The complexity of the work environment on board a ship, which includes the main engine, generator, hydraulic system, and other supporting equipment, requires a systematic approach in risk management. Each system has different maintenance characteristics that have the potential hazards, ranging from electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, to thermal systems. The purpose of this study is to analyze in depth the effectiveness of the implementation of the Lockout Tagout (LOTO) system in improving work safety on board ships, by considering various complex factors that influence its implementation. This study uses a mixed-methods approach with a comprehensive quantitative-qualitative research design to analyze the effectiveness of the LOTO system in improving work safety on board ships by adopting a multi-instrument approach for comprehensive data collection on the implementation of LOTO procedures on merchant ships, consisting of a structured questionnaire to measure the level of crew understanding of LOTO procedures, assess perceptions of work safety, and identify barriers to implementation. The results show that the level of understanding of LOTO procedures reached an average score of 3.55 indicating good but not optimal awareness among crew members. The inhibiting factors for LOTO implementation indicate that the variation of engine systems with a score of 3.62 is the most significant challenge. The effectiveness of LOTO implementation showed positive results, with the highest score in the accident prevention aspect 4.12 which was categorized as very effective. The compliance index reached 3.87 indicating that most respondents had implemented the procedure well. These findings yield practical implications in the form of the need for ongoing training, adaptive LOTO procedures, comprehensive documentation systems, and strengthening of safety culture.
References
[1]
Baig, M.Z., Lagdami, K. and Mejia Jr., M.Q. (2024) Enhancing Maritime Safety: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Opportunities in the Domestic Ferry Sector. Maritime Technology and Research, 6, Article ID: 268911. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2024.268911
[2]
Guner, S. (2023) Importance of Electrical Single Line at Lock Out Tag Out (LOTO) Applications. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 13, 152-170. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2023.133008
[3]
da Rocha, F.R.C. (2023) Implementation of Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Methodologies on Production Lines. Master’s Thesis, Instituto Politecnico do Porto (Portugal). https://search.proquest.com/openview/37312fceb107c4c738577609c4bd053d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
[4]
Lehikko, A., Nykänen, M., Lukander, K., Uusitalo, J. and Ruokamo, H. (2024) Exploring Interactivity Effects on Learners’ Sense of Agency, Cognitive Load, and Learning Outcomes in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Mixed Methods Study. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, Article ID: 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100066
[5]
Celik, M. (2009) Designing of Integrated Quality and Safety Management System (IQSMS) for Shipping Operations. Safety Science, 47, 569-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.002
[6]
Widiatmaka, F.P., Prasetyo, A.N., Suherman, S., Sularno, H., Cahyadi, T., Pranyoto, P., et al. (2024) Quality of Transportation Infrastructure and Trade Facilities: Opportunities and Challenges in Increasing Trade and Economic Productivity. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 18, 521-528. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.18.03.05
[7]
Akamangwa, N. (2016) Working for the Environment and against Safety: How Compliance Affects Health and Safety on Board Ships. Safety Science, 87, 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.027
[8]
Pedersen, S. and Ahsan, D. (2020) Emergency Preparedness and Response: Insights from the Emerging Offshore Wind Industry. Safety Science, 121, 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.022
[9]
Wang, X., Sasangohar, F., Payne, S. and Mehta, R.K. (2024) Safety Culture and Worker Fatigue Management in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: An Interview Study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 102, Article ID: 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103614
[10]
Ravi, M. (2018) Implementation Strategy of Lock Out and Tag Out (LOTO) Electrical Systems for Paper Industry. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30954/2322-0465.1.2018.1
[11]
Illankoon, P., Manathunge, Y., Tretten, P., Abeysekara, J. and Singh, S. (2019) Lockout and Tagout in a Manufacturing Setting from a Situation Awareness Perspective. Safety, 5, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5020025
[12]
Eliopoulou, E., Papanikolaou, A. and Voulgarellis, M. (2016) Statistical Analysis of Ship Accidents and Review of Safety Level. Safety Science, 85, 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.001
[13]
Mutawe, A.M., Tsunehara, R. and Glaspey, L.A. (2002) OSHA’s Lockout/Tagout Standards: A Review of Key Requirements. Professional Safety, 47, 20-24.
[14]
Chan, A.P.C., Wong, F.K.W., Hon, C.K.H. and Choi, T.N.Y. (2018) A Bayesian Network Model for Reducing Accident Rates of Electrical and Mechanical (E&M) Work. (International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, Article 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112496
[15]
Jimenez, V.J., Kim, H. and Munim, Z.H. (2022) A Review of Ship Energy Efficiency Research and Directions Towards Emission Reduction in the Maritime Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, Article ID: 132888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132888
[16]
Rumawas, V. (2025) Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation: Experiential Learning. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2382315/Vincentius%20Rumawas_PhD.pdf?sequence=1
[17]
Wang, J. (2002) Offshore Safety Case Approach and Formal Safety Assessment of Ships. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 81-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00005-1
[18]
Marple, S.R. and Honary, F. (2004) A Multi-Instrument Data Analysis Toolbox. Advances in Polar Upper Atmosphere Research, 18, 120-130.
[19]
Markoff, J., Shapiro, G. and Weitman, S.R. (1975) Toward the Integration of Content Analysis and General Methodology. Sociological Methodology, 6, 1-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/270893
[20]
Veazey Brooks, J. and Bosk, C.L. (2012) Remaking Surgical Socialization: Work Hour Restrictions, Rites of Passage, and Occupational Identity. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.007
[21]
Finn, A. and Scheding, S. (2010) Developments and Challenges for Autonomous Un-manned Vehicles. Springer.
[22]
Chenhall, R.H. (2003) Management Control Systems Design within Its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency-Based Research and Directions for the Future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00027-7