In Uganda and several other countries, regulatory frameworks mandate that new acaricides undergo field trials prior to registration and licensing. We reviewed the various methods recommended for determining the field efficacy of new acaricides by reputable organizations and methods proposed by scholars. The methods were found to have some shortcomings affecting the quality of the field trial results. These included failure to consider the use of a comparable control product in the control group and failure to meet some principles of epidemiology, good clinical practice and animal welfare. To address these shortcomings and the lack of published literature concerning acaricide field trials, we propose an epidemiologically plausible and comprehensive novel method for determining the efficacy of acaricides under field conditions using the relative risk of tick infestation (RRTI) with the following formula: RRTI =
. We also determined the desired outcome for acaricide application, the variable for measurement of the outcome, designed a data capture form for trial data collection, developed formulae for determining efficacy, and provided guidance for interpretation of results as well as decision-making. The method is compliant with the principles of epidemiology, good clinical research practice, and animal welfare and addresses key realities in field settings, thus generating accurate, reliable and credible results. Researchers and regulatory bodies may consider embracing this method to promote the fair and plausible evaluation of new acaricides under field conditions.
References
[1]
Miyama, T., Byaruhanga, J., Okamura, I., Uchida, L., Muramatsu, Y., Mwebembezi, W., et al. (2020) Effect of Chemical Tick Control Practices on Tick Infestation and Theileriaparva Infection in an Intensive Dairy Production Region of Uganda. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 11, Article 101438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101438
[2]
Githaka, N.W., Kanduma, E.G., Wieland, B., Darghouth, M.A. and Bishop, R.P. (2022) Acaricide Resistance in Livestock Ticks Infesting Cattle in Africa: Current Status and Potential Mitigation Strategies. Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-Borne Diseases, 2, Article 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100090
[3]
Tukahirwa, E.M., Perry, B.D., Rowlands, G.J. and Nagda, S.N. (2003) The Impact of Tick Control on the Productivity of Indigenous Cattle under Ranch Conditions in Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 3, 237-247.
[4]
Vudriko, P., Okwee-Acai, J., Byaruhanga, J., Tayebwa, D.S., Okech, S.G., Tweyongyere, R., et al. (2018) Chemical Tick Control Practices in Southwestern and Northwestern Uganda. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 9, 945-955.
[5]
National Drug Authority (2017) Guidelines on Conduct of Ectoparasiticide Trials.
[6]
Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (2015) Guidelines for Conducting Trials for Cattle Acaricides in Zimbabwe.
[7]
European Medicines Agency (2022) Guideline for the Testing and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Antiparasitic Substances for the Treatment and Prevention of Tick and Flea Infestation in Dogs and Cats.
[8]
Petros, A., Befekadu, U.W., Mulisa, M. and Teka, F. (2015) In Vitro and in Vivo Acaricidal Efficacy Study of Amitraz and Diazinon against Some Tick Species Infesting Camelus Dromedarius around Jigjiga, Eastern Ethiopia. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 9, 850-855. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpp2015.4425
[9]
FAO (2004) Guidelines Resistance Management and Integrated Parasite Control in Ruminants.
[10]
VICH (1996) International Cooperation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products.
[11]
Dohoo, I., Martin, W. and Stryhn, H. (2009) Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. 2nd Edition, VER Inc.
[12]
Thrusfield, M. (2007) Veterinary Epidemiology. Wiley, 624.
[13]
Holdsworth, P., Rehbein, S., Jonsson, N.N., Peter, R., Vercruysse, J. and Fourie, J. (2022) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) Second Edition: Guideline for Evaluating the Efficacy of Parasiticides against Ectoparasites of Ruminants. Veterinary Parasitology, 302, Article 109613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109613
[14]
Holdsworth, P.A., Kemp, D., Green, P., Peter, R.J., De Bruin, C., Jonsson, N.N., et al. (2006) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) Guidelines for Evaluating the Efficacy of Acaricides against Ticks (Ixodidae) on Ruminants. Veterinary Parasitology, 136, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.11.011
[15]
TMDA (2020) Guidelines for Application to Conduct Clinical Trials in Tanzania.
[16]
Pharmacy and Poisons Board (2022) Guidelines for the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Kenya.
[17]
East African Community (2023) Draft East African Community Guidelines for Conducting Veterinary Pesticides Field Trials (Safety and Efficacy) and Relevant Template(s).
[18]
East African Community (2023) Draft Guidelines for the Registration of Veterinary Pesticides.
[19]
Byaruhanga, J., Odua, F., Ssebunya, Y., Aketch, O., Tayebwa, D.S., Rwego, I.B., et al. (2020) Comparison of Tick Control and Antibiotic Use Practices at Farm Level in Regions of High and Low Acaricide Resistance in Uganda. Veterinary Medicine International, 2020, Article 4606059. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4606059