|
师范生职业道德感现状及影响因素研究
|
Abstract:
本研究关注地方本科高校师范类学生这一群体,以职业道德感为主题,判断师范生职业道德感的基本水平,澄清影响因素,为职业道德培养提供可靠的实证性依据。研究围绕教师职业道德评价体系的构建与师范生职业道德感群体特质展开系统性探究,采用混合方法框架,运用分层抽样技术获取多维度数据。通过研究发现:师范生对良好师德行为的判定要优于对不良行为结果的判定;师范对职业道德故事中道德行为的判断要优于应然理性价值的判断。研究进一步探究了影响师范生职业道德感形成的可能因素,认为接受过系统的师德课程学习的师范生的职业道德感更高,而教育见习与实习的实践性教学经历并没有对其职业道德形成产生显著影响。最后,在调查结果基础上,提出师范教育课程体系的结构性优化,教师发展支持系统的制度性建构,职业道德的差异化培养路径,教育伦理生态系统的协同共建是系统提升师生职业道德感的可行路径。
This study focuses on the group of normal students in local undergraduate universities, with professional ethics as the theme. It aims to assess the basic level of professional ethics among normal students, clarify the influencing factors, and provide a reliable empirical basis for the cultivation of professional ethics. The research systematically explores the construction of a teacher professional ethics evaluation system and the group characteristics of normal students’ professional ethics, using a mixed-methods framework and employing stratified sampling techniques to obtain multidimensional data. The study finds that normal students are better at judging good moral behaviors than they are at judging the consequences of bad behaviors. They also perform better in judging moral behaviors in professional ethics stories than in judging the rational values that should be upheld. The research further investigates the potential factors influencing the formation of normal students’ professional ethics and concludes that those who have received systematic professional ethics courses have a higher level of professional ethics. However, practical teaching experiences such as educational observations and internships do not significantly affect the formation of their professional ethics. Finally, based on the research findings, the study proposes that the structural optimization of the normal education curriculum, the institutional construction of teacher development support systems, the differentiated cultivation paths for professional ethics, and the collaborative development of an educational ethics ecosystem are feasible approaches to systematically enhance the professional ethics of both teachers and students.
[1] | 教育部等七部门印发《关于加强和改进新时代师德师风建设的意见》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7002/201912/t20191213_411946.html, 2019-12-16. |
[2] | [美]穆雷尔, 等. 中小学教师职业道德培训手册[M]. 麦丽斯, 译. 北京: 北京中国青年出版社, 2016: 179. |
[3] | 王荣德. 教师职业伦理[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2013. |
[4] | 林崇德. 师德通览[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社, 2000. |
[5] | 檀传宝. 教师伦理学专题——教育伦理范畴研究[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版, 2010. |
[6] | 宋晓东, 刘次林. 中层概念测评及其在青少年道德测评中的应用[J]. 教育发展研究, 2018, 38(4): 24-30. |
[7] | 葛晨虹. 我们怎样进行道德评价[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2001(3): 27-33. |
[8] | 张倩, 杨韶刚. 从DIT到ICM: 道德判断测验的变迁[J]. 教育学报, 2017, 13(4): 98-104. |
[9] | 刘次林. 学校德育测评的三种取向[J]. 教育发展研究, 2016, 36(24): 6-12. |
[10] | 檀传宝, 张宁娟, 李敏, 班建武, 廖英, 徐萍, 王玉杰, 蔡辰梅, 林宇, 杨启华, 冯婉桢. 中学师德建设调查十大发现[J]. 中国德育, 2010(4): 5-10. |
[11] | Turner, M.E. (2008) The Development and Testing of an Army Leader Intermediate Ethical Concepts Measure. Master’s Thesis, The University of Alabama. |
[12] | Thoma, S., Derryberry, W.P. and Crowson, H.M. (2013) Describing and Testing an Intermediate Concept Measure of Adolescent Moral Thinking. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.766129 |
[13] | Roche, C., Thoma, S. and Wingfield, J. (2014) From Workshop to E-Learning: Using Technology-Enhanced “Intermediate Concept Measures” as a Framework for Pharmacy Ethics Education and Assessment. Pharmacy, 2, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy2020137 |