全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Fabricating Pediatrics Bone Tissue Equivalent Materials for CT Quality Control Evaluation

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2025.143006, PP. 75-88

Keywords: Bone Equivalent Material, Calcium Carbonate CaCO3, Computed Tomography, Hounsfield Unit, Silicone Rubber RTV (683), Phantom, Pediatric

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Computed tomography (CT) imaging plays a critical role in diagnostic radiology, so they require pediatric or adult phantoms with high tissue equivalent material for accurate imaging, radiation dose optimization and radiation safety purposes and to assess and verify performance in CT quality control program. Yet the high cost of commercial alternatives limits their accessibility. The aim of this study was to fabricate skeletal bone equivalent materials useful in construction of pediatric phantom where low-cost bone equivalent materials were used. It provides a new composition and simple methodology for skeletal construction. The characteristics of developed bone equivalent material were evaluated by its physical density and Hounsfield unit (HU) of material. where Silicone rubber RTV (683) was used with CaCO3 to fabricate bone equivalent material, which involves weighing of 50 g of silicon rubber RTV (683), then mixed with 17 g of CaCo3 and 2 ml of the catalyst. This ratio was chosen based on prior research and the mixed quantity was improved after excessive experimental testing to fit the environmental condition and give better results. The production procedures have also been streamlined to create molds for each bone of the skeleton. Information regarding the new tissue‐equivalent materials, as well as images of the construction process and completed skeletal was done. The average density measurements of samples manufactured from silicone rubber RTV with CaCo3 fall within the range of human bone tissue concentration, which is (1.2 - 1.8) g/cm3, indicating that the density values are comparable to those of human bone. The attenuation coefficients (HU) value on various computed tomography images of bone-equivalent materials (silicone rubber RTV with CaCO3) also show findings that are within the range seen for human bone tissue. The human bone’s HU calibration standard falls between 400 and 1000 HU. Therefore, silicone rubber RTV (683) with CaCO3 can be used in construction of skeletal. This material can be applied to different diagnostic radiology quality applications and has produced great image quality. The majority of conventional phantoms used in quality control testing were constructed using CT slices, which may have made it difficult to see the skeletal vertebrae and all of their intricacies. Nonetheless, the suggested model provides a clear image of the spine’s vertebrae and every skeletal component, including all of its intricacies, which can aid in the computation

References

[1]  Hermena, S. and Young, M. (2022) CT-Scan Image Production Procedures. StatPearls.
[2]  US Drug & FOUD ADMINSTRATION (2023) Computed Tomography, Medical-X-Ray Imaging.
[3]  Varchena, V. (2002) Pediatric Phantoms. Pediatric Radiology, 32, 280-284.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0681-z
[4]  Orton, C.G. (1982) Progress in Medical Radiation Physics. Springer.
[5]  Stieve, F.E. (1989) Radiological Requirements for the Specification of Image Quality Criteria, In: Optimization of Image Quality and Patient Exposure in Diagnostic Radiology, BIR Report, 221-238.
[6]  Geraldelli, W., Tomal, A. and Poletti, M.E. (2013) Characterization of Tissue-Equivalent Materials through Measurements of the Linear Attenuation Coefficient and Scattering Profiles Obtained with Polyenergetic Beams. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 60, 566-571.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2013.2248382
[7]  Akhlaghi, P., Miri Hakimabad, H. and Rafat Motavalli, L. (2015) Determination of Tissue Equivalent Materials of a Physical 8-Year-Old Phantom for Use in Computed Tomography. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 112, 169-176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.030
[8]  IUPAC (1997) Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed.
[9]  Donald Frey, G. (2014) Basic CT Parameters. American Journal of Roentgenology, 203, W495-W497.
[10]  Mazurek, P., Vudayagiri, S. and Skov, A.L. (2019) How to Tailor Flexible Silicone Elastomers with Mechanical Integrity: A Tutorial Review. Chemical Society Reviews, 48, 1448-1464.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00963e
[11]  Das, I., Cheng, C., Cao, M. and Johnstone, P.S. (2016) Computed Tomography Imaging Parameters for Inhomogeneity Correction in Radiation Treatment Planning. Journal of Medical Physics, 41, 3-11.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.177277
[12]  Strumińska-Parulska, D.I. (2015) Determination of 210 Po in Calcium Supplements and the Possible Related Dose Assessment to the Consumers. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 150, 121-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.08.006
[13]  Al Omari, M.M.H., Rashid, I.S., Qinna, N.A., Jaber, A.M. and Badwan, A.A. (2016) Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology. Elsevier.
[14]  Sprawls, P. (1993) Physical Principles of Medical Imaging. Medical Physics Pub Corp.
[15]  Romans, L.E. (2011) Computed Tomography for Technologists: A Comprehensive Text. Wollters Kluwer Health.
[16]  Lloyd-Jones, G. (2016, March). Basics of X-Ray: Tissue Densities [Lecture Notes]. Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust.
[17]  Hartung, M.P. and Brown, A. (2024) Abdominal CT: Attenuation.
https://litfl.com/abdominal-ct-attenuation
[18]  Prokop, M. (2003) Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the Body. Thieme.
[19]  Hounsfield, G.N. (1980) Computed Medical Imaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 4, 665-674.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198010000-00017
[20]  Winslow, J.F., Hyer, D.E., Fisher, R.F., Tien, C.J. and Hintenlang, D.E. (2009) Construction of Anthropomorphic Phantoms for Use in Dosimetry Studies. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 10, 195-204.
https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2986
[21]  Mohammed Ali, A., Hogg, P., Johansen, S. and England, A. (2018) Construction and Validation of a Low Cost Paediatric Pelvis Phantom. European Journal of Radiology, 108, 84-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.015
[22]  Glide‐Hurst, C., Chen, D., Zhong, H. and Chetty, I.J. (2013) Changes Realized from Extended Bit‐depth and Metal Artifact Reduction in Ct. Medical Physics, 40, Article ID: 061711.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4805102
[23]  Abu Arrah, A.R.M., Faisal, A. and Ratna Sari, D.C. (2018) An Easily Made, Low-Cost, Bone Equivalent Material Used in Phantom Construction of Computed Tomography. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13, 7604-7609.
[24]  ICRU (1989) Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 44.
[25]  ACR (2013) CT Accreditation Phantom Instructions. American College of Radiology, 1-14.
[26]  Claude, K.P., Tagoe, S.N.A., Schandorf, C. and Amuasi, J.H. (2013) Fabrication of a Tissue Characterization Phantom from Indigenous Materials for Computed Tomography Electron Density Calibration. The South African Radiographer, 51, 9-17.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133