全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Ethical AI in Banking: A Sectoral Literature Review with Case-Based Interventions

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2025.134125, PP. 2420-2430

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Banking, Governance Frameworks, Explainable AI, Algorithmic Bias, Customer Trust, Transparency, Ethical AI Practices

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into banking, concerns around bias, privacy, and governance are becoming increasingly urgent. This article explores the ethical risks of AI in financial services and reviews practical interventions that can help banks use AI responsibly. Drawing from literature and real-world examples from institutions like JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, HSBC, Bank of America, Triodos Bank and Credit Union Australia, the study highlights five key strategies: implementing Explainable AI (XAI), using bias detection tools, forming ethics committees, educating customers, and aligning with global standards such as the EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles, and NIST AI RMF. The article evaluates tools like IBM’s AI Fairness 360, Google’s What-If Tool, and Fairkit-learn for detecting and mitigating bias in automated decisions. While challenges such as cost, technical complexity, and organizational resistance exist, especially for smaller banks, the findings show that ethical, transparent AI is achievable and scalable. The paper concludes that strong leadership, stakeholder engagement, and policy alignment are critical for building AI systems that are fair, trustworthy, and fit for the future of banking.

References

[1]  Al-Harbi, A. (2025). Navigating Ethics and Regulation: The Role of AI in Modern Financial Services. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 25, 325-335.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2025/v25i11653
[2]  Ali, S. J., Christin, A., Smart, A., & Katila, R. (2023). Walking the Walk of AI Ethics: Organizational Challenges and the Individualization of Risk among Ethics Entrepreneurs. In 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency (pp. 217-226). ACM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3593990
[3]  Bank of America (n.d.). Meet Erica, Your Virtual Financial Assistant.
https://promotions.bankofamerica.com/digitalbanking/mobilebanking/erica
[4]  Bell, A., Nov, O., & Stoyanovich, J. (2023). Think about the Stakeholders First! toward an Algorithmic Transparency Playbook for Regulatory Compliance. Data & Policy, 5, e12.
https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.8
[5]  Bellamy, R. K. E., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K. et al. (2019). AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 63, 4:1-4:15.
https://doi.org/10.1147/jrd.2019.2942287
[6]  Botunac, I., Parlov, N., & Bosna, J. (2024). Opportunities of Gen AI in the Banking Industry with Regards to the AI Act, GDPR, Data Act and Dora. In 2024 13th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/meco62516.2024.10577936
[7]  Butcher, J., & Beridze, I. (2019). What Is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally? The RUSI Journal, 164, 88-96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260
[8]  Cath, C. (2018). Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal and Technical Opportunities and Challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, Article 20180080.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080
[9]  Cornacchia, G., Narducci, F., & Ragone, A. (2021). Improving the User Experience and the Trustworthiness of Financial Services. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 264-269). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_19
[10]  Daneshjou, R., Smith, M. P., Sun, M. D., Rotemberg, V., & Zou, J. (2021). Lack of Transparency and Potential Bias in Artificial Intelligence Data Sets and Algorithms. JAMA Dermatology, 157, 1362-1369.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3129
[11]  de Hond, A. A. H., van Buchem, M. M., & Hernandez-Boussard, T. (2022). Picture a Data Scientist: A Call to Action for Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Age of Ai. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29, 2178-2181.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac156
[12]  de Lange, P. E., Melsom, B., Vennerød, C. B., & Westgaard, S. (2022). Explainable AI for Credit Assessment in Banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, Article 556.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120556
[13]  Eghaghe, V. O., Osundare, O. S., Ewim, C. P., & Okeke, I. C. (2024). Navigating the Ethical and Governance Challenges of AI Deployment in AML Practices within the Financial Industry. International Journal of Scholarly Research and Reviews, 5, 30-51.
https://doi.org/10.56781/ijsrr.2024.5.2.0047
[14]  Eitel-Porter, R. (2021). Beyond the Promise: Implementing Ethical AI. AI and Ethics, 1, 73-80.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6
[15]  Falco, G., Shneiderman, B., Badger, J., Carrier, R., Dahbura, A., Danks, D. et al. (2021). Governing AI Safety through Independent Audits. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 566-571.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7
[16]  Fares, O. H., Butt, I., & Lee, S. H. M. (2022). Utilization of Artificial Intelligence in the Banking Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28, 835-852.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-022-00176-7
[17]  Gasser, U. (2023). An EU Landmark for AI Governance. Science, 380, 1203-1203.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj1627
[18]  González-Fernández, M., & González-Velasco, C. (2020). An Alternative Approach to Predicting Bank Credit Risk in Europe with Google Data. Finance Research Letters, 35, Article 101281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.029
