyst workload. Data drift monitoring maintained model stability for over 90 days post-deployment. These findings demonstrate that hybrid AI designs can balance speed, accuracy, scalability, and auditability for modern fraud detection. Research

References

[1]  Carcillo, F., Le Borgne, Y., Caelen, O., Kessaci, Y., Oblé, F. and Bontempi, G. (2021) Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Learning in Credit Card Fraud Detection. Information Sciences, 557, 317-331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.042
[2]  Pozzolo, A.D., Caelen, O., Johnson, R.A. and Bontempi, G. (2015) Calibrating Probability with Undersampling for Unbalanced Classification. 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, Cape Town, 7-10 December 2015, 159-166.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ssci.2015.33
[3]  Lundberg, S.M. and Lee, S.I. (2017) A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Proceedings of NeurIPS, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 4765-4774.
[4]  Goldstein, M. and Uchida, S. (2016) A Comparative Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Multivariate Data. PLOS ONE, 11, e0152173.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152173
[5]  Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S. and Guestrin, C. (2016) “Why Should I Trust You?”: Ex-plaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, 13-17 August 2016, 1135-1144.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
[6]  Zhang, C., Song, D., Chen, Y., Feng, X., Lumezanu, C., Cheng, W., Ni, J. and Zong, B. (2019) A Deep Learning Based Behavior Analysis Approach for Fraud Detection. arXiv: 1901.08665.
[7]  Blanchard, G., Clemmensen, L. and Lübbecke, M. (2021) Federated Learning for Fraud Detection: Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE Access, 9, 125046-125061.
[8]  Bontempi, G., Le Borgne, Y.A. and Caelen, O. (2022) Scalable Machine Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Review. Future Generation Computer Systems, 135, 388-404.
[9]  Doshi-Velez, F. and Kim, B. (2017) Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv: 1702.08608.
[10]  Xu, H., Caramanis, C. and Mannor, S. (2020) Explainable AI for Anomaly Detection in Financial Systems. Proceedings of ACM CIKM, Galway, 19-23 October 2020, 1095-1104.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133