The doctrine of assumption of risk—the notion that one cannot blame others for damage, that is, the realization of risk to which one has willingly exposed oneself—was first codified in the Civil Code of the PRC in 2021. Judicial practice has interpreted and applied this in a variety of ways. The maxim “volenti non fit injuri” finds deep roots in our extralegal life and in Roman law. After its first application in the case of Cruden v. Fentham more than 200 years ago, this doctrine has experienced a dramatic and controversial evolution due to its straightforward literal meaning and revolutionary effect on society. I review the evolution of liberalism, one of the most important philosophical foundations of the doctrine of assumption of risk, and provide an in-depth analysis of the social and historical conditions, content, and impact on the assumption of risk of the three phases of liberalism, from laissez-faire liberalism to paternalistic liberalism to liberal egalitarianism. I conclude that in a risk society, the doctrine of assumption of risk is not only necessary but also provides an illuminating framework for the apportionment of liability in more areas of torts.
References
[1]
Bahr, C., Clive, E., Nölke, H., Beale, H., Herre, J., Huet, J., Schlechtriem, P., Storme, M., Swann, S., Varul, P., Veneziano, A., & Zoll, F. (2008). Principles, Definitions and Model Rules ofEuropean Private Law:Draft Common Frameof Reference. Sellier. European Law Publisher. https://archive.org/details/principlesdefini0000unse/page/n3/mode/2up
[2]
Blake, W. (1906). The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. John W. Luce and Co. https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/marriageofheaven00blak/marriageofheaven00blak.pdf
[3]
Bohlen, F. H. (1906). Voluntary Assumption of Risk. I. HarvardLawReview,20, 14-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1322882
[4]
Damico, A. J. (1997). What’s Wrong with Liberal Perfectionism? Polity,29, 397-420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235313
[5]
Dewsnup, R. (1991). In Defense of American Tort Law. The Clark Memorandum, 10, 24-31. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=clarkmemorandum#page=26
[6]
Dorfman, A. (2014). Assumption of Risk, after All. TheoreticalInquiriesinLaw,15, 293-328. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2014-0203
[7]
Dworkin, R. (1981). What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy&PublicAffairs,10, 283-345. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265047
[8]
Giesler, S. (1995). The Uncertain Future of Assumption of Risk in California. LoyolaofLosAngelesLawReview,28, 1494-1528. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1920&context=llr
[9]
Heuston, R. F. V. (1977). Salmondonthe Law of Torts (17th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. https://archive.org/details/salmondonlawofto0000heus/page/n7/mode/2up
[10]
James, F. (1952). Assumption of Risk. TheYaleLawJournal,61, 141-169. https://doi.org/10.2307/793676
[11]
James, F. (1968). Assumption of Risk: Unhappy Reincarnation. TheYaleLawJournal,78, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.2307/795061
[12]
Keeton, P., & Prosser, W. (1984). ProsserandKeetononthe Law of Torts (5th ed.). West Publishing Co. https://archive.org/details/prosserkeetononl00keet/page/n9/mode/2up
[13]
Mill, J. (1996). On Liberty (Cheng Chonghua, Trans.). Commercial Press. (Original Work Published 1859)
[14]
North, J. P. (1984). Employees’ Assumption of Risk: Real or Illusory Choice. TennesseeLawReview,52, 35-66.
[15]
Owen, D. (1997). Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law. Oxford University Press, Inc.
[16]
Pound, R. (1921). The Spirit ofthe Common Law. Marshall Jones Company. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.170920/page/n3/mode/2up
[17]
Prosser, W. (1971). Lawof Torts (4th ed.). West Publishing Co. https://archive.org/details/handbookoflawoft00pros/page/n11/mode/2up
[18]
Rawls, J. (2001). JusticeasFairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
[19]
Robertson, H. (1959). Aspectsofthe Rise of Economic Individualism:A Criticism ofMaxWeberand His School. Kelley & Millman, Inc. https://archive.org/details/aspectsofriseofe00robe/page/n7/mode/2up
[20]
Schwartz, B. (1990). The Law inAmerica:A History (Wang Jun, Trans.). China University of Political Science and Law Press. (Original Work Published 1974)
[21]
Shearman, T., & Redfield, A. (1870). A Treatise onthe Law of Negligence (2nd ed.). Baker, Voorhis & Co. https://archive.org/details/cu31924019317431/mode/2up
[22]
Smith, A. (2007). The Wealth of Nations.FromMetaLibrDigitalLibrary. https://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf
[23]
Stein, P., & Shand, J. (2004). Legal Values in Western Society (Wang Xianping, Trans.). China Legal Press. (Original Work Published 1974)
[24]
Thompson, S. (1880). The Law of Negligence in Relations Not Restingin Contract. F.H. Thomas and Company. https://archive.org/details/cu31924019316151/page/n5/mode/2up
[25]
Wang, C. C. (2009). The Rule of Self-Risk: Death or Regeneration? ComparativeLawStudies,5, 16-30.
[26]
Warren, C. (1895). “Volenti Non Fit Injuria” in Actions of Negligence. HarvardLawReview,8, 458-459. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321649
[27]
Watson, A. (1981). The Making ofthe Civil Law. Harvard University Press.
[28]
Wharton, F. (1874). A Treatise onthe Law of Negligence. Kay and Brother. https://archive.org/details/cu31924019316151/page/n5/mode/2up
[29]
White, E. (1985). Tort Law inAmerica:An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press, Inc. https://archive.org/details/tortlawinamerica00whit/page/n3/mode/2up
[30]
Yi, J. (2006). Individualistic Methodology and Private Law. LegalStudies,1, 89-103.
