Technology is an integral part of modern transit systems, and this is especially critical in rural areas where “transportation and connectivity are vital for rural development” (Kamalesh et al., 2023). However, rural transit users often face significant challenges in accessing public transportation due to limited connectivity and infrastructure. Many technologies used in large transit systems, which rely heavily on digital infrastructure and robust internet connectivity, are less effective in these rural areas. In Michigan, 57 rural public transit agencies provide an estimated 5.6 million trips annually, covering 37,000 square miles. These agencies vary in size and capacity, but on average, each agency provides 93,184 annual trips with a fleet of 20 vehicles and a staff of 28, serving an area of 620 square miles. A survey conducted by HNTB in 2022 classified the technology readiness of these rural agencies into four levels, ranging from novice to expert. In the spring of 2024, another survey was conducted at the Michigan Public Transit Association (MPTA) annual conference to reassess technology readiness, identify technological barriers, and evaluate the potential benefits of introducing advanced transit technologies in these rural settings. This study examines the current state of Michigan’s rural transit systems in 2024, drawing on surveys from the Michigan Public Transit Association (MPTA) annual conference and prior research by HNTB (2022). Key focus areas include: 1) Advancements in technology readiness for the agencies compared to past experiences. 2) Rider demographics and trip purposes. 3) Funding mechanisms and expenses of the systems. 4) Voter support through millage approvals in recent elections. Based on the findings, a set of recommendations is made on leveraging strategic communication, technology adaptation, and understanding user needs. The goal is to develop a framework for rural transit systems to improve service levels in terms of user-centered design to enhance accessibility, efficiency, and satisfaction via advanced technologies and a statewide Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) platform.
References
[1]
Berg, J., & Ihlström, J. (2019). The Importance of Public Transport for Mobility and Everyday Activities among Rural Residents. Social Sciences, 8, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020058
[2]
Detroit Transit (2024). Election Wins. https://www.detroittransit.org/election-wins/
[3]
Godavarthy, R., Mattson, J., & Ndembe, E. (2014). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Rural and Small Urban Transit. https://www.cutr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CUTR-Webcast-Handout-3.20.14.pdf
[4]
HNTB (2022). MDOT OPT Statewide Technology Plan for Michigan Rural Public Transit Agencies. https://www.michigan.gov/mdot/-/media/Project/Websites/MDOT/Travel/Mobility/Public-Transportation/Publications/Statewide-Transit-Technology-Plan-Rural-RTAs.pdf?rev=9e9e49601b8c4204adb7189ce6d1cd16&hash=9BFEE8546BCA22E1767B635AB61AFE49
[5]
Kamalesh, A., Dinesh, M., Hariharen, V., Hemanth Kumar, K., & Lokesh, P. (2023). Revolutionizing Rural Transportation: The Role of Bus Tracking Apps in Improving Mobility and Connectivity in Remote Communities. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10, 116-119. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR1DDP021.pdf
[6]
Litman, T. (2017). Public Transportation’s Impact on Rural and Small Towns, a Vital Mobility Link. American Public Transportation Association. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Resources/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA-Rural-Transit-2017.pdf
[7]
Lynott, J. (2023). Innovations in Rural Public Transportation: Data Standards under Development. https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/livable-communities/transportation/innovations-in-rural-public-transportation-data-standards-under/
[8]
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) (2023a). Public Transportation Management System Performance Indicators Report. https://www.michigan.gov/mdot/-/media/Project/Websites/MDOT/Travel/Mobility/Public-Transportation/Programs-Data/Program-Data/FY23-Ridership-Report.pdf?rev=66e13533d2d74d5ab235743b7bf1e051&hash=6345CE44B981A27961DA5588A5D48FE1
[9]
MDOT (2023b). Michigan Public Transit Facts Revenue/Expense Report. https://www.michigan.gov/mdot/-/media/Project/Websites/MDOT/Travel/Mobility/Public-Transportation/Programs-Data/Program-Data/FY23-Revenue-Expense-Report.pdf?rev=c2341e56cc5440b9ba4702e9aa2e88fa&hash=C887023CB5DD28317D0B04F512AD772D
[10]
MDOT (2024a). New Innovations for Rural Public Transit Agencies Highlighted in Video News Release. https://www.michigan.gov/mdot/news-outreach/pressreleases/2024/07/03/new-innovations-for-rural-public-transit-agencies-highlighted-in-video-news-release
[11]
MDOT (2024b). Media Event to Showcase New Innovations for Rural Public Transit Agencies. https://www.michigan.gov/mdot/news-outreach/pressreleases/2024/06/21/media-event-to-showcase-new-innovations-for-rural-public-transit-agencies
[12]
MDOT (2024c). New Innovations for Rural Public Transit Agencies Highlighted in Video News Release. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/MIDOT/bulletins/3a67897
[13]
Peterson, D., Mattson, J., & Ezekwem, K. (2020). ITS Technology Usage and Feasibility in Small Urban and Rural Transit. https://library.ndsu.edu/ir/items/f702427d-b99b-40a8-b055-5cf3f89a7bbe
[14]
Poltimäe, H., Rehema, M., Raun, J., & Poom, A. (2022). In Search of Sustainable and Inclusive Mobility Solutions for Rural Areas. European Transport Research Review, 14, Article No. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00536-3
[15]
Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2021). Mobility on Demand (MOD) and Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Similarities, Differences, and Potential Implications for Transportation in the Developing World. Transportation Sustainability Research Center. https://tsrc.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/publications/shaheen_cohen_similaritiesdifferences_modandmaas_.pdf
[16]
Small Urban and Rural Transit Center (2024). Rural Transit Fact Book 2024. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/76942
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) (2024). MDOT Rural Transit Study. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2024-10/MDOT%20-%202.pdf
[19]
Via Transportation (2022). 5 Myths about Using TransitTech in Rural Transportation Networks. https://ridewithvia.com/resources/5-myths-about-using-transittech-in-rural-transportation-networks
[20]
Yu, J., & Liu, Y. (2024). Barriers to Transportation in Rural Communities: Perspective of Older Adult Users. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 79, gbad135. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad135
[21]
Zhong, X., Bernasconi, C., & Maalouf, N. (2022). Willingness to Support Transit Index: Understanding the Impact of Political, Ideological, and Socio-Demographic Traits on Support for Public Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 24, Article 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100007