全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Unveiling Latent Dispute Causes in Construction: A Social Network Perspective

DOI: 10.4236/ojce.2025.152012, PP. 205-222

Keywords: Contract Administration, Construction Disputes, Information Asymmetry, Social Network Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Construction disputes often arise not from isolated incidents but from interconnected latent causes, underlying systemic issues that remain hidden until activated by project dynamics. This study explores these latent dispute causes within the Kenyan construction industry using Social Network Analysis (SNA). A dataset of 30 documented dispute cases was analyzed, supported by expert validation, to identify 14 latent causes such as inequitable contractual practices, ambiguous contract terms, conflicts of interest, and incomplete designs. The analysis was conducted using the University of California Network (UCINET) software, which enabled the generation of adjacency matrices and calculation of centrality measures to map the interdependencies and influence among dispute causes. Results indicate that disputes often stem from power asymmetries, unclear scopes, and overlapping roles, particularly prevalent in Design-Bid-Build procurement systems where a single agent handles design, supervision, and certification. Centrality scores revealed inequitable practices and contract ambiguities as the most influential latent factors. The study highlights the inadequacy of traditional linear models in capturing these non-linear and weighted relationships. Key recommendations include clear role segregation, adaptive risk management, transparent contract structuring, and integration of predictive analytics like SNA. This research provides a robust, system-level framework for proactively identifying and mitigating latent dispute risks in construction.

