To study the role and place of religion in human societies, we must first describe the latter. In Sociology Mind, “Structures of Human Societies” (van Meter, 2014), we have previously described Agoramétrie’s results on how human societies are distributed over a two dimensional structure around a first axis of “openness”/“closure” and a second axis of “emotional”/“non-emotional”. In the same article, we have also shown how early villages and cities were also distributed along the “openness”/“closure” axis ranging from cooperative “Type 1” villages without defensive walls, all the way to “Type 2” walled hierarchically organized closed cities. In the earliest examples of the cooperative villages, there is no archeological evidence of organized religion or its concomitant clergy, or any distinctive evidence of a community. In the earliest examples of hierarchically organized cities, there is such evidence. Here in this article, we examine the place of religion in this two dimensional structure and its close proximity and association with other institutions of society such as doctors, teachers, police, politicians and clergy, and their roles in managing conflict within society. In the specific case of clergy and religion, this implies a fundamental role of “closure” in the management of conflict both at the individual and the societal level. Other methods of analysis or scientific approaches have arrived at similar results and these methods and approaches are closely and fundamentally related.
References
[1]
Abric, J. C. (2006). Pratiques sociales et représentations. Presses universitaires de France.
[2]
Agoramétrie (1987). Les structures de l’opinion en 1985—Enquêtes et méthodologie. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 14, 94-97.
[3]
Agoramétrie (1998). Les structures de l’opinion fin 1997. Agoramétrie.
[4]
Agoramétrie (2005). Opinions et structures de l’opinion début 2004—Analyse du champ des controverses médiatiques et de sa dynamique. Agoramétrie.
[5]
Bandy, M. (2006). The Neolithic Demographic Transition and Its Consequences. Presentation during the Session “Early Village Society in Global Perspective” at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Juan.
[6]
Bourdieu, P. (1971). Genèse et structure du champ religieux. RevueFrançaisedeSociologie,12, 295-334. https://doi.org/10.2307/3320234
[7]
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies. CurrentAnthropology,60, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478
[8]
Dobewall, H., & Strack, M. (2014). Relationship of Inglehart’s and Schwartz’s Value Dimensions Revisited. InternationalJournalofPsychology,49, 240-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12004
[9]
Durand, J., Pages, J., Brenot, J., & Barny, M. (1990). Public Opinion and Conflicts: A Theory and System of Opinion Polls. InternationalJournalofPublicOpinionResearch,2, 30-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/2.1.30
[10]
Durkheim, E. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Le système totémique en Australie. Alcan.
[11]
Hammer, B. (2015). Énergie et transformations sociales. In Énergieettransformationssociales (pp. 183-200). Lavoisier. https://doi.org/10.3917/lav.cihue.2015.01.0183
[12]
Inglehart, R. F. (2008). Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006. WestEuropeanPolitics,31, 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701834747
[13]
Jaubert, J., Verheyden, S., Genty, D., Soulier, M., Cheng, H., Blamart, D. et al. (2016). Early Neanderthal Constructions Deep in Bruniquel Cave in Southwestern France. Nature,534, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18291
[14]
Larsen, C. S., Knüsel, C. J., Haddow, S. D., Pilloud, M. A., Milella, M., Sadvari, J. W. et al. (2019). Bioarchaeology of Neolithic Çatalhöyük Reveals Fundamental Transitions in Health, Mobility, and Lifestyle in Early Farmers. ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences,116, 12615-12623. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904345116
[15]
Pagès, J. P., & van Meter, K. M. (2023). Débat public—le jeu des valeurs et des symboles: L’approche Agoramétrie. L’Harmattan.
[16]
Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. Yale University Press.
[17]
Saroglou, V. (2002a). Religion and the Five Factors of Personality: A Meta-Analytic Review. PersonalityandIndividualDifferences,32, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00233-6
[18]
Saroglou, V. (2002b). Beyond Dogmatism: The Need for Closure as Related to Religion. MentalHealth,Religion&Culture,5, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670210144130
[19]
Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and Religiosity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Schwartz’s Model. PersonalityandIndividualDifferences,37, 721-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.005
[20]
Saroglou, V., Kempeneers, A., & Seynhaeve, I. (2003). Need for Closure and Adult Attachment Dimensions as Predictors of Religion and Reading Interests. In H. M. P. Roelofsma Peter, J. Corveleyn, & J. W. van Saane (Eds.), One Hundred Years of Psychology and Religion (pp. 139-154). VU University Press.
[21]
Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic Human Values: An Overview. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237364051_Basic_Human_Values_An_Overview
[22]
UNESCO (2025). Neolithic Site of Çatalhöyük. UNESCO World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1405/
[23]
Ur, J. A., Karsgaard, P., & Oates, J. (2007). Early Urban Development in the Near East. Science,317, Article 1188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138728
[24]
van Meter, K. M. (2001). The Structure of Public Opinion Concerning Social Conflicts as a Fractal Structure for Society. International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems,9, 143-158.
[25]
van Meter, K. M. (2004). How People See Society: The Network Structure of Public Opinion Concerning Social Conflicts. Connections, 26, 71-89.
[26]
van Meter, K. M. (2014). Structures of Human Societies. Sociology Mind, 4, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2014.41005
[27]
van Meter, K. M. (2017). Agoramétrie’s Trunk Questions & Moscovici Social Representation’s Core—More than Just Similarities. BulletinofSociologicalMethodology/BulletindeMéthodologieSociologique,136, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106317725655
[28]
Wach, M., & Hammer, B. (2003). La structure des valeurs est-elle universelle? Genèse et validation du modèle compréhensif de Schwartz. L’Harmattan.