Quantum Chromodynamic hadron models are lattice-QCD simulations with flux tubes terminating on quarks; Quantum Gravitodynamics hadron models use flux tube-based parton distributions. QCD is based on color-charge electric analogy; QGD uses mass-based gravitomagnetic analogy. This paper describes the physics and math underlying the model, attempts to determine if the model is stable, presents preliminary simulation results, and discusses limitations and planned extensions.
References
[1]
Cea, P., Cosmai, L., Cuteri, F. and Papa, A. (2017) Flux Tubes in the QCD Vacuum. Physical Review D, 95, Article 114511. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.95.114511
[2]
Klingman, E.E. (2025) The Origin of the Strong Force in Quantum Gravity. Journal of Modern Physics, 16, 198-227. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2025.161009
[3]
Klingman, E. (2024) Calabi-Yau Topology of Primordial Fermions. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 132-158.
[4]
Smith, J. (2018) Rotational Energy as Mass in . Physical Review Letters, 120, Article 143002.
[5]
Hestenes, D. and Sobczyk, G. (1984) Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus. Reidel Publication.
[6]
Heaviside, O. (1893) A Gravitational and Electromagnetic Analogy. The Electrician, 31, 81-88.
[7]
Will, C.M. (2018) New General Relativistic Contribution to Mercury’s Perihelion Advance. Physical Review Letters, 120, Article 191101. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.120.191101
[8]
Klingman, E.E. (2021) Encoding Energy-Density as Geometry. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 1190-1209. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.129073
