全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

从他者伦理学看《达洛维夫人》:主体间性转向
A Study of Mrs. Dalloway from the Ethics of the Other: The Intersubjective Turn

DOI: 10.12677/wls.2025.132029, PP. 195-202

Keywords: 《达洛维夫人》,主体间性,他者伦理学,列维纳斯,伦理批评
Mrs. Dalloway
, Intersubjectivity, The Ethics of the Other, Emmanuel Levinas, Ethical Criticism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的代表作《达洛维夫人》通过对各人物间复杂动态关系的描写,体现了对哲学中主体性和主体间性的思考。结合列维纳斯提出的他者伦理学思想,首先通过分析小说中达洛维夫人与基尔曼小姐、达洛维夫人与彼德的关系,展现与早期主体性哲学阶段类似的主体性之争;再通过解读小说中塞普提莫斯夫妇二人之间和达洛维夫人、基尔曼小姐与伊丽莎白三者之间的关系,揭示小说中体现的主体性到主体间性的他者伦理学转向;最后揭露弗吉尼亚真正所期待的主体间关系:即主体间应该保持一种永恒的“间距”。而正是主体对降之于自身的对他者责任的承担,主体才得以成为真正的主体。
Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece Mrs. Dalloway embodies the reflection on subjectivity and intersubjectivity in philosophy through the portrayal of the complex and dynamic relationship between various characters. Combined with the idea of “the Ethics of the Other” put forward by Levinas, firstly, through analysing the relationship between Mrs. Dalloway and Miss Kilman, and Mrs. Dalloway and Peter in the novel, it demonstrates the dispute of subjectivity similar to the early stage of the philosophy of subjectivity; then, through interpreting the relationship between Mr. and Mrs. Septimus and the relationship between Mrs. Dalloway, Miss Kilman, and Elizabeth in the novel, it reveals the turn to the ethics of the Other from subjectivity to intersubjectivity. And finally, it exposes the intersubjectivity that Virginia really expects: that is, the subjects should maintain an eternal “spacing”. It is the subject’s assumption of the responsibility for the Other, which is entrusted to the subject, that makes the subject a true “subject”.

References

[1]  孙庆斌. 从自我到他者的主体间性转换——现代西方哲学的主体性理论走向[J]. 理论探索, 2009(3): 35-38.
[2]  宇珊. 权力之下的主体地位——对《达洛维夫人》中克拉丽莎的福柯式解读[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 烟台: 鲁东大学, 2012.
[3]  魏娜. 伦敦的女性漫游者: 《达洛维夫人》中克拉丽莎的主体性重构[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 四川外国语大学, 2024.
[4]  汪浩敏. 如“影”随形——《达洛维夫人》中的主体性危机[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2023.
[5]  陈后亮. 伦理学转向[J]. 外国文学, 2014(4): 121-122.
[6]  林懿. 论德拉布尔《红王妃》文本观中的他者伦理[J]. 当代外国文学, 2016, 37(1): 60-67.
[7]  伍尔夫. 达洛维夫人[M]. 姜向明, 译. 西安: 陕西师范大学出版社, 2014: 33-533.
[8]  王嘉军. 存在、异在与他者: 列维纳斯与法国当代文论[M]. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2019: 49-61.
[9]  黑格尔哲学[M]. 鲍训吾, 译. 武汉: 崇文书局, 2023: 376.
[10]  Levinas, E. (1969) Totality and Infinity. Duquesne University Press, 314.
[11]  顾红亮. 责任与他者——列维纳斯的责任观[J]. 社会科学研究, 2006(1): 37-40.
[12]  Green, G. (1971) The Power and the Glory. Penguin, 131.
[13]  列维纳斯. 伦理与无限: 与菲利普·尼莫的对话[M]. 王士盛, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2020: 59.
[14]  Leaska, M.A. (1984) The Virginia Woolf Reader. Harcourt Brace Jobanovich, 14.
[15]  聂珍钊. 文学伦理学批评: 文学批评方法新探索[J]. 外国文学研究, 2004, 26(5): 16-24.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133