全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

民法典视角下居住权制度的理论构建与实践适用
Theoretical Construction and Practical Application of the Right to Residence System from the Perspective of the Civil Code

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2025.135153, PP. 1076-1084

Keywords: 民法典,居住权,理论构建,实践适用
Civil Code
, Right of Residence, Theoretical Construction, Practical Application

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

居住权作为一种新型用益物权,具有专属性、保障性和人身依附性的本质特征,其在民法典中的设立体现了对特定人群居住需求的法律回应。在立法设计上,居住权制度采取“合同 + 登记”的二元结构,形成了较为完整的规范体系,但在合同内容、登记规则、遗嘱设立等方面仍存在制度缺憾。居住权的设立与消灭涉及多重法律关系,尤其是特殊主体居住权设立及权利转让继承问题,需要通过类型化思维加以解决。在实践适用层面,居住权面临权利冲突协调、实施障碍破解、司法保护强化等多重挑战,需要构建体系化的解决方案。完善居住权制度应当从细化立法规则、统一司法标准、创新实施机制等维度入手,实现制度的可预期性与可操作性,充分发挥其社会保障功能与财产配置功能,为实现“住有所居”的民生目标提供有力的法律支撑。
As a new type of usufructuary right, the right of residence has essential characteristics of specificity, security, and personal attachment. Its establishment in the Civil Code reflects a legal response to the housing needs of specific groups of people. In terms of legislative design, the right to housing system adopts a binary structure of “contract + registration”, forming a relatively complete regulatory system. However, there are still institutional deficiencies in terms of contract content, registration rules, and will establishment. The establishment and termination of the right of residence involve multiple legal relationships, especially the establishment of the right of residence for special subjects and the transfer and inheritance of rights, which need to be solved through typological thinking. At the practical application level, the right to housing faces multiple challenges such as coordinating conflicts of rights, resolving implementation obstacles, and strengthening judicial protection, requiring the construction of a systematic solution. The improvement of the right to housing system should start from the dimensions of refining legislative rules, unifying judicial standards, and innovating implementation mechanisms, to achieve the predictability and operability of the system, fully play its social security and property allocation functions, and provide strong legal support for achieving the goal of “having a place to live” in people’s livelihoods.

References

[1]  万方. 居住权的双重立法目标及其问题[J]. 北京社会科学, 2024(12): 25-34.
[2]  姚宇. 居住权效力的体系化冲突与协调[J]. 政法论丛, 2024(6): 168-182.
[3]  焦富民. 以遗嘱方式设立居住权“参照适用”规范之适用[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(10): 100-112.
[4]  马强. 居住权合同研究[J]. 中国应用法学, 2024(5): 133-142.
[5]  马更新. 自然人破产程序中的居住权问题审视与规范建议[J]. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 22(5): 45-55.
[6]  崔炜. 居住权物上代位论质疑[J]. 财经法学, 2024(5): 165-178.
[7]  刘颖. 居住权排除强制执行的规则研究[J]. 北方法学, 2024, 18(4): 52-64.
[8]  张善斌, 翟宇翔. 论房屋强制执行中案外居住权人的保护[J]. 河南社会科学, 2024, 32(4): 78-86.
[9]  曾大鹏. 《民法典》居住权的三层构造之解释论[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2024, 27(2): 179-192.
[10]  李琳. 论以遗嘱设立居住权与狭义继承之区分及规范构造[J]. 清华法学, 2024, 18(2): 161-176.
[11]  骆小春, 王维茗. 民行交叉视域下居住权与抵押权的权利冲突与协调[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(4): 137-153.
[12]  侯银萍. 乡村振兴背景下居住权制度的实现进路[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2024(1): 87-95.
[13]  张罡. 我国《民法典》居住权制度的利益衡量与适用路径[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 44(4): 170-178, 223.
[14]  李永军. 论居住权在民法典中的体系定位[J]. 比较法研究, 2024(1): 63-75.
[15]  张永. 遗嘱设立居住权的类型构成[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2024, 39(1): 36-46.
[16]  封子路. 婚姻关系下居住权的裁判设立[J]. 求索, 2023(6): 145-153.
[17]  骆小春, 王维茗. 从对峙到共存: 执行程序中居住权的保护范围及措施[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 25(6): 42-55, 143-144.
[18]  单平基. 居住权与抵押权的并存及优先位序[J]. 东方法学, 2023(6): 154-166.
[19]  汪洋. 遗嘱方式设立居住权的规范构造[J]. 当代法学, 2023, 37(5): 42-53.
[20]  孟睿偲, 苌旺. 《民法典》可容纳非人役性居住权[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2023(3): 84-93, 151.
[21]  Lyu, P., Yu, M. and Hu, Y. (2020) Contradictions in and Improvements to Urban and Rural Residents’ Housing Rights in China’s Urbanization Process. Habitat International, 97, Article ID: 102101.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102101
[22]  Fields, H.W., Casamassimo, P., Owsiany, D.J. and Saperstein, M. (2020) The Case for Tying Specialty Status to Completion of Dental Residency: Dental Education’s Stake. Journal of Dental Education, 84, 852-856.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12139

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133