全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

人工智能时代算法歧视风险及治理研究
Algorithmic Discrimination and Its Governance in Era of Artificial Intelligence

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.145420, PP. 510-515

Keywords: 人工智能,算法歧视,歧视治理,评估体系
Artificial Intelligence
, Algorithmic Discrimination, Discriminatory Governance, Evaluation System

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

人工智能时代,在人工智能与大数据技术深度融合的时代背景下,算法借助各类数据实现倍增式的发展,带来便利的背后也引起不同程度的算法歧视。算法歧视作为传统社会歧视的数字化延伸,算法歧视的成因包括:算法黑箱带来的算法不可解释和决策不透明、数据偏差对文化历史偏见的继承放大、设计者和使用者的主观思维嵌入等。它的形成不仅加剧数字时代的信息失衡,抑制了创新发展的内生动力,更对社会的伦理秩序与法治根基构成深层冲击。规制算法歧视需多方协同发力,量化算法歧视风险程度,细化相关法律条款,构建更为细致明确的责任划分体系,设计者和使用者提高数字素养和算法认知、企业和社会需对算法的运用和监管勠力同心,构建责任共担的治理机制,多方协同护航数字社会的公平正义与可持续发展。
In the era of artificial intelligence, against the backdrop of the deep integration of artificial intelligence and big data technologies, algorithms have achieved exponential growth through leveraging diverse datasets. While bringing convenience, they have also engendered varying degrees of algorithmic discrimination. As a digital extension of traditional social discrimination, the causes of algorithmic discrimination include: The unexplainability of algorithmic operations and decision-making opacity stemming from algorithmic black boxes; the perpetuation and amplification of cultural-historical prejudices through data biases, and subjective thinking embedding of by designers and users. Its emergence not only exacerbates information imbalance in the digital age and stifles endogenous drivers for innovative development, but also poses profound challenges to the ethical order and legal foundation of society. Regulating algorithmic discrimination requires the concerted efforts of multiple parties, quantifying the risk level of algorithmic discrimination, refining relevant legal provisions, establishing a more detailed and clear responsibility allocation system, enhancing the digital literacy and algorithmic awareness of designers and users, and enterprises and society need to work together to apply and supervise algorithms, building a governance mechanism of shared responsibility to jointly safeguard the fairness, justice and sustainable development of the digital society.

References

[1]  陈昕明, 沈开举. 人工智能算法歧视的法律治理[J]. 河南牧业经济学院学报, 2023, 36(6): 37-43.
[2]  Varona, D. and Suarez, J.L. (2023) Social Context of the Issue of Discriminatory Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems. AI & Society, 39, 2799-2811.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01741-x

[3]  Chun, J.S., De Cremer, D., Oh, E. and Kim, Y. (2024) What Algorithmic Evaluation Fails to Deliver: Respectful Treatment and Individualized Consideration. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 25996.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76320-1

[4]  谢永江, 杨永兴. 人工智能时代下的算法歧视及其治理研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 18-25.
[5]  赵超. 平等保护视角下算法歧视的治理进路[J]. 上海市经济管理干部学院学报, 2024, 22(1): 53-63.
[6]  乔榛, 刘瑞峰. 大数据算法的价格歧视问题[J]. 社会科学研究, 2020(5): 90-96.
[7]  郭宏璟. 论算法的法律规制路径[J]. 中阿科技论坛(中英文), 2024(4): 143-147.
[8]  邱月明. 数字时代算法歧视的风险与治理研究[J]. 河南科技学院学报, 2024, 44(11): 43-50, 67.
[9]  杨永兴. 数字时代背景下的算法歧视及其规制[J]. 重庆开放大学学报, 2023, 35(5): 53-59.
[10]  关金金, 卢敬孔. 大数据算法歧视的决策危机与风险防控[J]. 黑河学院学报, 2023, 14(4): 62-64, 70.
[11]  陈强强, 张碧云. 公众参与算法歧视治理: 一项技术民主化研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(3): 507-513.
[12]  彭丽徽, 张琼, 李天一. 人工智能嵌入政府数据治理的算法歧视风险及其防控策略研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2024, 36(5): 23-31.
[13]  石颖. 算法歧视的发生逻辑与法律规制[J]. 理论探索, 2022(3): 122-128.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133