全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

学术话语中的转述潜势生成机制研究
The Generative Mechanism of Reporting Potential in Academic Discourse

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.136643, PP. 665-680

Keywords: 转述潜势,学科认识论,构式语法,系统功能语言学
Reporting Potential
, Disciplinary Epistemology, Construction Grammar, Systemic Functional Linguistics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

转述结构作为学术话语多声性的核心载体,其生成机制和功能意义尚未在不同学科中得到合理解释。本文基于系统功能语言学与构式语法,构建跨学科学术语篇语料库,提出“学术增强型语义–语用词嵌入模型(Academic Enhanced Semantic-Pragmatic Embedding)”,量化分析转述动词的学科特异性语义分布规律;并提出指数衰减模型(Exponential Decay Model),揭示了不同转述动词的语义相似度衰减速率。研究发现:1) 学科认识论驱动转述结构的句法分化,人文社会科学倾向使用“主体–行为–内容”构式,使用逻辑连接词以强化立场协商,自然科学倾向使用“现象–结论”构式,依赖名词化与简化主谓宾结构;2) 转述潜势(Reporting Potential)是不同学科中句法规则与语法资源的概率化生成系统,它通过及物性过程反映知识表征功能。本研究为学术写作规范与跨学科话语分析提供了理论框架与实证依据。
As a core carrier of heteroglossia in academic discourse, the generative mechanisms and functional significance of reporting structures remain underexplored across disciplinary contexts. This study develops a cross-disciplinary academic discourse corpus through the integration of Systemic Functional Linguistics and Construction Grammar. We propose an Academic-Enhanced Semantic-Pragmatic Embedding model to quantify disciplinary-specific semantic distribution patterns of reporting verbs, complemented by an Exponential Decay Model that reveals semantic similarity attenuation rates across verb categories. Key findings demonstrate: 1) Disciplinary epistemologies drive syntactic differentiation of reporting structures, humanities and social sciences favor agent-process-content constructions with logical connectives for stance negotiation, while natural sciences prefer phenomenon-conclusion patterns through nominalization and simplified SVO structures; 2) Reporting potential constitutes a probabilistic generative system of syntactic conventions and grammatical resources, operationalized through transitivity processes to fulfill knowledge representation functions. This research establishes a theoretical framework and empirical foundation for academic writing standardization and interdisciplinary discourse analysis.

