Traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) models often fail to capture the full value of a business. This is often noticeable when firms sell at unexpected premiums. The discounted cash flow model introduced by Gélinas [1] addresses this gap by incorporating the potential synergies created when a company’s assets are acquired by another firm (DCFSynergies or 2.0 as the author labeled). This paper extends DCFSynergies by examining the further added value and risk implications of structuring a business for segmented sales (DCFSegmented), where different buyers acquire different parts of a firm, unlocking higher synergies than a single buyer could, which could explain even greater acquisition premiums. We also introduce standard deviation analysis to quantify valuation uncertainty and risk in both whole-firm and segmented sales. A numerical example illustrates how breaking a company into parts can result in higher valuation and lower risk-adjusted uncertainty than a whole-firm sale. We also present a recent case study that is consistent with our findings.
References
[1]
Gélinas, P. (2013) Discounted Cash Flow Model 2.0. Modern Economy, 4, 818-820. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2013.412087
[2]
Eaton, G.W., Liu, T. and Officer, M.S. (2019) Rethinking Measures of Mergers & Acquisitions Deal Premiums. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56, 1097-1126. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109019001091
[3]
Fernández, P. (2007) Valuing Companies by Cash Flow Discounting: Ten Methods and Nine Theories. Managerial Finance, 33, 853-876. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710823827
[4]
Schwert, G.W. (1996) Markup Pricing in Mergers and Acquisitions. JournalofFinancialEconomics, 41, 153-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(95)00865-c
[5]
Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. 3rd Edition, Wiley.
[6]
Haunschild, P.R. (1994) How Much Is That Company Worth? Interorganizational Relationships, Uncertainty, and Acquisition Premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 391.
[7]
Varaiya, N.P. (1987) Determinants of Premiums in Acquisition Transactions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 8, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090080302
[8]
Laamanen, T. (2007) On the Role of Acquisition Premium in Acquisition Research. StrategicManagementJournal, 28, 1359-1369. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.639
[9]
Tong, T.W. and Wu, F. (2012). Signaling Effects of Interorganizational Relationships on Acquisition Premiums. Journal of Management, 38, 1231-1254. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310381384
[10]
Bennett, R.J. and Dam, R. (2017) Anticipated Merger Gains and Stock Prices: Evidence from the U.S. Market. Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 251-268. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.006
[11]
Betton, S., Eckbo, B.E. and Thorburn, K.S. (2014) Merger Negotiations with Stock Market Feedback. Journal of Finance, 69, 1707-1747. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12169
[12]
Kaplan, S.N. and Ruback, R.S. (1995) The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 50, 1059-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04049.x
[13]
Damodaran, A. (2005) The Value of Synergy. Stern School of Business, New York University. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/synergy.pdf
[14]
House, C.L. and Masatlioglu, Y. (2010) Managing Markets for Toxic Assets (NBER Working Paper No. 16145). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w16145
[15]
Duchin, R., Gao, H. and Xu, J. (2022) Evidence from the Asset Market for Industrial Pollution. University of Washington, Foster School of Business. https://foster.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/3a-Duchin-Gao-Xu-Sustainability-or-GreenWashing.pdf
[16]
Kaplan, S.N. and Weisbach, M.S. (1992) The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures. The Journal of Finance, 47, 107-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03980.x
[17]
Burch, T.R. and Nanda, V. (2003) Divisional Diversity and the Conglomerate Discount: Evidence from Spinoffs. Journal of Financial Economics, 70, 69-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00137-0