数字技术伦理视域下价值冲突、舆论引导与协同治理研究
Research on Value Conflicts, Public Opinion Guidance, and Collaborative Governance under the Ethical Perspective of Digital Technology

在数字技术加速发展的当下，其伦理风险愈发显著，对社会价值观、舆论生态以及技术可持续发展构成了复杂且多维的挑战。本文基于数字技术伦理的视角，深入剖析了价值观、社会舆论与数字技术之间的互构机制及其伦理困境。研究发现，价值观作为舆论演变的核心驱动力，通过塑造个体认知与行为模式，间接影响社会舆论走向。同时，数字技术的传播方式与速度深刻影响着舆论的扩散与演变，而价值观也直接指导着数字技术的开发与应用。三者形成了一个相互依存、相互影响的逻辑闭环。然而，网络技术的广泛应用导致了人主体性的消解、虚拟交互中的情感道德缺失、无中心传播模式下共识性舆论形成的困境以及去中心化传播对主流价值观权威的挑战。这些困境不仅削弱了个体的主体性与独立思考能力，还加剧了社会价值分化与舆论极化，对社会的稳定与和谐构成了潜在威胁。为此，本文提出了针对性的化解路径，包括强化数字伦理教育与意识提升、构建多主体协同参与的治理体系以及完善法律法规与伦理审查机制。通过这些路径，旨在构建一个更加完善的数字伦理体系，以应对数字技术发展带来的伦理挑战，推动数字技术在符合伦理规范的前提下促进社会的全面进步与可持续发展。
With the accelerated development of digital technology, its ethical risks have become increasingly salient, presenting complex and multidimensional challenges to social values, the public opinion ecosystem, and the sustainable development of technology. This paper, from the perspective of digital technology ethics, provides an in-depth analysis of the co-constitutive mechanisms and ethical dilemmas between values, public opinion, and digital technology. The study reveals that values, as the core driving force in the evolution of public opinion, indirectly shape their trajectory by influencing individual cognition and behavioral patterns. At the same time, the dissemination methods and speed of digital technology profoundly impact the diffusion and evolution of public opinion, while values also directly guide the development and application of digital technology. These three elements form a logically interdependent and mutually influential closed loop. However, the widespread application of digital network technology has led to the erosion of human subjectivity, the loss of emotional morality in virtual interactions, the difficulty of forming consensus in public opinion under a decentralized dissemination model, and challenges to the authority of mainstream values posed by decentralized dissemination. These dilemmas not only undermine individual subjectivity and independent thinking capabilities, but also exacerbate social value differentiation and public opinion polarization, posing potential threats to social stability and harmony. To address these issues, this paper proposes targeted solutions, including enhancing digital ethics education and awareness, establishing a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance system, and improving legal frameworks and ethical review mechanisms. These approaches aim to construct a more robust digital ethics system to effectively respond to the ethical challenges posed by digital technology development and promote digital