全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

江南水系结构城市滨河文化带建设法治保障探究——浙江部分水乡城市为例
Research on the Legal Guarantee for the Construction of Urban Riverside Cultural Belt in the Water System Structure of Jiangnan Region—Taking Some Water Towns in Zhejiang Province as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2025.134112, PP. 791-796

Keywords: 江南水系结构城市,滨河文化带,法治保障,地方立法
Jiangnan Water System Structure City
, Riverfront Cultural Belt, Legal Protection, Local Legislation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

江南水系结构城市傍水而生,形成了丰富的水乡文化,建设滨河文化带不仅能够保护传统河道流域,还能传承弘扬独具特色的水乡文化、民俗,拉动城市旅游经济,丰富居民精神文明。当前不少城市已作出尝试,取得一定成效的同时也存在一些问题,如权责划分不明确、生态补偿机制不到位、行政处罚难度大、文化带设计表面化等问题,亟需完善的法治保障。中央性法律概括性强,地方立法应更注重因地制宜,结合地方经济发展、河道治理实际,通过变更立法方向、明确权责主体、规范处罚标准等方式完善滨河文化带建设的法治保障,使滨河文化带真正发挥其生态、文明和经济作用。
Jiangnan river structure city is born alongside the water, forming a rich water town culture, and the construction of a riverside cultural belt can not only protect the traditional river basin, but also inherit and carry forward the unique water town culture and folk customs, stimulate the city tourism economy, enrich the spiritual civilization of residents. At present, many cities have tried to achieve certain results, but there are also some problems that need to be improved legal protection, such as the unclear division of rights and responsibilities, the ecological compensation mechanism is not in place, administrative penalties are difficult, and the design of the cultural belt is superficial. The central law is strong in general, and local legislation should pay more attention to local conditions, combined with the actual local economic development and river management, improve the legal guarantee of the construction of riverside cultural belt by changing the legislative direction, clarifying the main body of rights and responsibilities, and regulating punishment standards, so that the riverside cultural belt can truly play its ecological, civilized and economic roles.

References

[1]  涂师平. 浙江宁波地域水神崇拜文化考探[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 32(1): 14-18.
[2]  严明. 吴文化的基本界定[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1991, 7(3): 100, 104-108.
[3]  张录强. 城市景观中人工河流的生态功能[J]. 生态经济, 2005, 21(5): 32-33.
[4]  韩璐, 潘长学, 刘宏宇. 基于以人为本的中国城市绿道建设研究: 功能、涵义与类型[J]. 南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), 2019(2): 103-106.
[5]  沈满洪, 陆菁. 论生态保护补偿机制[J]. 浙江学刊, 2004(4): 217-220.
[6]  张震. 生态文明入宪及其体系性宪法功能[J]. 当代法学, 2018, 32(6): 50-59.
[7]  潘扎荣, 阮晓红. 淮河流域河道内生态需水保障程度时空特征解析[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(3): 280-290.
[8]  吕忠梅. 寻找长江流域立法的新法理——以方法论为视角[J]. 政法论丛, 2018(6): 67-80.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133