|
|
我国碳排放与期货市场间的风险溢出效应研究
|
Abstract:
本论文利用Diebold-Yilmaz指数溢出模型，构建我国各区域碳市场与能源类期货、金融类期货的溢出效应模型，由此探索其跨市场关联机制及其影响的风险传导路径。结果表明，溢出效应在碳市场与能源市场之间具有时效性，受到环境政策、经济形势和技术进步等因素的影响。不同地区的溢出效应体系具有异质性，存在跨区域市场碳价风险对冲或套利可能。管理者和政策制定者应根据地区特点灵活调整管理政策，保留地方市场并加强地区间合作与协调，以实现全局碳减排目标，促进碳市场的健康发展。
This paper adopts the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover index model to construct a spillover effect model between China’s regional carbon markets and energy-related futures, as well as financial futures, aiming to explore their cross-market linkage mechanisms and the risk transmission pathways. The results indicate that the spillover effects between carbon markets and energy markets are time-sensitive and influenced by factors such as environmental policies, economic conditions, and technological advancements. The spillover effect systems in different regions exhibit heterogeneity, presenting possibilities for cross-regional carbon price risk hedging or arbitrage. Managers and policymakers should flexibly adjust management policies based on regional characteristics, preserve local markets, and enhance inter-regional cooperation and coordination to achieve global carbon reduction goals and promote the healthy development of carbon markets.
| [1] | Batten, J.A., Maddox, G.E. and Young, M.R. (2021) Does Weather, or Energy Prices, Affect Carbon Prices? Energy Economics, 96, Article ID: 105016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105016 |
| [2] | Cong, R. and Lo, A.Y. (2017) Emission Trading and Carbon Market Performance in Shenzhen, China. Applied Energy, 193, 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.037 |
| [3] | Ji, Q., Zhang, D. and Geng, J. (2018) Information Linkage, Dynamic Spillovers in Prices and Volatility between the Carbon and Energy Markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 972-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.126 |
| [4] | Hintermann, B. (2010) Allowance Price Drivers in the First Phase of the EU ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.07.002 |
| [5] | 华欣, 安园园. 欧盟碳期货与现货价格引导关系及启示[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(7): 25-29, 109. |
| [6] | 洪涓, 陈静. 国际碳排放权交易价格关系实证研究[J]. 中国物价, 2010(1): 7-11. |
| [7] | 黄文彬, 高韵芳. 碳排放权交易市场的信息流动关系——基于EUA市场和CER市场的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 2013, 32(11): 57-64, 111. |
| [8] | 邹绍辉, 张甜. 国际碳期货价格与国内碳价动态关系[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(5): 70-79. |
| [9] | Chevallier, J. (2011) A Model of Carbon Price Interactions with Macroeconomic and Energy Dynamics. Energy Economics, 33, 1295-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.012 |
| [10] | 邹绍辉, 张甜. 能源期货市场、能源股票市场与碳市场非线性关系动态分析[J]. 系统工程, 2020, 38(5): 1-13. |
| [11] | 王艺蓉. 碳交易背景下我国能源期货与能源股票市场的动态关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2023. |
| [12] | 车广君, 牟芸仪. 能源市场与广东碳排放市场的长短期动态关系研究——基于能源期货市场和现货市场[J]. 浙江金融, 2022(11): 58-67. |
| [13] | Keppler, J.H. and Mansanet-Bataller, M. (2010) Causalities between CO2, Electricity, and Other Energy Variables during Phase I and Phase II of the EU ETS. Energy Policy, 38, 3329-3341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.004 |
| [14] | Wang, Y. and Guo, Z. (2018) The Dynamic Spillover between Carbon and Energy Markets: New Evidence. Energy, 149, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.145 |
| [15] | Tan, X., Sirichand, K., Vivian, A. and Wang, X. (2020) How Connected Is the Carbon Market to Energy and Financial Markets? A Systematic Analysis of Spillovers and Dynamics. Energy Economics, 90, Article ID: 104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104870 |
| [16] | Ahonen, E., Corbet, S., Goodell, J.W., Günay, S. and Larkin, C. (2022) Are Carbon Futures Prices Stable? New Evidence during Negative Oil. Finance Research Letters, 47, Article ID: 102723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102723 |
| [17] | 张欢. 碳市场与化石能源市场问的金融风险溢出——以欧洲市场为例[J]. 华北金融, 2018(9): 16-24. |
| [18] | 王喜平, 王恬恬, 王婉晨. 基于溢出指数方法的我国碳市场与能源市场间风险溢出效应研究[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2023, 39(3): 25-33. |
| [19] | 苏蕾, 井博飞, 鞠婷婷. 中国碳排放权交易市场溢出效应分析——基于能源市场、电力市场和金融市场视角分析[J]. 商业经济, 2023(6):167-172. |
| [20] | Diebold, F.X. and Yilmaz, K. (2008) Measuring Financial Asset Return and Volatility Spillovers, with Application to Global Equity Markets. The Economic Journal, 119, 158-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x |
