全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

水平井暂堵压裂中暂堵球封堵孔眼规律实验研究
Experimental Study on the Law of Temporary Plugging Balls Plugging Perforation during Temporary Plugging Fracturing in Horizontal Wells

DOI: 10.12677/app.2025.155042, PP. 361-373

Keywords: 暂堵球,水平井,压裂,射孔孔眼
Temporary Plugging Balls
, Horizontal Wells, Fracturing, Perforation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

暂堵球对射孔孔眼的封堵效果直接关系到暂堵转向压裂技术的成败。为明确水平井暂堵压裂过程中暂堵球对水平井射孔孔眼的封堵规律,本文设计了一种水平井暂堵球射孔孔眼封堵实验装置,研究了不同泵注排量、暂堵球粒径、携带液粘度、射孔孔眼数以及球孔数比等因素对暂堵球分布及孔眼封堵规律的影响。结果表明:暂堵球的封堵效率随暂堵球粒径、射孔孔眼数的增大而降低,随泵注排量、球孔数比的增大而先升高后降低;实验评价最佳泵注排量为0.3 m3/min,最佳球孔数比为4:3;增大携带液粘度,暂堵球的封堵效率先减小后增大,转折点在10 mPa?s,本文的实验结果为水平井投球暂堵转向压裂方案提供了一定的参考和指导意义。
The plugging effect of the ball in the perforation directly affects the success of the temporary blocking steering fracturing technique. To clarify the plugging law of the temporary plugging ball on perforation holes during temporary plugging fracturing in the horizontal wells, this paper designed an experimental device for plugging the perforations with temporary plugging balls in horizontal wells, and analyzed the influence of different pumping rates, the diameters of temporary plugging ball, carrying fluid viscosities, the number of perforations, and the ratio of ball to perforation on the distribution of temporary plugging balls and the plugging laws of the perforations. The results show that the plugging efficiency of the temporary plugging ball decreases with the increase of the diameters of temporary plugging ball and the number of perforations, and increases first and then decreases with the increase of pumping rate and the ratio of ball to perforation; The optimal pump rate for experimental evaluation is 0.3 m3/min, and the optimal ratio of ball to perforation is 4:3; With the increase of the carrying fluid viscosities, the plugging efficiency of the temporary plugging ball first decreases and then increases, and the turning point is 10 mPa?s. The results can provide a certain reference and guiding significance for the optimization of the temporary plugging process of horizontal well to the fracturing ball. The results can provide a certain reference and guiding significance for temporary blocking plugging fracturing in horizontal wells.

References

[1]  李扬, 邓金根, 刘伟, 等. 水平井分段多簇限流压裂数值模拟[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(1): 69-73.
[2]  王博, 周福建, 邹雨时, 等. 水平井暂堵分段缝间干扰数值模拟方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4): 506-509.
[3]  李昊. 可降解球井筒中运移规律及炮眼内封堵工艺研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2017.
[4]  张锋. 水平井多簇水力压裂过程射孔孔眼冲蚀预测[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2023.
[5]  刘罗云, 李扬, 王迪. 水平井筒暂堵球运移规律实验及效果评价[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2023, 47(6): 55-66.
[6]  李龙, 陈显举, 彭安钰, 等. 贵州正安地区常压页岩气压裂关键技术[J]. 钻探工程, 2022(5): 49.
[7]  李松, 张华礼, 王萌, 等. 裂缝型碳酸盐岩储层暂堵转向酸压实验评价与工艺优化[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(3): 90-95.
[8]  李越, 牟建业, 揭琼, 等. 碳酸盐岩缝内暂堵转向压裂裂缝扩展规律实验[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2022(2): 44.
[9]  Brown, R.W., Neill, G.H. and Loper, R.G. (1963) Factors Influencing Optimum Ball Sealer Performance. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15, 450-454.
https://doi.org/10.2118/553-pa
[10]  Li, X., Chen, Z., Chaudhary, S. and Novotny, R.J. (2005). An Integrated Transport Model for Ball-Sealer Diversion in Vertical and Horizontal Wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, October 2005, SPE-96339-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2118/96339-ms
[11]  李婷婷, 许文俊, 王雷, 等. 水平井分段多簇压裂暂堵球运移封堵规律[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(1): 168-176.
[12]  李绍鹏, 李常兴, 周鹏, 等. 页岩气水平井暂堵坐封机制与可控暂堵压裂工艺[J]. 断块油气田, 2024, 31(3): 432-438.
[13]  韩慧芬. 可降解暂堵球动态封堵承压性能评价方法及装置研制[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(3): 55-60.
[14]  Li, S.Y. and Li, Z.M. (2012) Experimental Study on Ball Sealer Diversion for Lateral Well. Advanced Materials Research, 524, 1399-1407.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.524-527.1399
[15]  Yuan, L., Zhou, F., Li, M., Yang, X., Cheng, J. and Wang, B. (2022) Experimental Study on Diverter Transport through Perforations in Multicluster Fracturing of Horizontal Well. SPE Journal, 27, 971-985.
https://doi.org/10.2118/spe-208606-pa
[16]  邹龙庆, 何怀银, 杨亚东, 等. 页岩气水平井暂堵球运移特性数值模拟研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2023, 51(5): 156-166.
[17]  刘明明, 马收, 刘立之, 等. 页岩气水平井压裂施工中暂堵球封堵效果研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(6): 44-48+8.
[18]  孔祥伟, 时贤, 李赛, 等. 基于坐封受力模型的暂堵球封堵效果影响因素与参数优化[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(13): 5350-5357.
[19]  李喜斌, 李冬荔, 江世媛. 流体力学基础实验[M]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 2019: 154.
[20]  Nozaki, M., Zhu, D. and Hill, A.D.D. (2013) Experimental and Field Data Analyses of Ball-Sealer Diversion. SPE Production & Operations, 28, 286-295.
https://doi.org/10.2118/147632-pa
[21]  余志豪, 苗曼倩, 蒋全荣, 等. 流体力学[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2004: 78.
[22]  张峰, 荣莽, 许明标. 页岩气水平井暂堵球运移坐封机理[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(6): 2202-2208.
[23]  卢修峰, 刘凤琴. 投球分压的理论验证及实例分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 1994, 16(3): 57-62.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133