全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
投递稿件

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Digital Sovereignty in Global Trade: Analysing WTO Governance of Data Flows

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2025.162044, PP. 875-907

Keywords: Digital Trade Governance, Cross-Border Data Flows, WTO Framework, Data Localisation, Digital Sovereignty, GATS, Regulatory Coherence, Trade Liberalisation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper examines the evolving landscape of cross-border data flows within the international trade law framework, with a particular focus on the World Trade Organization’s governance mechanisms. While digital trade and data transfers have become central to global commerce, the pre-internet WTO agreements present significant interpretative challenges in regulating these phenomena. Using doctrinal analysis, this paper critically assesses the application of GATT and GATS provisions to cross-border data flows, evaluates emerging regional approaches such as the RCEP and CPTPP, and examines the tension between trade liberalisation objectives and domestic policy priorities, including data privacy and digital sovereignty. The paper argues that while existing exceptions within WTO agreements potentially accommodate legitimate public policy objectives, the current fragmented regulatory approach creates legal uncertainty and risks undermining both free trade principles and legitimate regulatory interests. The paper contributes to scholarly discourse by proposing a balanced framework that reconciles trade facilitation with recognition of national regulatory autonomy in the digital sphere.

 References

[1]  Aaronson, S. A. (2016). At the Intersection of Cross-Border Information Flows and Hu-man Rights: TPP as a Case Study. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 14, 15-23.
[2]  Aaronson, S. A. (2019). What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism? World Trade Review, 18, 541-577.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745618000198
[3]  African Union (2014). African Union Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection.
https://au.int/en/treaties/african-union-convention-cyber-security-and-personal-data-protection
[4]  APEC (2015). APEC Privacy Framework. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation.
[5]  Bhagwati, J. (1995). US Trade Policy: The Infatuation with FTAs. Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 726.
[6]  Burri, M. (2017a). The Regulation of Data Flows through Trade Agreements. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 48, 407-448.
[7]  Burri, M. (2017b). The Governance of Data and Data Flows in Trade Agreements: The Pitfalls of Legal Adaptation. UC Davis Law Review, 51, 65-132.
[8]  Burri, M. (2021). Data Flows and Global Trade Law. In M. Burri (Ed.), Big Data and Global Trade Law (pp. 11-41). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234.003
[9]  Burri, M., Polanco, R., Burri, S., & Lamin, M. (2022). Trade Agreements Provisions on Electronic-Commerce and Data. University of Lucerne.
https://www.unilu.ch/en/faculties/faculty-of-law/professorships/burri-mira/research/taped/
[10]  Casalini, F., & González, J.L. (2019). Trade and Cross-Border Data Flows. OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 220, OECD Publishing.
[11]  Casalini, F., López González, J., & Nemoto, T. (2021). Mapping Commonalities in Regulatory Approaches to Cross-Border Data Transfers. OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 248, OECD Publishing.
[12]  Chander, A. (2020). Is Data Localization a Solution for Schrems II? Journal of International Economic Law, 23, 771-784.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa024
[13]  Chander, A., & Lê, U.P. (2015). Data Nationalism. Emory Law Journal, 64, 677-739.
[14]  Ciuriak, D., & Ptashkina, M. (2018). The Digital Transformation and the Transformation of International Trade. RTA Exchange Issue Paper, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
[15]  Cohen, J. E. (2017). Law for the Platform Economy. UC Davis Law Review, 51, 133-204.
[16]  Communication from a Group of Developing Countries (2019). Development Aspects of Electronic Commerce and the Digital Economy. INF/ECOM/12, World Trade Organization.
[17]  Communication from Japan (2019). Joint Statement Initiative on Electronic Commerce. INF/ECOM/4, World Trade Organization.
[18]  Communication from the European Union (2019). Joint Statement Initiative on Electronic Commerce. INF/ECOM/5, World Trade Organization.