References

[1]  Bazerman, C., et al. (2005) Reference Guide to Writing across the Curriculum. Palor Press.
[2]  Hyland, K. (1999) Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20, 341-367.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
[3]  桂诗春, 冯志伟. 杨惠中, 等. 语料库语言学与中国外语教学[J]. 现代外语, 2010, 33(4): 419-426.
[4]  Chang, Y.Y. and Swales, J.M. (1999) Informal Elements in English Academic Writing: Threats or Opportunities for Advanced Non-Native Speakers. In: Candlin, C.N. and Hyland, K., Eds., Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, Longman, 145-167.
[5]  唐玮, 林正军. 学术英语写作中引语研究的现状与展望[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2022(2): 94-101.
[6]  Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
[7]  杨拓. 学术语篇中作者立场表达研究[J]. 黑龙江教育(理论与实践), 2016(3): 17-18.
[8]  张英, 雷蕾. 学术语篇中“名词 + 补足语”结构立场表达——基于语料库的跨学科研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2018, 41(1): 39-47+159-160.
[9]  李玖, 王建华. 学术写作中的立场表达研究范式述评[J]. 外语教育, 2019(00): 105-114.
[10]  Charles, M. (2006) Phraseological Patterns in Reporting Clauses Used in Citation: A Corpus-Based Study of Theses in Two Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 310-331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
[11]  任明珍. 中外英语语言学类期刊中转述动词对比研究[J]. 考试与评价(大学英语教研版), 2017(4): 115-119.
[12]  刘永厚, 司显柱. 中外学者学术评价能力对比研究——以国际发表中的英语转述动词为例[J]. 中国外语, 2022, 19(2): 69-77.
[13]  Boyack, K.W., van Eck, N.J., Colavizza, G. and Waltman, L. (2018) Characterizing in-Text Citations in Scientific Articles: A Large-Scale Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 59-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.005
[14]  Casal, J.E. and Lee, J.J. (2019) Syntactic Complexity and Writing Quality in Assessed First-Year L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 51-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005
[15]  刘锐, 黄启庆, 王珊. 汉语学术语篇转述标记的形式、功能与分布[J]. 当代修辞学, 2021(6): 60-72.
[16]  Biber, D. (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519871
[17]  Biber, D. (2014) Using Multi-Dimensional Analysis to Explore Cross-Linguistic Universals of Register Variation. Languages in Contrast, 14, 7-34.
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib
[18]  Hood, S. (2010) Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. Springer.
[19]  Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd Edition, Hodder Arnold.
[20]  Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2014) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge.
[21]  Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2013) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
[22]  杨炳钧, 覃朝宪. 系统功能语言学中的元功能思想[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2001(1): 47-56.
[23]  Martin, J.R. and White, P.R. (2005) Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
[24]  Martin, J.R. and White, P.R. (2003) The Language of Evaluation (Vol. 2). Palgrave Macmillan.
[25]  Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023) Persuasion in Multimodal Digital Genres: Building Credibility in Video Abstracts. ESP Today, 11, 213-236.
https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2023.11.2.2
[26]  梁红艳, 曾蕾. 功能语言学视阈下的投射语言翻译研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 32(4): 12-16+22.
[27]  邓泳笙. 多维度融合的引文推荐算法[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019.
[28]  Kitaev, N. and Klein, D. (2018) Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encoder. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Long Papers), Melbourne, 15-20 July 2018, 2676-2686.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p18-1249
[29]  Marín-Arrese, J.I. (2021) Stance, Emotion and Persuasion: Terrorism and the Press. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 135-148.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.022
[30]  刘旭. 基于Python自然语言处理工具包在语料库研究中的运用[J]. 昆明冶金高等专科学校学报, 2015, 31(5): 65-69+93.
[31]  Levy, O. and Goldberg, Y. (2014) Dependency-Based Word Embeddings. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Short Papers), Baltimore, 23-25 June 2014, 302-308.
https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p14-2050
[32]  Levy, O. and Goldberg, Y. (2014) Linguistic Regularities in Sparse and Explicit Word Representations. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Ann Arbor, 26-27 June 2014, 171-180.
https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-1618
[33]  Levy, O. and Goldberg, Y. (2014) Neural Word Embedding as Implicit Matrix Factorization. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, 8-13 December 2014, 2177-2185.
[34]  Zhang, Y., Cheng, H., Shen, Z., Liu, X., Wang, Y. and Gao, J. (2023) Pre-Training Multi-Task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific Literature Understanding. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Singapore, 6-10 December 2023, 12259-12275.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.820
[35]  Anthony, L. and Lashkia, G.V. (2003) Mover: A Machine Learning Tool to Assist in the Reading and Writing of Technical Papers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46, 185-193.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2003.816789
[36]  饶元, 吴连伟, 王一鸣, 等. 基于语义分析的情感计算技术研究进展[J]. 软件学报, 2018, 29(8): 2397-2426.
[37]  Jurafsky, D. (2000) Speech and Language Processing. Prentice Hall.
[38]  Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
[39]  Goldberg, A.E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. OUP.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
[40]  Huth, J., Brogan, M., Dancik, B., et al. (1994) Scientific Format and Style: The CBE Manual for Authors, Editors. Cambridge University Press.
[41]  熊淑慧. 研究生新手写作者与专家的文献综述写作对比研究[J]. 上海理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 43(3): 228-235.
[42]  于晖, 宋金戈, 王乐. 大语言模型辅助的功能语篇分析: 理论、方法与实践[J]. 外语电化教学, 2024(5): 43-51+111.
[43]  Huang, Y., Bu, Y., Ding, Y. and Lu, W. (2020) Exploring Direct Citations between Citing Publications. Journal of Information Science, 47, 615-626.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520917654
[44]  Maton, K. and Doran, Y.J. (2017) Semantic Density: A Translation Device for Revealing Complexity of Knowledge Practices in Discourse, Part 1-Wording. Onomázein Revista de lingüíStica, Filología y Traducción, 46-76.
[45]  Liu, Q. (2022) Text Complexity Analysis of Chinese and Foreign Academic English Writing via Mobile Devices Based on Neural Network and Deep Learning. Library Hi Tech, 41, 1317-1332.
https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-11-2021-0383
[46]  Shen, C., Guo, J., Shi, P., Qu, S. and Tian, J. (2023) A Corpus-Based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity in Academic Writing of L1 and L2 English Students across Years and Disciplines. PLOS ONE, 18, e0292688.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292688
[47]  Uba, S.Y. (2019) Semantic Categories of Reporting Verbs across Four Disciplines in Research Articles. English Language Teaching, 13, 89-98.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n1p89
[48]  Yang, L. (2013) Evaluative Functions of Reporting Evidentials in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 119-126.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2013.32016
[49]  Flowerdew, L. and Petrić, B. (2024) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation: How Corpus Linguistics Can Inform Academic Writing Pedagogy. English for Specific Purposes.
[50]  Varttala, T. (2002) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles: A Cross-Disciplinary Study. Domain-Specific English: Textual Practices Across Communities and Classrooms, Peter Lang, 141-174.
[51]  Martin, J.R. (1992) English Text. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59
[52]  Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. University of Toronto Press, 181-198.
[53]  Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D. and Zou, J. (2018) Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E3635-E3644.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720347115
[54]  Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., et al. (2013) Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 26, 3111-3119.
[55]  吴侠, 邵斌, 王贵. 构式化视角下英语临界复杂介词的固化研究[J]. 现代外语, 2024, 47(3): 316-330.
[56]  Michaelis, L.A. and Lambrecht, K. (1996) Toward a Construction-Based Theory of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition. Language, 72, 215-247.
https://doi.org/10.2307/416650
[57]  Booij, G. (2009) Compounding and Construction Morphology. In: Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P., Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Oxford University Press, 201-216.
[58]  Joos, M. (1950) Description of Language Design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 701-707.
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906674
[59]  冯志伟. 计算语言学方法研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2023: 701.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133