Centrifugation preparation has been the mainstay of ART sperm preparation since the procedure was first introduced in 1978. However, recent studies have suggested that commonly used collection and preparatory techniques, such as centrifugation, may negatively impact sperm cell function. Recently, a number of devices have been introduced to select sperm using a physical barrier. While these barrier techniques show great promise, most have been described as only working with freshly ejaculated sperm. As the less motile cryopreserved cells seem to lack the ability to penetrate the barriers. However, one of the newest systems, the NovoSort (NS; Reproductive Solutions Frisco, TX), uses a different barrier system that appears to harvest a higher percentage of motile cells and allows processing of whole ejaculates. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the system, with its unique barrier design, could be successfully adapted for use with frozen samples, particularly low-volume commercial samples, to enhance the motile population of sperm cells used in ART procedures. By design, the NS is intended for use with a ProteX collection cup (PX; Reproductive Solutions). The NS, containing 0.75 - 1.0 mL of media, is then lowered into the native ejaculate in the PX, allowing cells to migrate through the barrier into the clean media. While the design works well with a normal ejaculate, its design requires a volume of a minimum of 1 mL in the PX in order for it to make contact with the mesh of NS. As most commercial samples are both low volume (0.5 mL) and have relatively low motile concentrations, the standard technique is not an option. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to develop a technique that would allow the use of the NS barrier method with cryopreserved samples. In a series of preliminary experiments, it was found that the locations of the media and the native sample within the system could be reversed, creating the necessary contact between the sample, mesh, and media to facilitate sperm migration. To test the effectiveness of the modified protocol for motile cell recovery, 8 donated cryopreserved samples were thawed, and 0.5 mL of the sample, to mimic commercial samples, was placed in the NS. The NS was then placed in the PX, which contained 1 mL of culture media, and incubated for 1 hr. The outer media were then sampled at times 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes to assess the presence and concentration of motile sperm. These data were then compared to the native concentration and forward progression at thaw. Results suggest
References
[1]
HHS.gov. (2024) Fact Sheet: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Use Across the United States.
[2]
Jiang, V.S. and Bormann, C.L. (2023) Artificial Intelligence in the in Vitro Fertilization Laboratory: A Review of Advancements over the Last Decade. FertilityandSterility, 120, 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.149
[3]
Bosch, E., De Vos, M. and Humaidan, P. (2020) The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. FrontiersinEndocrinology, 11, Article 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00067
[4]
Vallet-Buisan, M., Mecca, R., Jones, C., Coward, K. and Yeste, M. (2023) Contribution of Semen to Early Embryo Development: Fertilization and Beyond. HumanReproductionUpdate, 29, 395-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad006
[5]
Sciorio, R. and Rinaudo, P. (2023) Culture Conditions in the IVF Laboratory: State of the ART and Possible New Directions. JournalofAssistedReproductionandGenetics, 40, 2591-2607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02934-5
[6]
Rappa, K.L., Rodriguez, H.F., Hakkarainen, G.C., Anchan, R.M., Mutter, G.L. and Asghar, W. (2016) Sperm Processing for Advanced Reproductive Technologies: Where Are We Today? BiotechnologyAdvances, 34, 578-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.01.007
[7]
Yamauchi, Y., Riel, J.M. and Ward, M.A. (2012) Paternal DNA Damage Resulting from Various Sperm Treatments Persists after Fertilization and Is Similar before and after DNA Replication. JournalofAndrology, 33, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.111.013532
[8]
Simopoulou, M., Gkoles, L., Bakas, P., Giannelou, P., Kalampokas, T., Pantos, K., et al. (2016) Improving ICSI: A Review from the Spermatozoon Perspective. SystemsBiologyinReproductiveMedicine, 62, 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2016.1229365
[9]
Simopoulou, M., Giannelou, P., Bakas, P., Gkoles, L., Kalampokas, T., Pantos, K. and Koutsilieris, M. (2016) Making ICSI Safer and More Effective: A Review of the Human Oocyte and ICSI Practice. In Vivo, 30, 387-400.
