全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Enhancement of the Scientific Nature of Accounting: Past and Future Are Time Illusions, the Present Is the Power of Accounting

DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2025.153004, PP. 67-94

Keywords: Scientific Nature of Accounting, Accounting Equation, Double-Entry Bookkeeping, Triple-Entry Bookkeeping, Historical Cost Accounting, Time in Accounting, Past, Present, Future in Accounting, Accounting and Physics, Accounting Philosophy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

By reviewing the critical evolution of accounting, especially accounting equations and double-entry bookkeeping, the researcher finds that double-entry bookkeeping has been praised by many notable authors in history. What advantage do they derive from the system of double-entry bookkeeping? It is among the finest inventions of the human mind. The principle of bookkeeping by double-entry is described as absolutely perfect, and it bears the same spirit as the system of Galileo and Newton. This research provides some thoughts and equations regarding accounting equations and double-entry bookkeeping, which enhance the scientific nature of accounting. The emergence of double-entry bookkeeping stems from the need to account for business transactions instead of predicting them. The evolution of double-entry bookkeeping increased the ability of potential accountants and others interested in the accounting discipline to make their judgments on a broader and more informed basis. It enabled them to establish a relationship between past accounting practices and present practices, and what practices ought to be. Critics of double-entry bookkeeping, including many accounting academics, claim that this system is not an absolute system that defies any extensions but rather is logically extendible to triple-entry bookkeeping by including a set of accounts called “force” in its third axis. Since the world has changed significantly, does the double-entry bookkeeping system still bear relevance today? Researchers believe that it is still quite useful in today’s business environment. Pacioli’s explanation of the form of a double-entry bookkeeping system is approximate to the form of its final development today. The theory underlying Pacioli’s work is even more contemporary. Though his purpose was practical, double-entry bookkeeping was invented according to the laws of physics, indicating that the past and future are just thoughts happening in the present. Therefore, it is initially accepted that it is impossible to experience anything other than the present moment. According to the findings of this research, historical cost and constant purchasing power are sound principles in accounting. They suit any time and place, and every treatment in accounting is true and accurate as long as it is based on the double-entry and accounting equation found in mathematics; moreover, the concept of time in accounting is only forward. It is wrong to go back to the past to revalue assets within the conditions of the present time, as past and present are equal.

