全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

英语回声疑问句应答机制最简句法分析
A Minimalist Account of the Response Mechanism in English Echo Questions

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.135497, PP. 465-471

Keywords: 回声疑问句,非选择性约束理论,语域赋值,语域歧义性
Echo Questions
, Unselective Binding Theory, Scope Valuing Hypothesis, Scope Ambiguity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文基于最简方案的理论框架,依托语域赋值假说和非选择性约束理论对英语中的回声疑问句进行句法分析。当回声疑问句以单独形式出现时,对于回声问句的应答必须要包含对所有的疑问词的应答;而当回声疑问句作为嵌入句,成为主句的一部分时,应答者被允许只对部分疑问词进行应答。这主要源于在多疑问词条件下,携带不可解读特征[*uWH]的多个标句词成为赋值对象的多种潜在选择,由此引发的广窄域语域指派使得应答者做出或完整或部分的应答,最终导致语域的歧义性。
Based on the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program, this paper analyzes the syntax of echo questions in English by means of Scope Valuing Hypothesis and Unselective Binding Theory. When the echo question appears as a separate form, the answer to it must include the answer to all the wh-questions; when it follows a verb as an embedded clause, the respondent is allowed to respond to only part of the wh-question. This is mainly due to the fact that under the condition of multiple wh-questions, more than one complementizers with strong uninterpretable feature [*uWH] become potential objects to be valued with scope, and the resulting wide-narrow scope valuing difference causes the respondent to make a complete or partial response, which ultimately leads to the scope ambiguity.

References

[1]  Adger, D. (2003) Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001
[2]  Chomsky, N. (1977) On Wh-Movement. In: Culicover, P., Wasow, T. and Akmajian, A., Eds., Formal Syntax, Academic Press, 71-132.
[3]  Rizzi, L. and Cinque, G. (2016) Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 139-163.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040827
[4]  温宾利. 英语“驴句”与汉语的“什么…什么句” [J]. 现代外语,1997(3): 3-15.
[5]  伍雅清. 特殊疑问句研究[J]. 现代外语, 1999(1): 75-107.
[6]  Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
[7]  Sobin, N. (2010) Echo Questions in the Minimalist Program. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 131-148.
https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.1.131
[8]  Tsai, W.D. (1994) On Nominal Islands and LF Extraction in Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 12, 121-175.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992747
[9]  Carlson, L. (1983) Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
[10]  Quirk, R., et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
[11]  石毓智. 疑问和感叹之认知关系——汉英感叹句的共性与个性[J]. 外语研究, 2004(6): 1-8.
[12]  陆俭明. 关于现代汉语里的疑问语气词[J]. 中国语文, 1984(5): 330-336.
[13]  沈炯. 汉语语调模型刍议[J]. 语文研究, 1992(4): 16-24.
[14]  沈炯. 汉语语调构造和语调类型[J]. 方言, 1994(3): 221-228.
[15]  沈炯. 汉语语调分类和标记方法试说[J]. 语言文字应用, 1998(1): 104-106.
[16]  Brown, G., Currie, K. and Kenworthy, J. (1980) Questions of Intonation. Croom Helm.
[17]  Banfield, A. (2014) Unspeakable Sentences. Routledge.
[18]  Cooper, R. (1983) Quantification and Syntactic Theory. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
[19]  Huddleston, R. (1984) Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139165785
[20]  Carnie, A. (2021) Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Blackwell.
[21]  毛眺源. 中国英语学习者导句语类©习得研究[D]: [博士毕业论文]. 北京: 北京外国语大学, 2016.
[22]  Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001) T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In: Kenstowicz, M., Ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language, The MIT Press, 355-426.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0014
[23]  Lewis, D. (1975) Adverbs of Quantification. In: Lewis, D., Ed., Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, 3-15.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511897696.003
[24]  Pesetsky, D. (1987) WH-In-Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding. In: Reuland, E. and ter Meulen, A., Eds., The Representation of Definiteness, MIT Press, 98-129.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133