|
|
父母权威合法性问卷中文修订及其信效度检验
|
Abstract:
目的：修订父母权威合法性问卷(Legitimacy of Parental Authority Scale, LPAS)，检验其在中国青少年中的信效度。方法：对1154名青少年施测中文版LPAS，随后进行项目分析、相关分析、探索性和验证性因素分析、内部一致性分析。并在3个月后对其中525名被试实施重测，进行重测信度分析。选取父母情感温暖、亲子关系亲密度和行为自主决策作为效标工具，进行效标效度分析。结果：探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均支持中文版LPAS的双因素模型；问卷总分与父母情感温暖、亲子关系亲密度呈显著正相关，与行为自主决策呈显著负相关；问卷的内部一致性系数为0.734，分半信度为0.713，三个月后的重测信度为0.705。结论：中文版LPAS具有良好的信效度和测量等值性，可以作为测量中国青少年父母权威合法性的有效工具。
Objective: To revise the Legitimacy of Parental Authority Scale (LPAS) and examine its reliability and validity among Chinese adolescents. Methods: A total of 1154 adolescents were administered the Chinese version of LPAS. Subsequently, item analysis, Relevant analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency analysis were conducted. After three months, 525 participants were retested to assess the test-retest reliability. Parental emotional warmth, parent-child relationship closeness, and behavioral autonomy decision-making were selected as criterion measures for criterion validity analysis. Results: Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the two-factor model of the Chinese version of LPAS. The total score of the questionnaire was significantly positively correlated with parental emotional warmth and parent-child relationship closeness, and significantly negatively correlated with behavioral autonomy decision-making. The internal consistency coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.734, the split-half reliability was 0.713, and the test-retest reliability after three months was 0.705. Conclusion: The Chinese version of LPAS has good reliability and validity and measurement invariance, and can be used as an effective tool for measuring the legitimacy of parental authority among Chinese adolescents.
| [1] | 柴唤友, 孙晓军, 牛更枫, 等(2016). 亲子关系、友谊质量对主观幸福感的影响: 间接效应模型及性别差异. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(3), 531-534. |
| [2] | 范兴华, 范志宇(2020). 亲子关系与农村留守儿童幸福感: 心理资本的中介与零花钱的调节. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(3), 624-627. |
| [3] | 王美芳, 牛骅, 赵晓(2018). 儿童版父母教养方式问卷的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(1), 6-11. |
| [4] | 张锦涛, 刘勤学, 邓林园, 等(2011). 青少年亲子关系与网络成瘾: 孤独感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 641-647. |
| [5] | Baumrind, D. (1967). Child Care Practices Anteceding Three Patterns of Preschool Behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43-88, |
| [6] | Baumrind, D. (1971). Current Patterns of Parental Authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372 |
| [7] | Baumrind, D. (1991). The Influence of Parenting Style on Adolescent Competence and Substance Use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431691111004 |
| [8] | Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Caught between Parents: Adolescents’ Experience in Divorced Homes. Child Development, 62, 1008-1029. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131149 |
| [9] | Buri, J. R. (1991). Parental Authority Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_13 |
| [10] | Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martínez, M. L. (2007). Adolescents as Active Agents in the Socialization Process: Legitimacy of Parental Authority and Obligation to Obey as Predictors of Obedience. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.003 |
| [11] | Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Peña-Alampay, L. (2005). Rules, Legitimacy of Parental Authority, and Obligation to Obey in Chile, the Philippines, and the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.127 |
| [12] | Milnitsky-Sapiro, C., Turiel, E., & Nucci, L. (2006). Brazilian Adolescents’ Conceptions of Autonomy and Parental Authority. Cognitive Development, 21, 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.01.001 |
| [13] | Qin, L., Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). Are Gains in Decision‐Making Autonomy during Early Adolescence Beneficial for Emotional Functioning? the Case of the United States and China. Child Development, 80, 1705-1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01363.x |
| [14] | Reitman, D., Rhode, P. C., Hupp, S. D. A., & Altobello, C. (2002). Development and Validation of the Parental Authority Questionnaire-Revised. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015344909518 |
| [15] | Smetana, J. G. (2002). Culture, Autonomy, and Personal Jurisdiction in Adolescent-Parent Relationships. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 51-87). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80051-9 |
| [16] | Smetana, J. G., & Daddis, C. (2002). Domain-Specific Antecedents of Parental Psychological Control and Monitoring: The Role of Parenting Beliefs and Practices. Child Development, 73, 563-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00424 |
| [17] | Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 |
| [18] | Tisak, M. S. (1986). Children’s Conceptions of Parental Authority. Child Development, 57, 166-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130648 |
| [19] | Trinkner, R., Cohn, E. S., Rebellon, C. J., & Van Gundy, K. (2012). Don’t Trust Anyone over 30: Parental Legitimacy as a Mediator between Parenting Style and Changes in Delinquent Behavior over Time. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.003 |
| [20] | Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation. In S. T. Fiske, A. E. Kazdin, & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology Vol. 57 (pp. 375-400). Annual Reviews. |
| [21] | Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Why People Obey the Law (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. |
