全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于熵权TOPSIS模型的油气资源型城市绿色发展评价——以榆林市为例
Green Development Evaluation of Oil and Gas Resource-Based Cities Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS Modeling—Taking Yulin as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2025.155131, PP. 84-94

Keywords: TOPSIS,DPSR,绿色发展,油气资源型城市
TOPSIS
, DPSR, Green Development, Oil and Gas Resource Cities

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为研究油气资源型城市过度依赖资源开发模式的突出问题,本文以我国典型油气城市榆林市为研究对象,利用熵权TOPSIS法构建DPSR四级指标测度绿色发展水平,系统评价2011~2022年绿色发展水平演变特征。结果显示,榆林市绿色发展指数呈现一定曲折变化,整体发展态势良好,但产业结构高碳化、生态环境治理压力大、环保意识与监管能力不足仍是绿色发展主要制约因素。本文提出聚焦产业链低碳化转型,构建绿色发展战略体系、创新生态治理的体制机制,形成协同治理体系、构建区域协同发展新格局,深度融入“一带一路”能源合作体系等治理路径,探索形成资源型城市绿色转型的榆林范式。研究成果为同类型城市破解“资源诅咒”、实现环境经济协同发展提供决策参考,对推进新型能源体系建设具有重要价值。
In order to study the outstanding problems of over-reliance on resource development mode in oil and gas resource cities, this paper takes Yulin City, a typical oil and gas city in China, as the research object, and utilizes the entropy weight TOPSIS method to construct a DPSR four-level index to measure the level of green development, and systematically evaluates the characteristics of the evolution of the level of green development in the period of 2011~2022. The results show that the green development index of Yulin City presents certain zigzag changes, but the overall development trend is good, but the high carbonization of industrial structure, high pressure on ecological and environmental governance, and insufficient environmental protection awareness and regulatory capacity are still the main constraints. This paper proposes focusing on the transformation of low-carbon industrial chain, building a green development strategy system, innovating the institutional mechanism of ecological governance, forming a coordinated governance system, building a new pattern of regional coordinated development, and deeply integrating into the “One Belt, One Road” energy cooperation system, etc., to explore the formation of the Yulin paradigm for the green transformation of the resource-based cities. The research results for the same type of cities to crack the “resource curse”, to realize the synergistic development of the environment and economy to provide decision-making references, to promote the construction of a new energy system has an important value.

References

[1]  张琳, 贺家睿. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法的绿色城市发展水平评价研究: 以济南市为例[J]. 工程管理学报, 2024, 38(1): 71-76.
[2]  Sæther, B., Isaksen, A. and Karlsen, A. (2011) Innovation by Co-Evolution in Natural Resource Industries: The Norwegian Experience. Geoforum, 42, 373-381.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.008

[3]  Petkova, V., Lockie, S., Rolfe, J. and Ivanova, G. (2009) Mining Developments and Social Impacts on Communities: Bowen Basin Case Studies. Rural Society, 19, 211-228.
https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.19.3.211

[4]  Chapman, R., Plummer, P. and Tonts, M. (2015) The Resource Boom and Socio-Economic Well-Being in Australian Resource Towns: A Temporal and Spatial Analysis. Urban Geography, 36, 629-653.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1018032

[5]  Bui, N.T., Kawamura, A., Kim, K.W., Prathumratana, L., Kim, T., Yoon, S., et al. (2017) Proposal of an Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment Framework for the Mining Sector of APEC Economies. Resources Policy, 52, 405-417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.05.005

[6]  朱斌, 吴赐联. 福建省绿色城市发展评判与影响因素分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2016, 35(4): 74-78.
[7]  陈小卉, 郑文含. 基于绿色发展的城市发展质量评价研究: 以江苏为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(3): 70-77.
[8]  曾贤刚, 段存儒. 煤炭资源枯竭型城市绿色转型绩效评价与区域差异研究[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2018, 28(7): 127-135.
[9]  岳书敬, 邹玉琳, 胡姚雨. 产业集聚对中国城市绿色发展效率的影响[J]. 城市问题, 2015(10): 49-54.
[10]  郭付友, 陈才, 刘志刚. 城市绿色发展效率的空间分异及影响因素——基于山东省17地市面板数据[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(5): 1014-1048.
[11]  马丁, 周新. 黄河沿岸城市绿色发展效率及影响因素分析[J]. 调研世界, 2020(12): 3-9.
[12]  吴艳霞, 魏志斌, 王爱琼. 基于DPSIR模型的黄河流域生态安全评价及影响因素研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(6): 322-331.
[13]  赵建鹏, 武江民, 贾腊春, 等. 基于驱动力-压力-状态-响应模型的黄河流域甘肃段生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2024, 40(5): 602-611.
[14]  李常亮, 雒天峰. 基于综合评分和熵权-TOPSIS模型的甘肃省水资源紧缺程度研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(7): 60-65.
[15]  刘照润青. 脱贫摘帽县农户经济发展质量评估——以陕西省合阳县为例[J]. 山西农经, 2021(4): 73-77.
[16]  马玉芳. 中国旅行社企业绩效评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 石家庄经济学院, 2008.
[17]  解蕾, 姚扬, 但智钢, 等. 基于DPSIR模型的省域绿色发展绩效评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(5): 1681-1686.
[18]  余永琦, 王长松, 彭柳林, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的农业绿色发展水平评价与障碍因素分析——以江西省为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(2): 187-196.
[19]  彭定洪, 李旭锋. 资源型城市绿色转型成效评价研究——以云南省为例[J]. 城市问题, 2023(7): 21-32, 52.
[20]  Jabareen, Y. (2013) Planning the Resilient City: Concepts and Strategies for Coping with Climate Change and Environmental Risk. Cities, 31, 220-229.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004

[21]  刘珊珊. 陕西省资源型城市绿色发展转型的测评与路径选择研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2018.
[22]  孙菲, 孙崇亮. 中国油气资源型城市工业绿色发展评价研究[M]. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2023.
[23]  陈英姿, 荣婧, 李晓巍. 东三省经济绿色增长水平评价及动力因素研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(8): 50-56.
[24]  盛瑞, 袁映奇. 资源型城市经济绿色转型发展——以陕西省榆林市为例[J]. 青海金融, 2022(10): 47-51.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133