全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

资本维持原则下对赌回购义务履行障碍之破解
Cracking the Obstacles to the Fulfillment of the Bet Repurchase Obligation under the Capital Maintenance Principle

DOI: 10.12677/isl.2025.93030, PP. 232-240

Keywords: 资本维持,对赌回购,障碍机制,偿债能力测试
Capital Maintenance
, Buyback, Barrier Mechanisms, Solvency Test

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

资本维持原则是阻碍对赌回购义务履行的重要障碍。其作用途径主要通过“盈余分配规则”阻碍对赌回购义务履行的资金来源与“减资程序前置”架空对赌回购义务履行请求权的方式实现。与僵化的资本维持原则相比,偿债能力测试更注重目标公司实际偿还债务的能力,其回购自由度更高,但在实际操作中容易过分依赖董事个人的商业判断。因此,在平衡投资者、目标公司与债权人利益的基础上,最好采用折中办法破解对赌回购义务的履行障碍。一方面,确立股份回购的财源限制标准、扩大对赌回购的资金来源以缓解资本维持原则的僵化;另一方面合理融入偿债能力测试,区分上市公司与非上市公司的不同需求,分别引入不同的测试子标准。
The capital maintenance principle is an important obstacle to the fulfillment of the bet repurchase obligation. It is mainly realized through the “surplus distribution rule” which hinders the source of funds for the fulfillment of the betting repurchase obligation, and the “capital reduction procedure” which empties the right to request for the fulfillment of the betting repurchase obligation. Compared with the rigid capital maintenance principle, the solvency test pays more attention to the target company’s actual ability to repay its debts, and its repurchase freedom is higher, but it is easy to rely too much on the business judgment of the directors in the actual operation. Therefore, on the basis of balancing the interests of investors, target companies, and creditors, it is best to adopt a compromise approach to crack the obstacles to fulfillment the betting repurchase obligation. On the one hand, it is advisable to establish criteria for limiting financial resources for share buybacks and expanding the source of funds for betting on buybacks to alleviate the rigidity of the capital maintenance principle; on the other hand, it is advisable to reasonably incorporate a solvency test, distinguishing between the different needs of listed companies and non-listed companies, and introducing different sub-criteria for the test respectively.

References

[1]  刘燕. 对赌协议与公司法资本管制: 美国实践及其启示[J]. 环球法律评论, 2016, 38(3): 137-156.
[2]  贾璐. 对赌协议履行障碍之纾解——基于资本维持原则的反思与建议[J]. 投资者, 2024(1): 162-178.
[3]  张保华. 对赌协议下股份回购义务可履行性的判定[J]. 环球法律评论, 2021, 43(1): 85-100.
[4]  山茂峰. 论公司对赌义务履行的绝对性——以反思“九民纪要”第5条为线索[J]. 财经法学, 2022(3): 164-178.
[5]  包康赟. 利益衡量视角下对赌协议可履行性判断的规则设计[J]. 清华法学, 2024, 18(5): 150-163.
[6]  韩雪. 对赌股权回购义务履行障碍的破解[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(5): 76-85.
[7]  张玉滢, 闵晶晶. 股权回购型“对赌协议”的价值选择及裁判思路[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(23): 28-35.
[8]  贺剑. 对赌协议何以履行不能?——一个公司法与民法的交叉研究[J]. 法学家, 2021(1): 156-170+196.
[9]  于莹, 司耕旭. 重思公司分配行为的约束机制:以偿债能力测试的借鉴为中心[J]. 清华法学, 2023, 17(1): 172-186.
[10]  王毓莹. 论股份回购的资本规制[J]. 比较法研究, 2025(1): 162-175.
[11]  王子一. 公司治理语境下股份回购资本规制的反思与重塑[C]//中国政法大学民商经济法学院. 《上海法学研究》集刊(2021年第22卷总第70卷)——中国政法大学商法前沿文集. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2021: 42-54.
[12]  朱慈蕴, 皮正德. 公司资本制度的后端改革与偿债能力测试的借鉴[J]. 法学研究, 2021, 43(1): 54-70.
[13]  朱婧婧. 股权回购型对赌协议履行问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2023.
[14]  邢海宝, 安晨曦. 论公司法出资期限规则的更新——以股东与债权人利益的平衡为视角[J]. 河北法学, 2025, 43(4): 38-61.
[15]  罗开卷, 周天娇. 新公司法下“对赌协议”履行进路探析——以厘清合同法与公司法的关系为前提[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2024, 39(6): 20-29.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133