References

[1]  Abdul-Malak, M.U., Bou Hamdan, S. and Demachkieh, F.S. (2020) Enhanced Roles and Traits of the Engineer in Assessing Claims. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12, Article 04520019.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000398
[2]  Abdul Nabi, M., Assaad, R.H. and El-Adaway, I.H. (2024) Modeling and Understanding Dispute Causation in the US Public-Private Partnership Projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 30, Article 04023035.
https://doi.org/10.1061/jitse4.iseng-2328
[3]  Abotaleb, I.S. and El-adaway, I.H. (2017) Administering Employers’ Payment Obligations under National and International Design-Build Standard Forms of Contract. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9, Article 04517003.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000213
[4]  Aljassmi, H., Han, S. and Davis, S. (2014) Project Pathogens Network: New Approach to Analyzing Construction-Defects-Generation Mechanisms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140, Article 04013028.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000774
[5]  Alvarenga, T.W., Da Silva, E.N. and De Brito Mello, L.C.B. (2017) BIM and Lean Construction: The Evolution Obstacle in the Brazilian Civil Construction Industry. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 7, 1904-1908.
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1278
[6]  Ansari, R., Khalilzadeh, M., Taherkhani, R., Antucheviciene, J., Migilinskas, D. and Moradi, S. (2022) Performance Prediction of Construction Projects Based on the Causes of Claims: A System Dynamics Approach. Sustainability, 14, Article 4138.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074138
[7]  Assaf, S., Hassanain, M.A., Abdallah, A., Sayed, A.M.Z. and Alshahrani, A. (2019) Significant Causes of Claims and Disputes in Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9, 597-615.
https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-09-2018-0113
[8]  Barman, A. and Charoenngam, C. (2017) Decisional Uncertainties in Construction Projects as a Cause of Disputes and Their Formal Legal Interpretation by the Courts: Review of Legal Cases in the United Kingdom. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9, Article 04517011.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000222
[9]  Budumuru, S., Allu, G., Jenjeti, D., Tanakala, V.S.A. and Sankranti, S.R. (2024) Design of a Funnel-Shaped MIMO Antenna for RADAR Applications. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14, 16808-16812.
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8177
[10]  Chang, C. and Ive, G. (2007) The Hold-up Problem in the Management of Construction Projects: A Case Study of the Channel Tunnel. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 394-404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.001
[11]  Chan, E.E., Nik-Bakht, M. and Han, S.H. (2021) Sources of Ambiguity in Construction Contract Documents, Reflected by Litigation in Supreme Court Cases. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13, Article 04521031.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000498
[12]  Cheung, S.O. and Pang, H.Y. (2014) Conceptualising Construction Disputes. In: Cheung, S., Ed., Construction Dispute Research: Conceptualisation, Avoidance and Resolution, Springer, 19-37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04429-3
[13]  Cheung, S.O. and Pang, K.H.Y. (2013) Anatomy of Construction Disputes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139, 15-23.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000532
[14]  Cinko, E.G., Demirkesen, S., Sadikoglu, E. and Zhang, C. (2023) Investigating the Critical Success Factors of Claims Management in Construction Contracts. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15, Article 04522066.
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-921
[15]  Elazhary, M., Shiha, A., El-adaway, I.H. and Young, S. (2024) Quantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40, Article 04024031.
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6072
[16]  Ghosh, S.K., Seikh, M.R. and Chakrabortty, M. (2024) Coordination and Strategic Decision Making in a Stochastic Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Customers’ Channel Preferences. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 15, 2248-2270.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02240-4
[17]  Gurgun, A.P. and Koc, K. (2022) The Role of Contract Incompleteness Factors in Project Disputes: A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30, 3895-3926.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2021-1020
[18]  Han, M., Hogan, S.O., Holmboe, E., Jing, Y., Yamazaki, K. and Trock, B.J. (2022) Trends in Industry Payments to Physicians in the First 6 Years after Graduate Medical Training. JAMA Network Open, 5, e2237574.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37574
[19]  Hsu, P., Aurisicchio, M., Angeloudis, P. and Whyte, J. (2020) Understanding and Visualizing Schedule Deviations in Construction Projects Using Fault Tree Analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27, 2501-2522.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-01-2020-0058
[20]  Kenyatta, M.O., Gwaya, A.O., Masu, S.M. and Ajwang, P. (2022) Identifying and Analyzing Effects of Interdependencies on Construction Contractor Payment Risks. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 6, 107-136.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636221136469
[21]  Kenyatta, M.O., Gwaya, A.O., Munguti Masu, S. and Ajwang, P. (2022) Examining Dissimilar Interactions Enabling Late Payments, Underpayments and Non-Payments to Construction Contractors. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 6, 37-58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636221086545
[22]  Kenyatta, M.O. (2024) Development of an Interdependency Network Model for Analyzing Construction Contractor Payment Risks in Kenya: A Case of de-Sign-Bid-Build Procurement System. PhD Thesis, Jkuat-Coetec.
[23]  Khalef, R. and El-adaway, I.H. (2024) Investigating Causes of Disputes Resulting in Litigation in Airport Development Projects in the United States Using Graph-Based Techniques. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40, Article 04024015.
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5903
[24]  Kumaraswamy, M.M. (2024) Conflicts, Claims and Disputes. In: Kumaraswamy, M., Ed., Routledge Handbook of Construction Project Procurement and Delivery, Routledge, 164-183.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003351269-13
[25]  Kumar Viswanathan, S., Panwar, A., Kar, S., Lavingiya, R. and Jha, K.N. (2020) Causal Modeling of Disputes in Construction Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12, Article 04520035.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000432
[26]  Lee, C., Chong, H., Liao, P. and Wang, X. (2018) Critical Review of Social Network Analysis Applications in Complex Project Management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34, Article 04017061.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000579
[27]  Love, P.E.D., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D.D. and Irani, Z. (2016) Cost Overruns in Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Sowing the Seeds for a Probabilistic Theory of Causation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 184-194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.007
[28]  Love, P.E.D., Davis, P.R., Ellis, J.M. and Cheung, S.O. (2010) A Systemic View of Dispute Causation. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3, 661-680.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011076109
[29]  Love, P., Davis, P., Ellis, J. and On Cheung, S. (2010) Dispute Causation: Identification of Pathogenic Influences in Construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17, 404-423.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011056592
[30]  Padroth, C., Davis, P.R. and Morrissey, M. (2017) Contract Information Asymmetry: Legal Disconnect within the Project Team. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9, Article 04517015.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000231
[31]  Schenck, IV, J.S. and Goss, K.E. (2015) Liability for Construction Defects that Result from Multiple Causes. Journal of the American College of Construction Lawyers, 9, 45-49.
[32]  Shojaat, M., Malekitabar, H. and Haghayegh Isfahani, H. (2025) Navigating the Complexity of Dispute Management in Construction: A DEMATEL and Bayesian Network Approach. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17, Article 04524029.
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1143
[33]  Tabish, S.Z.S. and Jha, K.N. (2023) Dispute Avoidance in Public Construction Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15, Article 04522033.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000577
[34]  Walsh, K.P. (2017) Identifying and Mitigating the Risks Created by Problematic Clauses in Construction Contracts. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9, Article 03717001.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000225
[35]  Wang, J., Ding, Z., Zou, L., and Zuo, J. (2013) Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer Science & Business Media.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35548-6
[36]  Wang, P., Zhang, L., Wang, K. and Fenn, P. (2021) Aetiology and Progression of Construction Disputes Towards a Predictive Model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25, 1131-1143.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0728-z
[37]  Winanri, R.P., Susanti, B. and Juliantina, I. (2019) Comparison Analysis between Traditional and Long Segment Contracts on National Road Preservation Activities in Indonesia. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 9, 4230-4234.
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2720
[38]  Xu, X., Xiao, B. and Li, C.Z. (2021) Stakeholders’ Power over the Impact Issues of Building Energy Performance Gap: A Two-Mode Social Network Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, Article 125623.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125623
[39]  Wang, W., Harsono, I., Shieh, C., Samusenkov, V. and Shoar, S. (2022) Identification of Critical Paths Leading to Cost Claims for Underground Metro Projects: A System Dynamics Approach. Kybernetes, 52, 1861-1878.
https://doi.org/10.1108/k-09-2021-0786

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133