|
恢复性司法视角下环境刑附民公益诉讼的刑民责任衔接
|
Abstract:
当前刑事附带民事公益诉讼的责任衔接中仍存在不和谐之处,主要关键在于刑事量刑与民事环境责任的履行存在衔接模式分裂、衔接标准缺失的问题。导致可能会发生类案不同判、刑事责任裁量失衡的问题。其根源在于刑民交叉点的选取只在于从民事责任履行考察犯罪人的悔罪态度这一点,实际上有狭隘之疑。通过恢复性司法视角,以及从法经济学理论对恢复性司法的审视,提出恢复性司法模式中实体性的刑民交叉点。在论证了合理性的理论基础上建构民事责任履行参与刑事量刑的合理性以及规范标准,对现有衔接模式存在的问题提供解决建议。
At present, there is still a disharmony in the connection of civil public interest litigation attached to criminal cases, and the main key lies in the division and lack of connection standards between the connection mode of criminal sentencing and the performance of civil environmental responsibility. Lead to the possibility of different cases, the imbalance of criminal responsibility discretion. Its root cause lies in the selection of the collaborative path of criminal liability and civil liability of the criminal people only from the repentance attitude of the criminal from the performance of civil liability, in fact, there is narrow suspicion. Through the perspective of restorative justice and the examination of restorative justice from the theory of legal economics, the collaborative path of criminal liability and civil liability of criminal people in the restorative justice model is proposed. On the theoretical basis of demonstrating the rationality, we construct the rationality and the norms and standards of participating in criminal sentencing, and provide suggestions to solve the problems existing in the existing responsibility cohesion mode.
[1] | 吕忠梅. 人与自然和谐共生视野下的环境法学理论创新[J]. 东方法学, 2023(2): 4-17. |
[2] | 王贤诚, 费雄雄, 黄佳. 环境资源刑事附带民事公益诉讼“认罪认罚认赔”模式构建——以法信网近三年来240份裁判文书为分析样本[C]. 审判体系和审判能力现代化与行政法律适用问题研究——全国法院第32届学术讨论会获奖论文集(下). 2021: 497-508. |
[3] | 梁琴, 刘曦朦, 屠超琦. 生态环境损害责任承担影响量刑的现实镜像与启示[J]. 人民检察, 2024(S1): 27-30. |
[4] | 胡静. 土壤修复责任的公法属性——目的和工具面向的论证[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2020, 49(5): 29-37. |
[5] | 梁展欣. 刑民交叉的规范与法理[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024. |
[6] | 刘晓虎. 恢复性司法研究: 中国恢复性司法之路[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014. |
[7] | 卢建平. 轻罪时代的犯罪治理方略[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(1): 51-66. |
[8] | 王树义, 赵小姣. 环境刑事案件中适用恢复性司法的探索与反思——基于184份刑事判决文书样本的分析[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 42(3): 102-110. |
[9] | Zehr, H. (2013) Restorative Justice? What’s That? In: van Wormer, S.K. and Wallke, L., Eds., Restorative Justice Today: Practical APPlications, SAGE, 7. |
[10] | 于志刚. 关于民事责任能否转换为刑事责任的研讨[J]. 云南大学学报(法学版), 2006, 19(6): 33-40. |
[11] | 贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014: 74. |
[12] | 唐纳德·A·威特曼. 法律经济学文献精选[M]. 苏力, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 29-50. |
[13] | 刘艳红. 民刑共治: 中国式现代犯罪治理新模式[J]. 中国法学, 2022(6): 27-46. |
[14] | 中华人民共和国最高法院公报. 指导性案例213号: 黄某辉、陈某等8人非法捕捞水产品刑事附带民事公益诉讼案[Z/OL]. http://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/60e31243d9beea9e19b559dbc94bb8.html?sw=%e5%88%91%e4%ba%8b%e9%99%84%e5%b8%a6%e6%b0%91%e4%ba%8b%e5%85%ac%e7%9b%8a%e8%af%89%e8%ae%bc, 2025-2-20. |
[15] | 周玉萍. 环境犯罪刑事案件中生态修复情节的量刑适用[EB/OL]. https://yqcqfy.shanxify.gov.cn/article/detail/2023/07/id/7424964.shtml, 2025-2-21. |
[16] | 高鸿钧. 德沃金法律理论评析[J]. 清华法学, 2015, 9(2): 96-138. |
[17] | 李晨光. 生态环境损害赔偿仲裁的证成与“入典”构想[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2025(1): 194-201. |
[18] | 戴谦, 时满鑫, 朱本腾, 等. 青岛法院发布创优跃升十佳工作机制[N]. 青岛日报, 2025-02-07(006). |