|
从侵权法角度探究企业数据保护
|
Abstract:
企业数据作为一种新生法律事务,在现有的立法体系下,立法者并未对其进行准确的定义和适用法律。从各地法院的裁判来看,法院的判决通常依据反不正当竞争法、知识产权法的有关法律规定对其进行裁判。但是在具体适用过程中,仍存在无法准确适用的情形,导致各地法院的判决无法真正服众。《民法典·侵权责任编》将保护范围从民事权利扩张到民事权益,这一扩张给侵权法保护企业数据提供了一定的可能,但是在适用过程中也应当符合我国侵权责任体系四要件的构成进行准确适用。
As a new legal matter, enterprise data has not been accurately defined and governed by law by legislators within the existing legislative system. From the judgments of courts in various regions, they usually make judgments based on relevant legal provisions of the Anti Unfair Competition Law and the Intellectual Property Law. However, in the specific application process, there are still situations where it cannot be accurately applied, resulting in the judgments of various courts being unable to truly appeal to the public. The Civil Code’s Tort Liability Section expands the scope of protection from civil rights to civil rights and interests, which provides a certain possibility for the protection of enterprise data in tort law. However, in the application process, it should also comply with the four elements of China’s tort liability system for accurate application.
[1] | 程啸. 论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(3): 102-122. |
[2] | 梅夏英. 数据的法律属性及其民法定位[J]. 中国社会科学, 2016(9): 164-183. |
[3] | 姬蕾蕾. 数据权的民法保护研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2019. |
[4] | 陈舟, 郑强, 吴智崧. 我国数据交易平台建设的现实困境与破解之道[J]. 改革, 2022(2): 76-87. |
[5] | 齐爱民. 捍卫信息社会中的财产——信息财产法原理[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009: 75-77. |
[6] | 王利明. 论民事权益位阶: 以《民法典》为中心[J]. 中国法学, 2022(1): 32-54. |
[7] | 薛军. 互联网不正当竞争的民法视角[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2016(4): 12-14. |
[8] | 王利明. 我国《侵权责任法》采纳了违法性要件吗? [J]. 中外法学, 2012, 24(1): 5-23。 |
[9] | 刘静, 宋洋溢. 环境民事诉讼中的防御性责任研究[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(6): 47-63, 109-110. |
[10] | 王洪亮. 论侵权法中的防御请求权[J]. 北方法学, 2010, 4(1): 46-54. |
[11] | 杨立新. 侵权责任法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 76. |