全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

First Use of a Modified Specific Gravity Device to Determine the Viability and Development Potential of Human Cryopreserved Embryos

DOI: 10.4236/arsci.2025.133013, PP. 153-161

Keywords: Embryos, Buoyancy, Noninvasive Testing, Blastocyst, Selection

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objective: Embryo cryopreservation is currently the only effective means for long-term storage, transport, and genetic testing of human and animal embryos. It also allows significant flexibility in scheduling ART procedures in fertility clinics. However, cryopreservation can also lead to embryo damage, affecting embryo viability and health. Previous research from this lab has demonstrated that a Modified Specific Gravity Device (MSGD) can be used to determine viability status and to predict the future development of embryos in various animal species. The current study describes the first use of the MSGD to determine post-thaw viability and development potential of donated cryopreserved human blastocyst stage embryos. Materials and Methods: A series of 192 vitrified blastocyst stage embryos (both non-biopsied and biopsied) from 44 patients were donated for research. After some initial testing, it was determined that only non-biopsied embryos should be passed through the MSGD to determine their buoyancy and drop time. Therefore, only 21 straws containing 27 non-biopsied embryos were used in this study. Embryos were first thawed using standard clinical laboratory techniques. Once thawed, the diameter of the zona pellucida of each embryo was estimated by using a microscope lens micrometer, the re-expansion status of the embryos was noted, the embryo was then dropped through the MSGD and placed in culture for 3 hrs at 37?C. After 3 hrs, each step was repeated and then embryos were returned to culture for 24 hrs to determine hatching. Statistical analyses were made comparing embryos that expanded by 3 hrs and hatched by 24 hrs to their descent time through the MSGD. Results: To date, we have completed data collection for 27 embryos. It was observed that most embryos at the initial time point did not demonstrate any expansion, and no differences were seen in their initial drop times (P = 0.754). However, at 3 hrs in culture, re-expanded embryos dropped more slowly through MSGD than those that did not expand (P < 0.04). Embryos that hatched had faster drop rates at both the initial and 3 hr measurement (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05), most likely due to concentration differences between cellular constituents and the media environment. Conclusion: Differences seen continue to suggest that a simple test of buoyancy may allow the determination of embryo viability and development potential. Further study is needed with a much larger embryo population to confirm these observations.

References

[1]  HHS.gov (2024) Fact Sheet: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Use Across the United States.
[2]  Fatemi, H., Bilger, W., Denis, D., Griesinger, G., La Marca, A., Longobardi, S., et al. (2021) Dose Adjustment of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) during Ovarian Stimulation as Part of Medically-Assisted Reproduction in Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review Covering 10 Years (2007-2017). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 19, Article No. 68.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x
[3]  Rienzi, L., Vajta, G. and Ubaldi, F. (2011) New Culture Devices in ART. Placenta, 32, S248-S251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.018
[4]  Sciorio, R. and Rinaudo, P. (2023) Culture Conditions in the IVF Laboratory: State of the ART and Possible New Directions. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 40, 2591-2607.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02934-5
[5]  Tocariu, R., Niculae, L.E., Niculae, A.Ș., Carp-Velișcu, A. and Brătilă, E. (2024) Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization/intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes. Medicina, 60, Article 1373.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081373
[6]  Racowsky, C., Vernon, M., Mayer, J., Ball, G.D., Behr, B., Pomeroy, K.O., et al. (2010) Standardization of Grading Embryo Morphology. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27, 437-439.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9443-2
[7]  Greco, E., Litwicka, K., Minasi, M.G., Cursio, E., Greco, P.F. and Barillari, P. (2020) Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 4381.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124381
[8]  Chavez-Badiola, A., Farías, A.F., Mendizabal-Ruiz, G., Silvestri, G., Griffin, D.K., Valencia-Murillo, R., et al. (2024) Use of Artificial Intelligence Embryo Selection Based on Static Images to Predict First-Trimester Pregnancy Loss. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 49, Article 103934.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103934
[9]  Faramarzi, A., Khalili, M.A. and Omidi, M. (2017) Morphometric Analysis of Human Oocytes Using Time Lapse: Does It Predict Embryo Developmental Outcomes? Human Fertility, 22, 171-176.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1406670
[10]  Wessels, C, Penrose, L.L. and Prien, S.D. (2017) Current State of Art Embryo Selection Techniques. Investigations in Gynecology Research & Womens Health (IGRWH), 1, 7-12.
https://doi.org/10.31031/igrwh.2017.01.000502
[11]  Weathers, J., Zimmerer, N., Penrose, L., Graves-Evenson, K. and Prien, S. (2013) The Relationship between Maternal Body Fat and Pre-Implantation Embryonic Weight: Implications for Survival and Long-Term Development in an Assisted Reproductive Environment. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2013.35a2001
[12]  Sciorio, R., Miranian, D. and Smith, G.D. (2022) Non-Invasive Oocyte Quality Assessment. Biology of Reproduction, 106, 274-290.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac009
[13]  Kakourou, G., Mamas, T., Vrettou, C. and Traeger-Synodinos, J. (2022) An Update on Non-Invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo. Current Genomics, 23, 337-352.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202923666220927111158
[14]  Pandit, S. and Sharma, R. (2022) Non Invasive Assessment of Human Oocytes and Embryos in Assisted Reproduction: Review on Present Practices and Future Trends. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 78, 7-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.04.002
[15]  Weathers, J.D. and Prien, S.D. (2014) Estimation of Weight and Lipid Composition in Preimplantation Embryos from Jersey and Beef Breeds of Cattle. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 4, 261-266.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2014.411031
[16]  Prien, S.D., Wessels, C.E. and Penrose, L.L. (2015) Preliminary Trials of a Specific Gravity Technique in the Determination of Early Embryo Growth Potential. Human Reproduction, 30, 2076-2083.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev178
[17]  Wessels, C., Penrose, L., Ahmad, K. and Prien, S. (2017) Noninvasive Embryo Assessment Technique Based on Buoyancy and Its Association with Embryo Survival after Cryopreservation. Theriogenology, 103, 169-172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.010
[18]  Wells, C.W., Penrose, L.L., Orth, M. and Prien, S. (2020) A Noninvasive Method for Assessing Oocyte Competency. Case Reports in Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive, 2, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.31487/j.crogr.2020.02.02
[19]  Stachecki, J.J. and Cohen, J. (2008) S3 Vitrification System: A Novel Approach to Blastocyst Freezing. The Journal of Clinical Embryology, 11, 2-14.
[20]  Casper, R.F. (2023) PGT-A: Houston, We Have a Problem. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 40, 2325-2332.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02913-w
[21]  Du, R., Zhao, D., Kang, K., Wang, F., Xu, R., Chi, C., et al. (2022) A Review of Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing Technologies and Applications. Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, 7, 20-31.
https://doi.org/10.1097/rd9.0000000000000049

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133