全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Variable Step Normalized Least Mean Square Guided by Composite Desired Signal for Few-View Computed Tomography Denoising

DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2025.161001, PP. 1-17

Keywords: CT Image Denoising, Regularization Parameter, -Smoothing, VSNLMS, Few-View Reconstruction

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Low-dose CT provides essential diagnostic information while minimizing radiation exposure through few-view reconstruction techniques. However, these techniques often introduce noise and artifacts, affecting diagnostic accuracy. Although L 0 -smoothing regularization methods partially address these issues, their fixed sparsity constraint cannot adapt to CT image complex characteristics, and they remain highly sensitive to regularization parameter selection. Objective: To propose a novel CT image denoising method named Variable Step Normalized Least Mean Square L 0 -smoothing (VSNLMS- L 0 ) that achieves an optimal balance between noise reduction and structural preservation while reducing sensitivity to regularization parameter selection. Methods: The VSNLMS- L 0 method employs an adaptive framework that dynamically responds to local image characteristics. The variable step-size strategy enables precise calibration of processing intensity across regions with varying noise levels and detail complexity, ingeniously combining filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction results with L 0 -smoothing to create a composite desired signal. Conclusions: This approach offers an effective solution for enhancing low-dose CT image quality and improving diagnostic reliability.

References

[1]  Tang, L., Hui, Y., Yang, H., Zhao, Y. and Tian, C. (2022) Medical Image Fusion Quality Assessment Based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, Article 986153.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.986153
[2]  Wang, T., Chen, C., Shen, K., Liu, W. and Tian, C. (2023) Streak Artifact Suppressed Back Projection for Sparse-View Photoacoustic Computed Tomography. Applied Optics, 62, 3917-3925.
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.487957
[3]  Balda, M., Hornegger, J. and Heismann, B. (2012) Ray Contribution Masks for Structure Adaptive Sinogram Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 31, 1228-1239.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2012.2187213
[4]  Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J.D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J.M., McCollough, C.M., et al. (2009) Projection Space Denoising with Bilateral Filtering and CT Noise Modeling for Dose Reduction in Ct. Medical Physics, 36, 4911-4919.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3232004
[5]  Wang, T., Kudo, H., Yamazaki, F. and Liu, H. (2019) A Fast Regularized Iterative Algorithm for Fan-Beam CT Reconstruction. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 64, Article 145006.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab22ed
[6]  Wang, S., Wu, W., Feng, J., Liu, F. and Yu, H. (2020) Low-Dose Spectral CT Reconstruction Based on Image-Gradient L0-Norm and Adaptive Spectral PICCS. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65, Article 245005.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aba7cf
[7]  Chen, Z., Jin, X., Li, L. and Wang, G. (2013) A Limited-Angle CT Reconstruction Method Based on Anisotropic TV Minimization. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58, 2119-2141.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/7/2119
[8]  Xia, W., Yang, Z., Lu, Z., Wang, Z. and Zhang, Y. (2024) RegFormer: A Local-Nonlocal Regularization-Based Model for Sparse-View CT Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 8, 184-194.
https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2023.3281148
[9]  Yu, H., Wang, S., Wu, W., Gong, C., Wang, L., Pi, Z., et al. (2021) Weighted Adaptive Non-Local Dictionary for Low-Dose CT Reconstruction. Signal Processing, 180, Article 107871.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107871
[10]  Wu, D., Kim, K., El Fakhri, G. and Li, Q. (2017) Iterative Low-Dose CT Reconstruction with Priors Trained by Artificial Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36, 2479-2486.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2017.2753138
[11]  Yang, C., Wu, P., Gong, S., Wang, J., Lyu, Q., Tang, X., et al. (2017) Shading Correction Assisted Iterative Cone-Beam CT Reconstruction. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 62, 8495-8520.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa8e62
[12]  Mallat, S. and Hwang, W.L. (1992) Singularity Detection and Processing with Wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38, 617-643.
https://doi.org/10.1109/18.119727
[13]  Rudin, L.I., Osher, S. and Fatemi, E. (1992) Nonlinear Total Variation Based Noise Removal Algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60, 259-268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f
[14]  Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V. and Egiazarian, K. (2007) Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16, 2080-2095.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2007.901238
[15]  Xu, L., Lu, C., Xu, Y. and Jia, J. (2011) Image Smoothing via L0 Gradient Minimization. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 30, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2070781.2024208
[16]  Zheng, A., Gao, H., Zhang, L. and Xing, Y. (2020) A Dual-Domain Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Method for Fully 3D Sparse Data Helical CT. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65, 245030.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab8fc1
[17]  Kang, E., Min, J. and Ye, J.C. (2017) A Deep Convolutional Neural Network Using Directional Wavelets for Low‐Dose X‐Ray CT Reconstruction. Medical Physics, 44, e360-e375.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12344
[18]  Wu, D., Kim, K. and Li, Q. (2019) Computationally Efficient Deep Neural Network for Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction. Medical Physics, 46, 4763-4776.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13627
[19]  Bao, P., Sun, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Xia, W., Yang, K., et al. (2019) Convolutional Sparse Coding for Compressed Sensing CT Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38, 2607-2619.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2019.2906853
[20]  Lu, W., Onofrey, J.A., Lu, Y., Shi, L., Ma, T., Liu, Y., et al. (2019) An Investigation of Quantitative Accuracy for Deep Learning Based Denoising in Oncological Pet. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 64, Article 165019.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab3242
[21]  Yang, Q., Yan, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Shi, Y., Mou, X., et al. (2018) Low-Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network with Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Loss. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 37, 1348-1357.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2018.2827462
[22]  Dong, X., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Higgins, K., Liu, T., Curran, W.J., et al. (2020) Deep Learning-Based Attenuation Correction in the Absence of Structural Information for Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65, Article 055011.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab652c
[23]  Corda-D’Incan, G., Schnabel, J.A. and Reader, A.J. (2022) Memory-Efficient Training for Fully Unrolled Deep Learned PET Image Reconstruction with Iteration-Dependent Targets. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 6, 552-563.
https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2021.3101947
[24]  Slock, D.T.M. (1993) On the Convergence Behavior of the LMS and the Normalized LMS Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41, 2811-2825.
https://doi.org/10.1109/78.236504
[25]  Eweda, E., Bershad, N.J. and Bermudez, J.C.M. (2018) Stochastic Analysis of the LMS and NLMS Algorithms for Cyclostationary White Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Inputs. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66, 4753-4765.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2018.2860552
[26]  Setiadi, D.R.I.M. (2020) PSNR vs SSIM: Imperceptibility Quality Assessment for Image Steganography. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80, 8423-8444.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10035-z

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133