|
“三权分置”背景下农地信托的法律困境与突破路径
|
Abstract:
当前,在土地制度的改革转向“三权分置”模式的背景下,农地信托的兴起为农业土地流转的优化、提升土地利用效率提供了新的契机。但目前这一转型在实践中遭遇了一系列挑战和问题。通过对“三权分置”与农地信托理论基础、现状与问题的分析,可以发现:农村股份合作社作委托人时利益分配不均,信托公司作受托人参与意愿不强,信托登记制度存在空白以及信托监管制度不够完善等问题。上述问题的主要成因有土地股份合作社的法律地位模糊、信托公司缺乏有效的保障和激励机制、信托财产不明以及信托监察人制度存在缺陷。针对这些问题与成因,应探索完善法律以明确土地股份合作社的法律地位,风险保障与激励并存来构建信托公司的保障激励机制,确定信托财产登记效力与登记机关,并建立多主体参与的协同监管体系,以突破现有困境,促进农地信托的健康发展。
At present, under the background of the reform of the land system turning to the “separation of the three rights” mode, that is, the hierarchical right system of collective land ownership, land contract management rights, and land management rights, the rise of agricultural land trust provides a new opportunity for the optimization of agricultural land circulation and the improvement of land use efficiency. But at present, the transformation also brought a series of challenges and problems, including the “separation” and the farmland trust theory understanding, and the present situation and its problems analysis found rural share cooperatives as the principal interest distribution, the trust company as the trustee participation will is not strong, the trust registration system is blank and trust supervision system is not perfect. Through empirical research, the causes of their legal difficulties are revealed, such as the vague legal status of land share cooperatives, the lack of effective guarantee and incentive mechanism of trust companies, the unclear trust property, and the defects of the trust supervisor system. To solve these problems, it should explore the perfect law to clarify the legal status of land stock cooperative, risk protection and incentives to build safeguard incentive mechanism, trust company determine the trust property registration effect and registration authority, and establish multi-subject participation in collaborative supervision system, to break through the existing difficulties, promote the healthy development of farmland trust.
[1] | 2024年6~7月“三农”政策资讯要览[J]. 中国农民合作社, 2024(7): 5-6. |
[2] | 刘兆军, 李松泽. “三权分置”权利关系下的农地流转方式研究[J]. 学习与探索, 2018(2): 134-140. |
[3] | 邸敏学, 郭栋. 益阳草尾镇土地信托流转模式的深层解读[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(2): 88-92. |
[4] | 姜雪莲. 农村土地承包经营权流转信托的法律问题——以中信安徽宿州农村土地承包经营权信托为中心[J]. 北方法学, 2014(4): 25-32. |
[5] | 杜明鸣, 刘司墨. 我国农地信托受托人主体范畴及义务标准研究——基于益阳、桃园、宿州实践模式比较[J]. 安徽行政学院学报, 2018(4): 99-105. |
[6] | 尚旭东, 叶云. 农村土地承包经营权流转信托: 探索实践与待解问题[J]. 农村经济, 2014(9): 68-72. |
[7] | 高圣平. 农地信托流转的法律构造[J]. 法商研究, 2014(2): 28-33. |
[8] | 李萌. “三权分置”背景下农村土地经营权的信托流转[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2024(1): 135-144. |
[9] | 陈会广. 土地股份合作社发展三题[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2009, 30(4): 11-15. |
[10] | 夏小雄. 信托业监管体系重构: 问题剖析、理论反思与制度完善[J]. 金融监管研究, 2020(9): 99-114. |
[11] | 杨正英, 袁福明. 浅谈农民专业合作社与股份经济合作社的异同点[J]. 农村财务会计, 2023(3): 57-58. |
[12] | 曹泮天. 农村土地信托中地方人民政府的角色调适与制度回应[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2023, 25(4): 26-40. |
[13] | 房绍坤, 任怡多. 新承包法视阈下土地经营权信托的理论证成[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(2): 33-44. |
[14] | 刘光祥. 土地承包经营权信托流转主要法律问题研究——以中信——农村土地承包经营权集合信托计划1301期为例[J]. 时代法学, 2014, 12(5): 75-89. |
[15] | 李蕊. 农地信托的法律障碍及其克服[J]. 现代法学, 2017, 39(4): 54-66. |
[16] | 李杰. “三权分置”视域下农地信托改革的实践例证与制度保障[J]. 安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 29(6): 10-15. |
[17] | 高圣平. 土地经营权登记规则研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2021(4): 1-16. |
[18] | 王斌. 论土地承包经营权信托中农户权益之保障[J]. 中国不动产法研究, 2015(2): 177-197. |