[19]  Court of Justice of the European Union (2020). Case C-311/18 Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems. ECLI:EU:C:2020:559.
https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-311/18
[20]  CPTPP (2018). Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/cptpp/official-documents
[21]  Dai, Y. (2022). Cross-Border Data Transfers Regulations in the Context of International Trade Law: A PRC Perspective. Springer.
[22]  Dayday, C. M. G. T. (2023). Cross-Border Data Flows and Data Regulation under International Trade Law. Philippine Law Journal, 96, 33-81.
[23]  Drahos, P. (2002). Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard‐setting. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 5, 765-789.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2002.tb00181.x
[24]  Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44, 42-79.
https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
[25]  Ferracane, M. (2017). Restrictions on Cross-Border Data Flows: A Taxonomy. ECIPE Working Paper No. 1/2017, European Centre for International Political Economy.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3089956
[26]  Gao, H. (2018). Digital or Trade? The Contrasting Approaches of China and US to Digital Trade. Journal of International Economic Law, 21, 297-321.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy015
[27]  Gasser, U. (2016). Recoding Privacy Law: Reflections on the Future Relationship among Law, Technology, and Privacy. Harvard Law Review Forum, 130, 61-70.
[28]  GATS (1995). General Agreement on Trade in Services, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1B, 1869 U.N.T.S. 183, 33 I.L.M. 1167.
[29]  GATT (1994). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A, 1867 U.N.T.S. 187, 33 I.L.M. 1153.
[30]  GDPR (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data. Official Journal of the European Union, 119, 1.
[31]  Gervais, D. (2016). Regulation of Transborder Data Flows under Data Protection and Privacy Law: Past, Present and Future. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 187, OECD Publishing.
[32]  Greenleaf, G. (2021). Global Data Privacy Laws 2021: Despite COVID Delays, 145 Laws Show GDPR Dominance (pp. 1-5). Privacy Laws & Business International Report 169.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3836348
[33]  Gurumurthy, A., Vasudevan, A., & Chami, N. (2017). The Grand Myth of Cross-Border Data Flows in Trade Deals. IT for Change.
https://itforchange.net/grand-myth-of-cross-border-data-flows-trade-deals
[34]  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). Adopted 16 December 1966, Entered into force 23 March 1976, 999 UNTS 171.
[35]  International Organization for Standardization (2016). How the Internet of Things Will Change Our Lives. ISO Focus.
https://www.iso.org/news/2016/09/Ref2112.html
[36]  Kelsey, J. (2018). How a TPP-Style E-Commerce Outcome in the WTO Would Endanger the Development Dimension of the GATS Acquis (and Potentially the WTO). Journal of International Economic Law, 21, 273-295.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy024
[37]  Kuner, C. (2009). Developing an Adequate Legal Framework for International Data Transfers. In S. Gutwirth, et al. (Eds.), Reinventing Data Protection? (pp. 263-273). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9498-9_16
[38]  Kuner, C. (2010). Regulation of Transborder Data Flows under Data Protection and Privacy Law: Past, Present, and Future. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 187, OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1689483
[39]  Lateef, M. A., & Akinsulore, A. O. (2021). COVID-19: Implications for Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Africa. Beijing Law Review, 12, 139-160.
https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2021.121008
[40]  Lemley, M. A. (1998). The Law and Economics of Internet Norms. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 73, 1257-1294.
[41]  Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Stamenov, K., & Dhingra, D. (2016). Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows. McKinsey Global Institute.
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flows
[42]  Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (1994). Adopted 15 April 1994, Entered into Force 1 January 1995, 1867 UNTS 154.
[43]  Meltzer, J. P. (2014). The Internet, Cross‐Border Data Flows and International Trade. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2, 90-102.
https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.60