[19]  Haider, C. M. R., Clifton, C., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Unfair AI: It Isn’t Just Biased Data. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 957-962). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm54844.2022.00114
[20]  Hassani, B. K. (2021). Societal Bias Reinforcement through Machine Learning: A Credit Scoring Perspective. AI and Ethics, 1, 239-247.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00026-z
[21]  Hine, C. (2021). Evaluating the Prospects for University-Based Ethical Governance in Artificial Intelligence and Data-Driven Innovation. Research Ethics, 17, 464-479.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211022790
[22]  HSBC (n.d.). Responsible AI.
https://www.gbm.hsbc.com/en-gb/campaigns/artificial-intelligence
[23]  Hu, B., & Wu, Y. (2023). Unlocking Causal Relationships in Commercial Banking Risk Management: An Examination of Explainable AI Integration with Multi-Factor Risk Models. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 12, 262-274.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2023.123014
[24]  Johnson, B., Bartola, J., Angell, R., Witty, S., Giguere, S., & Brun, Y. (2022). Fairkit, Fairkit, on the Wall, Who’s the Fairest of Them All? Supporting Fairness-Related Decision-Making. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 11, Article 100031.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100031
[25]  Kidron, A., & Kreis, Y. (2020). Listening to Bank Customers: The Meaning of Trust. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 12, 355-370.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-10-2019-0120
[26]  Kinger, S., & Kulkarni, V. (2023). Demystifying the Black Box: An Overview of Explainability Methods in Machine Learning. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 46, 90-100.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212x.2023.2285533
[27]  Kleiser, S. B., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Hawkins, D. I. (2019). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
https://online.vitalsource.com/books/97812601581821
[28]  Kulothungan, V. (2024). A Blockchain-Enabled Approach to Cross-Border Compliance and Trust. In 2024 IEEE 6th International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems, and Applications (TPS-ISA) (pp. 446-454). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tps-isa62245.2024.00060
[29]  Majumder, S., Chakraborty, J., Bai, G. R., Stolee, K. T., & Menzies, T. (2023). Fair Enough: Searching for Sufficient Measures of Fairness. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32, 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3585006
[30]  Mökander, J. (2023). Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches. Digital Society, 2, Article No. 49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00074-y
[31]  Morgan Chase, J. P. (n.d.). Explainable AI Center of Excellence.
https://www.jpmorgan.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/initiatives/explainable-ai-center-of-excellence
[32]  Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
[33]  Oldemeyer, L., Jede, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2024). Investigation of Artificial Intelligence in SMEs: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art and the Main Implementation Challenges. Management Review Quarterly, 75, 1185-1227.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00405-4
[34]  Owolabi, O. S., Uche, P. C., Adeniken, N. T., Ihejirika, C., Islam, R. B., & Chhetri, B. J. T. (2024). Ethical Implication of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption in Financial Decision Making. Computer and Information Science, 17, 49-57.
https://doi.org/10.5539/cis.v17n1p49
[35]  Pagano, T. P., Loureiro, R. B., Lisboa, F. V. N., Peixoto, R. M., Guimarães, G. A. S., Cruz, G. O. R. et al. (2023). Bias and Unfairness in Machine Learning Models: A Systematic Review on Datasets, Tools, Fairness Metrics, and Identification and Mitigation Methods. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7, Article 15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010015
[36]  Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Buchanan, D. A. (2022). Managing Organizational Change: A Multiple Perspective Approach (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
[37]  Papenmeier, A., Kern, D., Englebienne, G., & Seifert, C. (2022). It’s Complicated: The Relationship between User Trust, Model Accuracy and Explanations in AI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29, 1-33.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3495013
[38]  Pérez, Á. P. (2022). Bias in Artificial Intelligence Models in Financial Services. Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3539561
[39]  Qahtani, E. H. A., & Alsmairat, M. A. K. (2023). Assisting Artificial Intelligence Adoption Drivers in Human Resources Management: A Mediation Model. Acta Logistica, 10, 141-150.
https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v10i1.371
[40]  Ridzuan, N. N., Masri, M., Anshari, M., Fitriyani, N. L., & Syafrudin, M. (2024). AI in the Financial Sector: The Line between Innovation, Regulation and Ethical Responsibility. Information, 15, Article 432.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080432
[41]  Sarwal, K., & Islam, S. R. (2024). Algorithmic Lending Bias: Evaluating the Fairness of Historical Redlining in Loan Approvals. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 7412-7416). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825978
[42]  Walter, Y. (2024). Managing the Race to the Moon: Global Policy and Governance in Artificial Intelligence Regulation—A Contemporary Overview and an Analysis of Socioeconomic Consequences. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article No. 14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00109-4
[43]  Wick, J. (2024). AI-Powered GRC in Banking and Financial Services. Hitachi Digital Services Website.
https://www.hitachids.com/insight/ai-powered-grc-in-banking-and-financial-services/

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133