|
浅析日本《少年法》修正对我国的借鉴意义
|
Abstract:
我国《刑法修正案十一》将刑事责任年龄下调至十二周岁,然而,其自2021年3月1日生效后至今,未成年人恶性犯罪案件仍旧处于高发态势,由此可见,仅仅依靠下调刑事责任年龄和追究刑事责任尚无法解决未成年人犯罪治理问题,还需要多方面发力,既要有相应的处置措施,也需要有相应的保护措施。文章从未成年人犯罪的“处置措施”和“保护措施”入手,学习借鉴日本《少年法》,从多个方面入手使“保护”和“处罚”这一矛盾达到相对平衡,更好地解决我国未成年人犯罪治理问题,完善我国的少年司法制度。
China’s “Criminal Law Amendment (Ⅺ)” lowered the age of criminal responsibility to twelve years old. However, since the “Criminal Law Amendment (Ⅺ)” took effect on March 1, 2021, the vicious crime cases of minors are still on a high trend. It can be seen that it is impossible to rely on lowering the age of criminal responsibility and investigating criminal responsibility alone. A multi-faceted approach is necessary, requiring both appropriate measures for handling as well as protective measures. This article starts from the “disposal measures” and “protection measures” of juvenile delinquency, learns from the Japanese “Juvenile Law”, and achieves a relative balance between the contradiction of “protection” and “punishment” from many aspects, better solves the problem of juvenile crime management in China, and improves China’s juvenile justice system.
[1] | 陈岚, 何璇. 日本少年法的修正及其对我国的启示[J]. 预防青少年犯罪研究, 2021(4): 87-96. |
[2] | 安琪. 保护、惩治与预防——我国少年司法制度变迁七十年(1949~2019) [J]. 中国青年研究, 2020(2): 35-41, 49. |
[3] | 蔡奇轩. 我国未成年人刑事责任年龄最低线之设置[J]. 法学杂志, 2018, 39(11): 56-63. |
[4] | 李玫瑾. 从刑事责任年龄之争反思刑事责任能力判断根据——由大连少年恶性案件引发的思考[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2020, 39(1): 10-21. |
[5] | 王贞会. 罪错未成年人司法处遇制度完善[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2020, 28(4): 134-148. |
[6] | 王曲. 未成年人刑事政策研究[J]. 河南社会科学, 2017, 25(4): 74-78. |
[7] | 刘芷函. 日本《少年法》新修正述评——以青年制度的增设为中心[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2023(4): 147-160. |
[8] | 李立丰. 日本少年司法制度“循环发展模式”的中国反思[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2016(5): 30-41. |
[9] | 狄小华, 王心宁. 愈合、康复与成长: 恢复性司法应对校园欺凌[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2019(6): 38-44. |