References

[1]  Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1986) Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice Hall.
[2]  Zimmerman, C. (2007) The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School. Developmental Review, 27, 172-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
[3]  Kuhn, T.S. (2000) The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. The University of Chicago Press.
[4]  Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd Edition, The University of Chicago Press.
[5]  Chua, W.F. (1986) Radical Development in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, 61, 601-632.
[6]  Hopper, T. and Powell, A. (1985) Making Sense of Research into the Organizational and Social Aspects of Management Accounting: A Review of Its Underlying Assumptions [1]. Journal of Management Studies, 22, 429-465.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00007.x
[7]  Bello, A. (2017) The Joint Information Content of General Purchasing Power and Current Cost Accounting.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228270005
[8]  García, N. (2017) Understanding Mattessich and Ijiri: A Study of Accounting Thought. Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-3504201721
[9]  Mattessich, R. (1964) Accounting and Analytical Methods. Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
[10]  Sterling, R.R. (1979) Toward a Science of Accounting, Business & Economics. Scholars Book Company.
[11]  Ijiri, Y. (1975) Theory of Accounting Measurement. American Accounting Association, 210.
[12]  Konchitchki, Y. (2011) Inflation and Nominal Financial Reporting: Implications for Performance and Stock Prices. The Accounting Review, 86, 1045-1085.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000044
[13]  Goldschmidt, Y. and Yaron, J. (1991) Inflation Adjustments of Financial Statements: Application of International Accounting Standard 29: Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. Policy, Research, and External Affairs Working Papers; WPS 670. Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank.
https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999682819002121?utm_source=chatgpt.com
[14]  Du and Min (2012) Energy Efficiency Direction, European Green Deal. First adopted in 2012, the directive was updated in 2018 and 2023, setting rules and obligations for achieving the EU’s ambitious energy efficiency targets.
[15]  Babalola, Y.A. (2013) The Effect of Firm Size on Firm profitability in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4, 90-94.
[16]  Sterling, R.R. (1988) Confessions of a Failed Empiricist. Advances in Accounting, 6, 3-35.
[17]  Paton and Littleton, A.C. (1940) An Introduction to Corporate Accounting Standards. American Accounting Association.
[18]  Adeem, K.R.A. (2017) Role of Doctoral Education in Shaping Minds and Thinking: Reflection on My Doctoral Education at Case Western Reserve University. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 9, 494-513.
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijca.2017.090578
[19]  Babalola and Abiola. F.R. (2013) Financial Ratio Analysis of Firms: A Tool for Making Decision International. Journal of Management Sciences, 1, 132-137.
[20]  Pacioli, L. (1494) Su[m]ma de arithmetica geometria proportioni [et] proportionalita. Paganinus de Paganinis.
https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.440357.39088007406663
[21]  Ellerman, D. (2014) On Double-Entry Bookkeeping: The Mathematical Treatment. SSRN Electronic Journal, 23, 483-501.
[22]  Mattessich, R. (1957) Towards a General and Axiomatic Foundation of Accountancy—With an Introduction to the Matrix Formulation of Accounting Systems. Accounting Research, 8, 328-355.
[23]  Mautz, R.K. (1963) Accounting as a Social Science. The Accounting Review, 38, 317-325.
[24]  Forrester, J.W. (1961) Industrial Dynamics. Productivity Press. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge.
[25]  Grove, E. (1989) Supply of Accounting Graduates and the Demand for Public Accounting Recruits, 2005, for Academic Year 2003-2004. AICPA Annual Reports, 135.
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_arprts/13
[26]  Ijiri, Y. (1982) Triple-Entry Bookkeeping and Income Momentum. In: Studies in Accounting Research, Vol. 18, American Accounting Association, 53.
[27]  Mattessich, R. (1989) Accounting and the Input—Output Principle in the Prehistoric and Ancient World. Abacus, 25, 74-84.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1989.tb00222.x
[28]  Wang, T.J. (2020) The Dao of Mathematical Creativity, Symmetry Theories, and Yin-Yang Philosophy with Their Classroom Applications. Beijing International Studies University (BISU), 17, 306-313.
[29]  Yang, C.-D. (2010) Scientific Realization and Verification of Yin-Yang Theory: Complex-Valued Mechanics. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 11, 135-156.
[30]  Beaver, W.H. (1998) Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution. Prentice Hall.
[31]  Hicks, J.R. (1969) Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. 2nd Edition, Clarendon Press.
[32]  Mautz, R.K. (1963) Challenges to the Accounting Profession. The Accounting Review, 40, 299-311.
[33]  Hsu, S.D.H. and Calmet, X. (2022) A Brief History of Hawking’s Information Paradox.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.08671
[34]  Elliott, B.J. (2011) Financial Accounting and Reporting. Pearson Education, 872 p.
http://www.pearsoned.co.uk
[35]  Ijiri, Y. (1996) Triple-Entry Bookkeeping and Income Momentum. American Accounting Association.
[36]  Rhawn, G.J. (2014) The Time Machine of Consciousness Past, Present and Future Exist Simultaneously. Cosmology, 18, 331-375.
[37]  Smolin, L. (2019) How to Understand the Universe When You’re Stuck Inside of It. 28 Jun 2019.
[38]  Mivkowski, M. (2021) The Four-Dimensional Space-Time. A Daily Blog on Science, Tech & Art in History. September 2009.
[39]  Eckhart, T. (2004) The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment. Namaste Publishing.
[40]  Grant, A. (2018) Stephen Hawking (1942-2018). Physics Today.
https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.6.4.20180314a
[41]  Goold, J., Huber, M., Riera, A., del Rio, L. and Skrzypczyk, P. (2016) The Role of Quantum Information in Thermodynamics—A Topical Review. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49, Article 143001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/14/143001
[42]  Slife, B.D. and Lanyon, J. (1991) Accounting for the Power of the Here-and-Now: A Theoretical Revolution. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 41, 145-167.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.1991.11490641
[43]  Sarmiento, J.L. (2006) Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics. Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400849079
[44]  Volmar, A. and Stine, K. (2021) Media Infrastructures and the Politics of Digital Time: Essays on Hardwired Temporalities. Amsterdam University Press.
[45]  Heidegger, M. (1927) Sein und Zeit [Being and Time]. Todtnauberg, Black Forest.
[46]  Heidegger, M. (2025) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. By the Metaphysics Research Lab, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University.
[47]  Siegel, E. (2018) We Still Don’t Understand Why Time Only Flows Forward. The Past Is Gone, the Future Is Not Yet Here, Only the Present Is Now. But Why Does It Always Flow the Way It Does for Us? Starts With A Bang, March 16, 2018.
[48]  Einstein, A. (1905) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 322, 891-921.
https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053221004
[49]  Rindler, W. (2006) Introduction to Special Relativity. 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press.
[50]  Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S. and Wheeler, J.A. (1973) Gravitation. W.H. Freeman and Company.
[51]  Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B. and Sands, M. (2011) The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Volume 1—The New Millennium Edition. Basic Books.
[52]  Taylor, E.F. and Wheeler, J.A. (2000) Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity. 2nd Edition, W.H. Freeman and Company.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133