全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

生成式人工智能的著作权及其风险规避研究
A Study on the Copyright of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Risk Avoidance

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.145398, PP. 312-318

Keywords: 人工智能生成物,AIGC平台侵权,著作权
AI-Generated Objects
, AIGC Platform Infringement, Copyright

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

人工智能进入更加智能的生成式时代,社会治理局面复杂多变,技术飞速发展与立法滞后性之间存在着矛盾,新型纠纷不断涌现,现有法律体系难以覆盖新领域的社会治理困境,出现了无法可依的现象,科技的发展倒逼法律的完善。其中,人工智能生成内容的著作权问题和侵权问题是必须面对的社会治理难题,将人工智能生成的内容纳入著作权保护范围已经是时代趋势,且相关司法已经认定AIGC构成“作品”,由使用人享有著作权,但在侵权问题上存在着不同的情况,在输入端,在不损害他人知识产权的情况下,需要立法探索大模型训练数据输入的合法合理路径,在输出端,需要平台采取相关措施降低侵权风险,否则一旦侵权,平台需要承担相应的侵权责任。
The era of artificial intelligence has entered a more intelligent generative phase, with complex and ever-changing social governance situations. There exists a contradiction between the rapid development of technology and the lag in legislation, leading to the emergence of new types of disputes. The existing legal system struggles to cover the social governance dilemmas in new fields, resulting in phenomena where there is no legal basis. The development of technology compels the improvement of the law. Among these issues, the copyright and infringement problems related to AI-generated content are social governance challenges that must be addressed. Including AI-generated content within the scope of copyright protection has become a trend of the times, and relevant judicial decisions have recognised AIGC as constituting a “work”, with copyright held by the user. However, there are different circumstances regarding infringement issues. On the input side, it is necessary to explore legal and reasonable paths for the input of training data for large models without infringing on others’ intellectual property rights. On the output side, platforms need to take relevant measures to reduce infringement risks; otherwise, once infringement occurs, the platform must bear corresponding liability.

References

[1]  王俊秀. ChatGPT与人工智能时代: 突破、风险与治理[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(4): 19-28.
[2]  张新宝, 卞龙. 人工智能生成内容的著作权保护研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2024(2): 77-91.
[3]  庄诗岳, 辛谏. 生成式智能出版: 可版权性与著作权归属[J]. 编辑之友, 2024(3): 96-104.
[4]  王霁霞, 高旭. 论生成式人工智能创作物的著作权法保护[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 27(5): 103-110.
[5]  史凤林, 张志远. 论人工智能的公法规制: 美欧模式与中国路径[J]. 理论月刊, 2023(8): 127-139.
[6]  Frosio, G. (2024) Generative AI in Court. In: Kioutras, N. and Slvaduraie, N., Eds., Recreating Creativity, Reinventing Inventiveness, Routledge, 3-44.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003260127-2
[7]  姚志伟. 人工智能生成物著作权侵权的认定及其防范——以全球首例生成式AI服务侵权判决为中心[J]. 地方立法研究, 2024, 9(3): 1-17.
[8]  姚志伟, 李卓霖. 生成式人工智能内容风险的法律规制[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 43(5): 147-160.
[9]  李可心, 肖冬梅. 日本生成式人工智能训练数据合理使用规则及其启示[J/OL]. 图书馆论坛: 1-9.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1306.g2.20250224.1351.004.html, 2025-05-12.
[10]  张洪波, 付丽霞. 党的十九大以来我国著作权领域学术观点述评[J]. 编辑之友, 2022(4): 141-146.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133