论《民法典》与知识产权法的衔接与协调——兼谈知识产权法体系化的路径选择
On the Connection and Coordination between the “Civil Code” and Intellectual Property Law—With a Discussion on the Pathway to Systematization of Intellectual Property Law

知识产权法体系化的路径一直是学界研究的焦点问题。《民法典》出台后，知识产权并未成为独立的一编，短时间内对《民法典》修改并不切合实际。《民法典》与知识产权法存有法律适用冲突之处，应运用法律解释的方法予以协调。基于知识产权法的快速发展，未来的发展走向在于数据法、信息法。因此，现阶段知识产权体系化的路径可以以《民法典》第123条为“点”，再制定《知识产权法总则》，以此为“面”，点面结合，补充完善知识产权单行立法体系，进而作为知识产权法体系化发展的尝试。
The pathway to systematization of intellectual property has long been a focal issue in academic research. Following the enactment of the “Civil Code”, intellectual property rights were not codified as an independent section, and amending the “Civil Code” in the short term remains impractical. There are conflicts of legal application between the “Civil Code” and individual intellectual property laws, which should be coordinated through methods of legal interpretation. Given the rapid development of intellectual property law, future trends will likely focus on data law and information law. Therefore, the current systematization of intellectual property law may adopt Article 123 of the “Civil Code” as an “anchor point”, followed by the formulation of a “General Provisions of Intellectual Property Law” as a “framework”. This point-surface integration approach would supplement and refine the legislative system of specialized intellectual property laws, serving as an experimental pathway toward the systematic development of intellectual property law.