[44]  Mitchell, A. D., & Hepburn, J. (2018). WTO and Digital Trade. In T. Cottier, & M. Oesch (Eds.), Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade (pp. 196-221). Cambridge University Press.
[45]  Mitchell, A. D., & Mishra, N. (2018). Data at the Docks: Modernizing International Trade Law for the Digital Economy. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 20, 1073-1134.
[46]  Mitchell, A. D., & Mishra, N. (2021). WTO Law and Cross-Border Data Flows: An Un-finished Agenda. In M. Burri (Ed.), Big Data and Global Trade Law (pp. 83-112). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234.006
[47]  Nicolaïdis, K. (2020). Mutual Recognition: Promise and Denial, from Sapiens to Brexit. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 124, 114-135.
[48]  OECD (2013). OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. OECD Publishing.
[49]  OECD (2019). Trade and Cross-Border Data Flows. OECD Trade Policy Brief. OECD Publishing.
[50]  OECD (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment. OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. OECD Publishing.
[51]  RCEP (2020). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, Signed 15 November 2020, Entered into Force 1 January 2022.
https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/
[52]  Streinz, T. (2019). Digital Megaregulation Uncontested? TPP’s Model for the Global Digital Economy. In B. Kingsbury, et al. (Eds.), Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering after TPP (pp. 312-342). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825296.003.0014
[53]  Streinz, T. (2021). RCEP’s Contribution to Global Data Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3826217
[54]  Trachtman, J. P. (1999). The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution. Harvard International Law Journal, 40, 333-377.
[55]  UNCTAD (2019). Digital Economy Report 2019: Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries. United Nations.
[56]  UNCTAD (2021). Digital Economy Report 2021: Cross-Border Data Flows and Development: For Whom the Data Flow. United Nations.
[57]  Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Adopted 10 December 1948, UNGA Res 217 A(III).
[58]  Wang, W. (2020). Securing Cyberspace: China’s National Cybersecurity Strategy and Legislation. In E. Bertino, P. Samarati, & J. Zhou (Eds.), Cloud Computing and Security (pp. 119-138). Springer.
[59]  Wiener, J. B. (2009). The Global Internet Governance Landscape I: Norms, Standards and Institutions. In L. A. Bygrave, & J. Bing (Eds.), Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions (pp. 155-192). Oxford University Press.
[60]  World Trade Organization (2001). Korea—Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef. Appellate Body Report, WT/DS161/AB/R, WT/DS169/AB/R.
[61]  World Trade Organization (2005). United States—Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services. Appellate Body Report, WT/DS285/AB/R.
[62]  World Trade Organization (2010). China—Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products. Appellate Body Report, WT/DS363/AB/R.
[63]  World Trade Organization (2019). Russia—Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit. World Trade Organization, WT/DS512/R.
[64]  WTO (1991). Services Sectoral Classification List. MTN.GNS/W/120, World Trade Organization.
[65]  WTO (2019). Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce. WT/L/1056, World Trade Organization.
[66]  WTO (2020). World Trade Report 2020: Government Policies to Promote Innovation in the Digital Age. World Trade Organization.
[67]  WTO (2021). E-Commerce Negotiations: Members Finalize “Clean Text” on Unsolicited Commercial Messages. World Trade Organization.
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/ecom_05feb21_e.htm
[68]  WTO Ministerial Conference (1998). Declaration on Global Electronic Commerce. WT/MIN(98)/DEC/2. World Trade Organization.
[69]  Wu, T. (2006). The World Trade Law of Censorship and Internet Filtering. Chicago Journal of International Law, 7, 263-287.
[70]  Yakovleva, S., & Irion, K. (2016). The Best of Both Worlds? Free Trade in Services and EU Law on Privacy and Data Protection. European Data Protection Law Review, 2, 191-208.
https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2016/2/9
[71]  Yakovleva, S., & Irion, K. (2020). Pitching Trade against Privacy: Reconciling EU Governance of Personal Data Flows with External Trade. International Data Privacy Law, 10, 201-221.
https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipaa003

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133