全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Forest Product Measurement Systems in the World—Measurement of Wood and Fuelwood Products Measurement Systems around the World a Social, Economic, Environmental and Cultural Approach

DOI: 10.4236/jep.2025.165025, PP. 497-507

Keywords: Poor Forest Measurement, Social Effects of Measurement, Deforestation, Timber and Cubing Rules, A Technical, Social, Economic and Environmental Approach

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The measurement of forest products has an impact on the economic-social and environmental areas of a region, that is, on the economic and sustainable development of a country. Measurement systems at the global level have not been homogenized because there are technical deficiencies in the measurement process allowing the plundering of forest resources and causing the impoverishment of workers, due to unfair piecework, leaving the inhabitants with negative externalities. The measurement of forest products is complex due to the factors involved in quantifying the volume of a piece. There are countless methods, many very local. In the United States and Canada there are more than 95 rules or formulas in current use out of about 185 in existence. There are systems such as the JAS (Japanese Agricultural Standard) Rule or formula, which is currently being adopted in Japan, Chile, East Asia, and Oceania. Artificial Intelligence is also used for measurement. The company Timbeter? has been venturing into almost all countries using various formulas and calculating the volume with the use of a Tablet or a Smartphone, taking a photo of the wood to be cubed. This method is too expensive. Only countries with a lot of forests are acquiring it. Artificial Intelligence technology will displace most of the methods currently used, without erroneous factors in the payment of piecework. Although traditionalism in some regions of the world considers it difficult to train the workforce. This article presents the most commonly used methods, rules and formulas today, the methods of cubic volume measurement or table foot prediction, and finally the measurement of firewood that has its own cubing methods. The foregoing takes the economic and social aspects of the inhabitants of the forests as a context. The conditions for empirical study are not yet present. The objective of this study is to show the methods and formulas of measurement, clarifying that it does not intend to compare with the Japanese Agriculture System JAS which is the most used in the world, nor with the Timbeter method, which is venturing into the world market, it is only a historical tour of the ways of measuring the volume of forest products.

References

[1]  Mora-Silva, B.A., Jesús Alejandr, S.C., Eusebio, M.A., Compeán-Guzmán, F.J. and Prieto-Ruíz, J.A. (2024) Analysis of the Methods of Cubing of Round Cuts in the Forestry Industry in the State of Durango.
[2]  Borrás, X. (2010) A Brief History of Wood as a Building Material. FIMMA 2024, Valencia, 14-17 May 2010, 18 p.
https://www.interempresas.net/Madera/Articulos/44265-Breve-historia-de-lwood-as-material-de-construccion.html
[3]  (2006) Strategic Forestry Program 2030 Durango. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 200.
[4]  Freese, F. (1973) A Collection of Log Rules. Forest Products Laboratory. Forest Ser-vice. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
[5]  Robinson, J.M. (1967) The History of Wood Measurement in Canada. International Report FMR-7. Forest Manage. Beef. and Serv. Inst, 185.
[6]  Ziegler, E. (1909) The Standardization o Flog Measure. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters, 4, 172-184
[7]  Business Research Insight (2024) Summary of the Timber Market Report.
https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/es/enquiry/request-sample-pdf/wood-market-110755
[8]  Izco, F.C. (2022) Forest Measurements Manual. Government of Navarre, 88.
[9]  Belyea, H.C. (1931) Forest Mensuration. John Whiley & Sons, 319.
[10]  Chapman, H.H. (1921) The Measurement of Logs and the Construction of Log Rules. Lumberman, 103, 114-117
[11]  Graves, H.S. (1905) Methods of Scaling Logs. Forest Quarts, 3, 245-254.
[12]  McKenzie, H.E. (1915) A Discussion of Log Rules, Their Limitations and Suggestions for Correction. Palala Press, 56.
[13]  (2010) Instructions on Wood Cubing for Forest Controls on Land Roads. S/F. Ministry of the Environment of Peru, 3.
[14]  (2025) Idaho State Forestry Contest.
https://www.idl.idaho.gov/about-forestry/idaho-state-forestry-contest/
[15]  Sloman (2010) Sloman.
[16]  National Forest Inventory (Australia) and Australia Bureau of Rural Sciences (1998) Social Dimensions of Forests. In: National Forest Inventory (Australia) and Australia Bureau of Rural Sciences, Eds., Australias State of the Forests Report 1998, 143-154.
[17]  Magee, L., Scerri, A., James, P., Thom, J.A., Padgham, L., Hickmott, S., et al. (2012) Reframing Social Sustainability Reporting: Towards an Engaged Approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 225-243.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2
[18]  Baskent, E.Z. (2020) A Framework for Characterizing and Regulating Ecosystem Services in a Management Planning Context. Forests, 11, Article 102.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010102
[19]  Mikkilä, M., Kolehmainen, O. and Pukkala, T. (2005) Multi-Attribute Assessment of Acceptability of Operations in the Pulp and Paper Industries. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 227-243.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00062-5
[20]  Shindler, B.A. and Brunson, M.W. (2004) Social Acceptability in Forest and Range Management. In: Manfredo, M.J., Vaske, J., Bruyere, B.L., Field, D.R. and Brown, P.J., Eds., Society and Natural Resources: A Summary of Knowledge, Modern Litho, 147-157.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133