全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

我国航运碳排放权交易机制构建的基本路径原则
Fundamental Principles and Pathways for the Construction of China’s Shipping Carbon Emissions Trading Mechanism

DOI: 10.12677/isl.2025.93047, PP. 371-379

Keywords: 全球气候保护,碳排放权交易,绿色航运
Global Climate Protection
, Carbon Emissions Trading, Green Shipping

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对日益严重的全球气候问题,《联合国气候变化框架公约》《联合国气候变化框架公约京都议定书》及《巴黎公约》勾勒出了遵守“共同但有区别的责任”原则的全球气候保护公约体系。鉴于航运系温室气体主要排放口之一,授权于《联合国气候变化框架公约》,国际海事组织制定航运碳减排的相关规定,其重心逐渐从技术措施向市场措施倾斜,同时,欧盟宣布自2024年1月起将航运业纳入其碳排放交易体系的规制范围。我国作为航运大国,为实现碳达峰碳中和目标,响应国际海事组织号召,正致力于建设航运碳排放权交易机制,以期向国际航运碳排放权交易机制贡献中国经验,我们应遵守“共同但有区别的责任”的基本原则,借鉴欧盟现有做法和上海试点经验,建设践行全球治理观的航运碳排放权交易机制。
In response to the increasingly severe global climate crisis, international agreements such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol, and the Paris Agreement have established a global climate protection framework guided by the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities.” Given that shipping is one of the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), empowered by the UNFCCC, has formulated regulations to reduce carbon emissions in the shipping sector, with a gradual shift in focus from technical measures to market-based mechanisms. Notably, the European Union (EU) has announced the inclusion of shipping within its Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) starting in January 2024. As a leading maritime nation, China is committed to building a shipping carbon emissions trading mechanism to achieve its carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, and respond to the IMO’s initiatives. In this process, China should adhere to the fundamental principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities,” draw on existing practices of the European Union and Shanghai’s pilot experience, and develop a shipping carbon emissions trading mechanism that aligns with the principles of global governance to contribute Chinese expertise to the international shipping carbon trading framework.

References

[1]  易卫中, 黄素梅. “共区原则”在应对气候危机中的最新发展及对我国的启示——以《巴黎协定》为视角[J]. 江西社会科学, 2024, 44(10): 137-150.
[2]  田慧芳. 国际气候治理机制的演变趋势与中国责任[J]. 经济纵横, 2015(12): 99-105.
[3]  Rajamani, L. (2016) Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative Possibilities and Underlying Politics. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65, 493-514.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589316000130
[4]  李强. 构建中国的全球气候治理话语权的三重向度[J]. 当代世界社会主义问题, 2023(2): 37-47, 165.
[5]  陈继红. 欧盟航海碳税政策: 行业影响与应对策略[J]. 税务与经济, 2016(5): 94-100.
[6]  孙悦. 船舶碳排放国际法律治理: 分歧、模式及中国路径[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2023, 34(4): 16-26.
[7]  Scott, J. (2014) Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 62, 87-125.
https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2013.0009
[8]  李若瀚, 高娜. 论欧盟航空排放交易体系域外管辖的合法性及中国的应对[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 41(2): 134-140.
[9]  杨柳. 二氧化碳排放权分配: “基于共同但有区别的责任”原则[D]: [博士学位学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014.
[10]  Biermann, F. and Pattberg, P. (2008) Global Environmental Governance: Taking Stock, Moving Forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277-294.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.050707.085733
[11]  王科, 吕晨. 全球和中国碳市场回顾与展望(2025) [J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(2): 19-36.
[12]  IEA (2023) World Energy Balances (2023 Edition). Internation Energy Agency.
[13]  李晓易, 谭晓雨, 吴睿, 等. 交通运输领域碳达峰、碳中和路径研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2021, 23(6): 15-21.
[14]  彭传圣. 我国航运绿色发展现状与趋势[J]. 中国海事, 2022(6): 19-23.
[15]  交通运输部水运科学研究员. 中国内河航运中长期低碳发展路径研究[Z]. 交通运输部水运科学研究院, 2022.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133