Urban areas often encounter significant challenges in stormwater management due to the prevalence of impermeable surfaces, such as asphalt, concrete, and buildings, which hinder natural water cycle. Existing stormwater management solutions are frequently neither viable nor adaptable for communities. These approaches are often costly, time-intensive, and fail to account for climate change adaptability, as well as community consultation and participation. The primary objective of this study is to analyze urban land use and land cover (LULC) to develop a tool that helps communities and stakeholders identify nature-based solutions for stormwater management, customized to their specific and localized context. A thematic analysis was conducted on the Urban LULCs of two urban areas in Puerto Rico—Bayamón and Ponce—to develop a comprehensive taxonomy of urban LULC. This analysis provided a deeper understanding of the urban surfaces in Puerto Rico, identifying 15 distinct types of urban LULC through a visual characterization conducted at a 1:1000 scale using Landsat 8 images. Through a literature review, 22 specific nature-based solutions were identified, and categorized based on water/surface relationship (shallow infiltration, storage, runoff management, and deep infiltration). This tool is designed to transform urban spaces by prioritizing surfaces that effectively manage water, mitigate flooding risks, and improve water quality, thereby enhancing the sustainability of urban environments from an individual/community scale. It introduces an array of alternatives to traditional urban water management, expanding the possibilities for more sustainable and context-sensitive approaches. By linking surface taxonomy to water management, the study provides a valuable resource for strengthening urban resilience against climate variability and extreme weather events by gaining a deeper understanding of water behavior in our communities.
References
[1]
Zhang, X.Q. (2016) The Trends, Promises and Challenges of Urbanisation in the World. Habitat International, 54, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.018
[2]
Gebre, T. and Gebremedhin, B. (2019) The Mutual Benefits of Promoting Rural-Urban Interdependence through Linked Ecosystem Services. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00707
[3]
He, C., Liu, Z., Wu, J., Pan, X., Fang, Z., Li, J., et al. (2021) Future Global Urban Water Scarcity and Potential Solutions. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 4667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3
[4]
Su, D., CAO, Y., Dong, X., Wu, Q., Fang, X. and Cao, Y. (2024) Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Budget Based on Ecosystem Services Flow: A Case Study of Hangzhou Bay Area. Applied Geography, 162, Article ID: 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103150
[5]
Yang, D., Yang, Y. and Xia, J. (2021) Hydrological Cycle and Water Resources in a Changing World: A Review. Geography and Sustainability, 2, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.003
[6]
Campos, J.C., Rodrigues, S., Sil, Â., Hermoso, V., Freitas, T.R., Santos, J.A., et al. (2022) Climate Regulation Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Are Enhanced Differently by Climate-and Fire-Smart Landscape Management. Environmental Research Letters, 17, Article ID: 054014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac64b5
[7]
Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., Bellezoni, R.A., Shih, W. and Bayulken, B. (2022) Innovations in Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure: Tackling Local and Global Challenges in Cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, Article ID: 132355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132355
[8]
Chausson, A., Turner, B., Seddon, D., Chabaneix, N., Girardin, C.A.J., Kapos, V., et al. (2020) Mapping the Effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation. Global Change Biology, 26, 6134-6155. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15310
[9]
Zapletal, M., Kašpar, V., Samec, P. and Bílek, J. (2022) Green Infrastructure and Its Effect on Air Quality: Methodology of Planting Greenery in Urban Areas in Order to Capture Pollution. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359993424_Green_Infrastructure_and_its_Effect_on_Air_Quality_Methodology_of_planting_greenery_in_urban_areas_in_order_to_capture_pollution
[10]
Pérez Rubi, M. and Hack, J. (2021) Co-Design of Experimental Nature-Based Solutions for Decentralized Dry-Weather Runoff Treatment Retrofitted in a Densely Urbanized Area in Central America. Ambio, 50, 1498-1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01457-y
[11]
Jurgilevich, A., Käyhkö, J., Räsänen, A., Pörsti, S., Lagström, H., Käyhkö, J., et al. (2023) Factors Influencing Vulnerability to Climate Change-Related Health Impacts in Cities—A Conceptual Framework. Environment International, 173, Article ID: 107837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107837
[12]
Arapostathis, S.G. (2021) A Methodology for Automatic Acquisition of Flood-Event Management Information from Social Media: The Flood in Messinia, South Greece, 2016. Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10105-z
[13]
Plan de uso de terrenos (2015) Junta de Planificación.
[14]
Gould, W.A., Alarcon, C., Fevold, B., Jimenez, M.E., Martinuzzi, S., Potts, G., Quinones, M., Solórzano, M. and Ventosa, E. (2008) The Puerto Rico Gap Analysis Project Volume 1: Land Cover, Vertebrate Species Distributions, and Land Stewardship. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry.
[15]
Xu, H., Randall, M. and Fryd, O. (2023) Urban Stormwater Management at the Meso-Level: A Review of Trends, Challenges and Approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, Article ID: 117255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117255
[16]
Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Maginnis, S. and Janzen, C. (2016) Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges. IUCN.
[17]
Smart Growth America (2018) Transit-Oriented Development Technical Assistance: Second Summary Report. Soil Science Division Staff. Soil Survey Manual—USDA Handbook No. 18.
[18]
Minixhofer, P. and Stangl, R. (2021) Green Infrastructures and the Consideration of Their Soil-Related Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas—A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13, Article 3322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063322
[19]
Yang, D., Yang, Y. and Xia, J. (2021) Hydrological Cycle and Water Resources in a Changing World: A Review. Geography and Sustainability, 2, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.003
[20]
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center—ERDC (2021) USACE Announces a Launch Event for the International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management.
[21]
Gonzalez-Ollauri, A., Mickovski, S.B., Anderson, C.C., Debele, S., Emmanuel, R., Kumar, P., et al. (2023) A Nature-Based Solution Selection Framework: Criteria and Processes for Addressing Hydro-Meteorological Hazards at Open-Air Laboratories across Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, Article ID: 117183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117183