[10]
Kimelman, D. and Pavone, M.E. (2021) Non-invasive Prenatal Testing in the Context of IVF and PGT-A. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 70, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.07.004
[11]
Prien, S., Moseley, T., Singh-Sharma, N., Liebermann, J., VerMilyea, M.D. and Penrose, L.L. (2023) A Simple One-Step System Enhances the Availability of High-Quality Sperm for Assisted Reproductive Procedures. OpenJournalofObstetricsandGynecology, 13, 1676-1687. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2023.1310141
[12]
Liebermann, J., Randall, S., Wagner, Y., Penrose, L.L. and Prien, S.D. (2025) Evaluation of a One-Step Sperm Isolation Device: Clinical Outcomes Compared to Traditional Techniques. OpenJournalofObstetricsandGynecology, 15, 647-654. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2025.153053
[13]
Hsu, C., Lee, C., Lin, F., Wang, F., Chang, H., Wang, T., et al. (2023) Live Motile Sperm Sorting Device for Enhanced Sperm-Fertilization Competency: Comparative Analysis with Density-Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Sperm Sorting. JournalofAssistedReproductionandGenetics, 40, 1855-1864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02838-4
[14]
Zaha, I., Naghi, P., Stefan, L., Bunescu, C., Radu, M., Muresan, M.E., et al. (2023) Comparative Study of Sperm Selection Techniques for Pregnancy Rates in an Unselected IVF-ICSI Population. JournalofPersonalizedMedicine, 13, Article 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040619
[15]
Niederberger, C., Pellicer, A., Cohen, J., Gardner, D.K., Palermo, G.D., O’Neill, C.L., et al. (2018) Forty Years of IVF. FertilityandSterility, 110, 185-324.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
[16]
Inaudi, P. (2002) Reduction of Steps in the Preparation of Motile Sperm for Intrauterine Insemination Does Not Reduce Efficacy of the Procedure: Simplified One-Step Swim-Up Method versus Classic Swim-Up. HumanReproduction, 17, 1288-1291. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1288
[17]
McClure, R.D., Nunes, L. and Tom, R. (1989) Semen Manipulation: Improved Sperm Recovery and Function with a Two-Layer Percoll Gradient. FertilityandSterility, 51, 874-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60683-0
[18]
Johnson, D.E., Confino, E. and Jeyendran, R.S. (1996) Glass Wool Column Filtration versus Mini-Percoll Gradient for Processing Poor Quality Semen Samples. FertilityandSterility, 66, 459-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58519-7
[19]
Sterzik, K., Strehler, E., De Santo, M., Uhlich, S., Rosenbusch, B. and Kreienberg, R. (1994) Verursachen Präparationstechniken ultrastrukturelle Spermienschäden? Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 54, 580-584. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1022343
[20]
Baguhl, F., Fliess, F.R. and Bernt, W.D. (1989) Effekt der Glaswollfiltration auf humane Spermato-zoen-ein Vergleich mit der Swim-up-Technik [The Effect of Glass Wool Filtration on Human Spermatozoa—A Comparison with the Swim-Up Technic]. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, 111, 1613-1616.
[21]
Guérin, J.F., Mathieu, C., Lornage, J., Pinatel, M.C. and Boulieu, D. (1989) Improvement of Survival and Fertilizing Capacity of Human Spermatozoa in an IVF Programme by Selection on Discontinuous Percoll Gradients. HumanReproduction, 4, 798-804. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136989
[22]
Larsen, E.C., Christiansen, O.B., Kolte, A.M. and Macklon, N. (2013) New Insights into Mechanisms behind Miscarriage. BMCMedicine, 11, Article No. 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-154
[23]
Bach, P.V. and Schlegel, P.N. (2016) Sperm DNA Damage and Its Role in IVF and ICSI. BasicandClinicalAndrology, 26, Article No. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-016-0043-6
[24]
Jarvi, K. (2020) High Sperm DNA Damage: Does Testicular Sperm Make Sense? UrologicClinicsofNorthAmerica, 47, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2019.12.009
[25]
McQueen, D.B., Zhang, J. and Robins, J.C. (2019) Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. FertilityandSterility, 112, 54-60.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.003
[26]
Prien, S.D. (2014) A Novel Collection Technique for the Improvement of Semen Quality. JournalofDairy, Veterinary&AnimalResearch, 1, 4-7. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2014.01.00002
[27]
Prien, S., Johnson, D., Welch, L., Kauffman, R. and Penrose, L. (2023) Semen Collection in a Device Specifically Designed for Human Semen Improves Sample Physiological and Morphological Parameters. Archives of Health Sciences, 7, 1-8.
[28]
Kauffman, R.P., Welch, L., Prien, S.D. and Phy, J. (2012) Early Fertility Trials of a Semen Collection Device Previously Demonstrated to Improve Semen Parameters and Pregnancy Rates in Animal Models. FertilityandSterility, 98, S249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.907
[29]
Prien, S.D., Forman, E.C., William, Z. and Johnson, D. (2025) Early Clinical Outcomes in an IVF Program Using ICSI Following Sample Collection in a Device Specifically Designed for Semen Collection (ProteX) vs a Standard Specimen Cup. OpenJournalofObstetricsandGynecology, 15, 639-646. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2025.153052
[30]
Prien, S.D., Sillivent, M., Borland, A. and Penrose, L.L. (2024) Impact of the Collection Environment on Sperm Physiology and Biochemistry and Its Implications for Long-Term Outcomes. FertilityandSterility, 122, e124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.402